Boundary of mandibular molar distalization in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12778
Keyuan Liu, Guang Chu, Chengfei Zhang, Yanqi Yang
{"title":"Boundary of mandibular molar distalization in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Keyuan Liu,&nbsp;Guang Chu,&nbsp;Chengfei Zhang,&nbsp;Yanqi Yang","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To explore the mandibular retromolar space length (MRSL), initial root-inner cortex contact percentage (IRCCP), and the various factors that influence mandibular molar distalization. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and grey literature (Google Scholar and OpenGrey) for eligible cross-sectional observational studies measuring the MRSL and IRCCP in healthy adult patients. The risk of bias and evidence quality were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist and GRADE framework. Thirteen studies involving 1169 patients were included for qualitative synthesis. Seven of these studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the mean MRSL at the subfurcation-6 mm plane in Asian normodivergent cases was 3.78 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.81–4.35; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 79.7%) for skeletal Class-I malocclusions, 3.02 mm (95% CI: 2.10–3.94; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 62.5%) for Class-II, and 4.43 mm (95% CI: 3.14–5.73; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 75.1%) for Class-III. The mean MRSL at the sub-cementoenamel junction (CEJ)-10 mm plane for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 3.28 mm (95% CI: 2.44–4.12; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68.9%). The mean IRCCP for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 27.2% (95% CI: 0.22–0.32; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). In Asian normodivergent cases, MRSL ranges from 3.28 to 4.43 mm with a 27.2% IRCCP for Class-I. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging is recommended for measuring the MRSL in the apex region particularly before molar distalization. Factors influencing MRSL and IRCCP include different races, skeletal patterns, facial types, and third-molar status.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the mandibular retromolar space length (MRSL), initial root-inner cortex contact percentage (IRCCP), and the various factors that influence mandibular molar distalization. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and grey literature (Google Scholar and OpenGrey) for eligible cross-sectional observational studies measuring the MRSL and IRCCP in healthy adult patients. The risk of bias and evidence quality were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist and GRADE framework. Thirteen studies involving 1169 patients were included for qualitative synthesis. Seven of these studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the mean MRSL at the subfurcation-6 mm plane in Asian normodivergent cases was 3.78 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.81–4.35; I2 = 79.7%) for skeletal Class-I malocclusions, 3.02 mm (95% CI: 2.10–3.94; I2 = 62.5%) for Class-II, and 4.43 mm (95% CI: 3.14–5.73; I2 = 75.1%) for Class-III. The mean MRSL at the sub-cementoenamel junction (CEJ)-10 mm plane for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 3.28 mm (95% CI: 2.44–4.12; I2 = 68.9%). The mean IRCCP for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 27.2% (95% CI: 0.22–0.32; I2 = 0%). In Asian normodivergent cases, MRSL ranges from 3.28 to 4.43 mm with a 27.2% IRCCP for Class-I. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging is recommended for measuring the MRSL in the apex region particularly before molar distalization. Factors influencing MRSL and IRCCP include different races, skeletal patterns, facial types, and third-molar status.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸治疗中下颌臼齿远化的边界:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
探讨下颌反磨间隙长度(MRSL)、初始牙根-内皮层接触百分比(IRCCP)以及影响下颌磨牙远化的各种因素。我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和灰色文献(Google Scholar 和 OpenGrey)中检索了符合条件的测量健康成年患者 MRSL 和 IRCCP 的横断面观察性研究。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的核对表和 GRADE 框架对偏倚风险和证据质量进行了评估。定性综合纳入了涉及 1169 名患者的 13 项研究。其中七项研究符合定量分析的条件。元分析表明,在亚洲正常分化病例中,Ⅰ类骨骼畸形在6毫米平面下的平均MRSL为3.78毫米(95%置信区间[CI]:2.81-4.35;I2 = 79.7%),Ⅱ类为3.02毫米(95% CI:2.10-3.94;I2 = 62.5%),Ⅲ类为4.43毫米(95% CI:3.14-5.73;I2 = 75.1%)。亚洲人、I类、正常分化病例在牙釉质下交界处(CEJ)-10 mm平面的平均MRSL为3.28 mm (95% CI: 2.44-4.12; I2 = 68.9%)。亚裔 I 类正常偏异病例的平均 IRCCP 为 27.2% (95% CI: 0.22-0.32; I2 = 0%)。在亚洲正常分化病例中,MRSL 的范围为 3.28 至 4.43 毫米,I 类病例的 IRCCP 为 27.2%。建议使用锥形束计算机断层扫描成像测量牙尖区的MRSL,尤其是在臼齿远端化之前。影响MRSL和IRCCP的因素包括不同种族、骨骼形态、面部类型和第三磨牙状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1