Comparison of the sedative and cardiovascular effects of the combination of acepromazine-clonidine versus acepromazine-xylazine in horses.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Veterinary Research Forum Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.30466/vrf.2023.2004451.3910
Pegah Parhizkar, Rahim Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Hashemi-Asl, Ghader Jalilzadeh-Amin, Farshid Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei
{"title":"Comparison of the sedative and cardiovascular effects of the combination of acepromazine-clonidine versus acepromazine-xylazine in horses.","authors":"Pegah Parhizkar, Rahim Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Hashemi-Asl, Ghader Jalilzadeh-Amin, Farshid Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei","doi":"10.30466/vrf.2023.2004451.3910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the sedative and cardiovascular effects of the combination of acepromazine-clonidine versus acepromazine-xylazine in horses. Four healthy cross-bred horses were included in the study. They were assigned to two treatments. In treatment I (T1), the animals received xylazine hydrochloride (1.00 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) in combination with acepromazine maleate (0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) intravenously (IV). In treatment II (T2), the animals received intra-gastric administration of clonidine (0.002 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) followed by acepromazine (0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>; IV) after 60 min. Head height above the ground (HHAG) and echocardiographic indices were evaluated. In T1, recordings were made 5 min before and 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after drug administration. In T2, recordings were made 5 min before clonidine, 55 min after clonidine administration, and then 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after acepromazine injection. Analyses of the data showed there were not significant differences regarding HHAG and echocardiographic indices between two treatments. For sedation of healthy horses, it was concluded that intra-gastric administration of clonidine and IV administration of acepromazine showed similar sedative and cardiovascular effects compared to IV acepromazine-xylazine administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23989,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research Forum","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2023.2004451.3910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the sedative and cardiovascular effects of the combination of acepromazine-clonidine versus acepromazine-xylazine in horses. Four healthy cross-bred horses were included in the study. They were assigned to two treatments. In treatment I (T1), the animals received xylazine hydrochloride (1.00 mg kg-1) in combination with acepromazine maleate (0.05 mg kg-1) intravenously (IV). In treatment II (T2), the animals received intra-gastric administration of clonidine (0.002 mg kg-1) followed by acepromazine (0.05 mg kg-1; IV) after 60 min. Head height above the ground (HHAG) and echocardiographic indices were evaluated. In T1, recordings were made 5 min before and 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after drug administration. In T2, recordings were made 5 min before clonidine, 55 min after clonidine administration, and then 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after acepromazine injection. Analyses of the data showed there were not significant differences regarding HHAG and echocardiographic indices between two treatments. For sedation of healthy horses, it was concluded that intra-gastric administration of clonidine and IV administration of acepromazine showed similar sedative and cardiovascular effects compared to IV acepromazine-xylazine administration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较乙酰丙嗪-氯硝柳胺与乙酰丙嗪-氯硝柳胺复方制剂对马的镇静和心血管作用。
本研究的目的是比较乙酰丙嗪-氯尼替丁(acepromazine-clonidine)与乙酰丙嗪-恶嗪(acepromazine-xylazine)联合用药对马的镇静和心血管作用。研究对象包括四匹健康的杂交马。它们被分配到两种治疗方案中。在治疗 I(T1)中,动物接受盐酸赛拉嗪(1.00 毫克/公斤-1)与马来酸乙酰丙嗪(0.05 毫克/公斤-1)的静脉注射。在处理 II(T2)中,动物在 60 分钟后胃内注射氯尼丁(0.002 毫克/千克),然后静脉注射醋丙嗪(0.05 毫克/千克)。对头部离地高度(HHAG)和超声心动图指数进行评估。在 T1 阶段,分别在用药前 5 分钟和用药后 5、15、30、60 和 90 分钟进行记录。在 T2 阶段,分别在注射氯尼替胺前 5 分钟、注射氯尼替胺后 55 分钟以及注射醋丙嗪后 5、15、30、60 和 90 分钟进行记录。对数据的分析表明,两种治疗方法在 HHAG 和超声心动图指数方面没有显著差异。对于健康马匹的镇静,结论是胃内注射氯硝安定和静脉注射醋丙嗪与静脉注射醋丙嗪-恶嗪相比,镇静和心血管效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Research Forum
Veterinary Research Forum Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Research Forum (VRF) is a quarterly international journal committed to publish worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including anatomy and histology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomic and clinical pathology, parasitology, microbiology, immunology and epidemiology, food hygiene, poultry science, fish and aquaculture, anesthesia and surgery, large and small animal internal medicine, large and small animal reproduction, biotechnology and diagnostic imaging of domestic, companion and farm animals.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the sedative and cardiovascular effects of the combination of acepromazine-clonidine versus acepromazine-xylazine in horses. Development of a multiplexed Luminex assay for simultaneous detection of enteric viruses in cattle. Effects of ultra-filtration purification of infectious bursal disease virus on immune responses and cytokine activation in specific pathogen free chickens. Immediate administration of hTERT-MSCs-IDO1-EVs reduces hypoalbuminemia after spinal cord injury. Pharmacokinetic enhancement of marbofloxacin by alpha-1-monolaurin pre-treatment in broiler chickens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1