Sex Disparities in Applied Force on Maxillary Incisors Among Novices During Laryngoscopy Using a High-Fidelity Simulator: A Prospective Observational Study.

Q3 Medicine Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.24546/0100486397
Yuko Ono, Kazuaki Shinohara, Jiro Shimada, Jun Sugiyama, Shigeaki Inoue, Joji Kotani
{"title":"Sex Disparities in Applied Force on Maxillary Incisors Among Novices During Laryngoscopy Using a High-Fidelity Simulator: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Yuko Ono, Kazuaki Shinohara, Jiro Shimada, Jun Sugiyama, Shigeaki Inoue, Joji Kotani","doi":"10.24546/0100486397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a common and crucial intervention. Whether the performance of ETI differs according to the sex of the laryngoscopist remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess sex disparities in markers of ETI performance among novices using a high-fidelity simulator. This prospective observational study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. Of the 209 students, 64 (30.6%) were female. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope or C-MAC video laryngoscope in combination with a stylet or gum-elastic bougie to perform ETI on a high-fidelity simulator. The primary endpoint was the maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy. The secondary endpoint was the time to ETI. The implanted sensors in the simulator automatically quantified the force and time to ETI. The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was approximately 30% lower in the male than female group for all laryngoscopes and intubation aids examined (all P < 0.001). Similarly, the time to ETI was approximately 10% faster in the male than female group regardless of the types of laryngoscopes and intubation aids used (all P < 0.05). In this study, male sex was associated with a lower maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. A clinical study focusing on sex differences in ETI performance is needed to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":39560,"journal":{"name":"Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"E151-E158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11006240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24546/0100486397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a common and crucial intervention. Whether the performance of ETI differs according to the sex of the laryngoscopist remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess sex disparities in markers of ETI performance among novices using a high-fidelity simulator. This prospective observational study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. Of the 209 students, 64 (30.6%) were female. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope or C-MAC video laryngoscope in combination with a stylet or gum-elastic bougie to perform ETI on a high-fidelity simulator. The primary endpoint was the maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy. The secondary endpoint was the time to ETI. The implanted sensors in the simulator automatically quantified the force and time to ETI. The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was approximately 30% lower in the male than female group for all laryngoscopes and intubation aids examined (all P < 0.001). Similarly, the time to ETI was approximately 10% faster in the male than female group regardless of the types of laryngoscopes and intubation aids used (all P < 0.05). In this study, male sex was associated with a lower maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. A clinical study focusing on sex differences in ETI performance is needed to validate our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用高保真模拟器进行喉内镜检查时,新手上颌切牙所受力的性别差异:一项前瞻性观察研究。
气管内插管(ETI)是一项常见而重要的干预措施。喉镜操作员的性别是否会影响 ETI 的表现仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估使用高保真模拟器的新手在 ETI 表现指标上的性别差异。这项前瞻性观察研究于 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月在一所公立医科大学进行。共招募了 209 名没有临床 ETI 经验的医学生(四年级和五年级)。在这 209 名学生中,有 64 名女生(占 30.6%)。参与者在高保真模拟器上使用 Macintosh 直接喉镜或 C-MAC 视频喉镜,结合支架或胶弹吸嘴进行 ETI。主要终点是喉镜检查时施加在上颌门齿上的最大力量。次要终点是 ETI 的时间。模拟器中的植入式传感器可自动量化作用力和 ETI 时间。在所有接受检查的喉镜和插管辅助工具中,男性组施加在上颌门牙上的最大力量比女性组低约 30%(所有 P < 0.001)。同样,无论使用哪种喉镜和插管辅助工具,男性组的 ETI 时间比女性组快约 10%(所有 P < 0.05)。在这项研究中,在新手进行直接和间接喉镜检查时,男性对上颌切牙施加的最大力量较低。为了验证我们的研究结果,需要进行一项侧重于 ETI 性能性别差异的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences
Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Shear Wave Elastography after Surgery for Congenital Biliary Dilatation. Role of a Home-visit Nursing Agency in Supporting Patients with Heart Failure on Continuous Catecholamine Infusion: A Case Series Study. A Japanese Case of Food Protein-induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Caused by Multiple Seafoods. Comparison over Time of Adverse Drug Reactions in Diabetes Patients Treated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors. Difficulty in Removing a Ureteral Stent post Childbirth due to Encrustation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1