Comparison of pain relief in soft tissue tumor excision: anesthetic injection using an automatic digital injector versus conventional injection.

Q2 Medicine Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.7181/acfs.2023.00542
Hye Gwang Mun, Bo Min Moon, Yu Jin Kim
{"title":"Comparison of pain relief in soft tissue tumor excision: anesthetic injection using an automatic digital injector versus conventional injection.","authors":"Hye Gwang Mun, Bo Min Moon, Yu Jin Kim","doi":"10.7181/acfs.2023.00542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pain caused by local anesthetic injection can lead to patient anxiety prior to surgery, potentially necessitating sedation or general anesthesia during the excision procedure. In this study, we aim to compare the pain relief efficacy and safety of using a digital automatic anesthetic injector for local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three patients undergoing excision of a benign soft tissue tumor under local anesthesia were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to February 2022. A single-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups by randomization: the experimental group with digital automatic anesthetic injector method (I-JECT group) and the control group with conventional injection method. Before surgery, the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety information scale was used to measure the patients' anxiety. After local anesthetic was administered, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to measure the pain. The amount of anesthetic used was divided by the surface area of the lesion was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen were assigned to the conventional group and 16 to the I-JECT group. The mean Numeric Pain Rating Scale was 1.75 in the I-JECT group and 3.82 in conventional group. The injection pain was lower in the I-JECT group (p< 0.01). The mean Amsterdam preoperative anxiety information scale was 11.00 in the I-JECT group and 9.65 in conventional group. Patient's anxiety did not correlate to injection pain regardless of the method of injection (p= 0.47). The amount of local anesthetic used per 1 cm 2 of tumor surface area was 0.74 mL/cm2 in the I-JECT group and 2.31 mL/cm2 in the conventional group. The normalization amount of local anesthetic was less in the I-JECT group (p< 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a digital automatic anesthetic injector has shown to reduce pain and the amount of local anesthetics without complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":52238,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2023.00542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pain caused by local anesthetic injection can lead to patient anxiety prior to surgery, potentially necessitating sedation or general anesthesia during the excision procedure. In this study, we aim to compare the pain relief efficacy and safety of using a digital automatic anesthetic injector for local anesthesia.

Methods: Thirty-three patients undergoing excision of a benign soft tissue tumor under local anesthesia were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to February 2022. A single-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups by randomization: the experimental group with digital automatic anesthetic injector method (I-JECT group) and the control group with conventional injection method. Before surgery, the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety information scale was used to measure the patients' anxiety. After local anesthetic was administered, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to measure the pain. The amount of anesthetic used was divided by the surface area of the lesion was recorded.

Results: Seventeen were assigned to the conventional group and 16 to the I-JECT group. The mean Numeric Pain Rating Scale was 1.75 in the I-JECT group and 3.82 in conventional group. The injection pain was lower in the I-JECT group (p< 0.01). The mean Amsterdam preoperative anxiety information scale was 11.00 in the I-JECT group and 9.65 in conventional group. Patient's anxiety did not correlate to injection pain regardless of the method of injection (p= 0.47). The amount of local anesthetic used per 1 cm 2 of tumor surface area was 0.74 mL/cm2 in the I-JECT group and 2.31 mL/cm2 in the conventional group. The normalization amount of local anesthetic was less in the I-JECT group (p< 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of complications.

Conclusion: The use of a digital automatic anesthetic injector has shown to reduce pain and the amount of local anesthetics without complication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较软组织肿瘤切除术中的镇痛效果:使用自动数字注射器注射麻醉剂与传统注射法。
背景:局部麻醉注射引起的疼痛可能会导致患者在术前焦虑,从而可能需要在切除手术过程中使用镇静剂或全身麻醉。本研究旨在比较使用数字式自动麻醉注射器进行局部麻醉的镇痛效果和安全性:方法:从 2021 年 9 月到 2022 年 2 月,我们前瞻性地招募了 33 名在局部麻醉下接受良性软组织肿瘤切除术的患者。该研究为单盲随机对照研究。患者被随机分为两组:采用数字自动麻醉注射器方法的实验组(I-JECT 组)和采用传统注射方法的对照组。手术前,采用阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑信息量表测量患者的焦虑程度。注射局麻药后,使用数字疼痛评分量表测量疼痛程度。记录麻醉剂用量除以病变表面积:17人被分配到传统组,16人被分配到I-JECT组。I-JECT 组的数字疼痛评分量表平均值为 1.75,传统组为 3.82。I-JECT 组的注射疼痛较低(P< 0.01)。I-JECT 组的阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑信息量表平均值为 11.00,传统组为 9.65。无论采用哪种注射方法,患者的焦虑与注射疼痛无关(p= 0.47)。每 1 cm 2 肿瘤表面积的局麻药用量,I-JECT 组为 0.74 mL/cm2,传统组为 2.31 mL/cm2。I-JECT 组的局麻药正常化用量较少(P< 0.01)。并发症的发生率没有差异:结论:使用数字式自动麻醉注射器可减轻疼痛,减少局麻药用量,且无并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
In-house dental lab-based cranial prosthesis fabrication: a technical note. Treatment of a lip defect in a patient with choreaacanthocytosis using a combination of surgical and adjuvant onabotulinumtoxinA therapy: a case report. Surgical correction of facial bone deformity and enophthalmos after tripod fracture using an acellular dermal matrix: a case report. Successful surgical interventions for a giant and complicated myoepithelial carcinoma: a case report. Intraosseous vascular malformation of the skull: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1