[Whether to implant a defibrillator or not? The Possibility of Using the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score Calculator in Real Practice].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Kardiologiya Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.18087/cardio.2024.2.n2447
N N Ilov, S A Boytsov, A A Nechepurenko
{"title":"[Whether to implant a defibrillator or not? The Possibility of Using the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score Calculator in Real Practice].","authors":"N N Ilov, S A Boytsov, A A Nechepurenko","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2024.2.n2447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the predictive capabilities of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator in assessing the benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included 388 patients with NYHA II-IV functional class chronic heart failure (CHF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 % who underwent ICD placement for the primary prevention of SCD. Patients were followed up for two years to record the endpoints of first-time paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or non-arrhythmic death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the results of calculation with the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator, 276 (71 %) patients had a high risk of VT (score ≥7) and 150 (39 %) had a high risk of non-arrhythmic death (score ≥3). 336 (94%) patients would benefit from an ICD: 148 (38 %) with a high level of probability and 218 (56 %) with a medium level of probability. According to the incidence of endpoints, VT episodes predominated in the low-ICD benefit group (36%), while the high-ICD benefit group had a relatively high incidence of non-arrhythmic death (12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained for a cohort of Russian patients with CHF and reduced LVEF indicated that the use of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in routine clinical practice does not improve the stratification of SCD risk compared to the traditional approach to selecting patients with CHF for ICD based on the LVEF value.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"64 2","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.2.n2447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To study the predictive capabilities of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator in assessing the benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).

Material and methods: This study included 388 patients with NYHA II-IV functional class chronic heart failure (CHF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 % who underwent ICD placement for the primary prevention of SCD. Patients were followed up for two years to record the endpoints of first-time paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or non-arrhythmic death.

Results: According to the results of calculation with the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator, 276 (71 %) patients had a high risk of VT (score ≥7) and 150 (39 %) had a high risk of non-arrhythmic death (score ≥3). 336 (94%) patients would benefit from an ICD: 148 (38 %) with a high level of probability and 218 (56 %) with a medium level of probability. According to the incidence of endpoints, VT episodes predominated in the low-ICD benefit group (36%), while the high-ICD benefit group had a relatively high incidence of non-arrhythmic death (12%).

Conclusion: The results obtained for a cohort of Russian patients with CHF and reduced LVEF indicated that the use of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in routine clinical practice does not improve the stratification of SCD risk compared to the traditional approach to selecting patients with CHF for ICD based on the LVEF value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[是否植入除颤器?在实际应用中使用 MADIT-ICD 效益评分计算器的可能性]。
目的:研究MADIT-ICD获益评分计算器在评估植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)用于心脏性猝死(SCD)一级预防的获益方面的预测能力:该研究纳入了388名左室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的NYHA II-IV功能分级慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者,这些患者接受了ICD置入术,用于SCD的一级预防。对患者进行为期两年的随访,记录首次阵发性持续室性心动过速(VT)或非心律失常死亡的终点:根据 MADIT-ICD 效益评分计算器的计算结果,276 名(71%)患者有 VT 的高风险(评分≥7),150 名(39%)患者有非心律失常死亡的高风险(评分≥3)。336(94%)名患者将从 ICD 中获益:148(38%)名患者有高风险,218(56%)名患者有中风险。根据终点的发生率,VT 发作在低 ICD 受益组中占多数(36%),而高 ICD 受益组的非心律失常死亡发生率相对较高(12%):对一组 LVEF 降低的俄罗斯 CHF 患者的研究结果表明,在常规临床实践中使用 MADIT-ICD 收益评分与根据 LVEF 值为 CHF 患者选择 ICD 的传统方法相比,并不能改善 SCD 风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kardiologiya
Kardiologiya 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: “Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology. As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields. The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords). “Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus. The Journal''s primary objectives Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers. Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums; Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication; Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community; Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.
期刊最新文献
[4‑Year Experience of the Cardio-Oncology Center of Sechenov University: Single-Center Epidemiological Study]. [Changes of the Heart Rhythm in Imbalance of Thyroid Gland Hormones and its Morphology in Outbred Rats]. [Complex Issues in the Management of Pericarditis. In Anticipation of the Release of Updated Recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology]. [Drug-Eluting Stents - a Panacea for Everyone or Not? Commentary on the Paper «Perioperative Myocardial Infarction and Successful Revascularization in Patient With Primary Metasynchronic Rectal, Gastric and Bladder Cancer»]. [Free Immunoglobulin Light Chains in Patients With Myocarditis: a New Biomarker of Inflammation and Heart Failure].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1