What Mathematics Content Do Teachers Teach? Optimizing Measurement of Opportunities to Learn in the Classroom

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1111/emip.12603
Jiahui Zhang, William H. Schmidt
{"title":"What Mathematics Content Do Teachers Teach? Optimizing Measurement of Opportunities to Learn in the Classroom","authors":"Jiahui Zhang,&nbsp;William H. Schmidt","doi":"10.1111/emip.12603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring opportunities to learn (OTL) is crucial for evaluating education quality and equity, but obtaining accurate and comprehensive OTL data at a large scale remains challenging. We attempt to address this issue by investigating measurement concerns in data collection and sampling. With the primary goal of estimating group-level OTLs for large populations of classrooms and the secondary goal of estimating classroom-level OTLs, we propose forming a teacher panel and using an online log-type survey to collect content and time data on sampled days throughout the school year. We compared various sampling schemes in a simulation study with real daily log data from 66 fourth-grade math teachers. The findings from this study indicate that sampling 1 day per week or 1 day every other week provided accurate group-level estimates, while sampling 1 day per week yielded satisfactory classroom-level estimates. The proposed approach aids in effectively monitoring large-scale classroom OTL.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"43 2","pages":"40-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emip.12603","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring opportunities to learn (OTL) is crucial for evaluating education quality and equity, but obtaining accurate and comprehensive OTL data at a large scale remains challenging. We attempt to address this issue by investigating measurement concerns in data collection and sampling. With the primary goal of estimating group-level OTLs for large populations of classrooms and the secondary goal of estimating classroom-level OTLs, we propose forming a teacher panel and using an online log-type survey to collect content and time data on sampled days throughout the school year. We compared various sampling schemes in a simulation study with real daily log data from 66 fourth-grade math teachers. The findings from this study indicate that sampling 1 day per week or 1 day every other week provided accurate group-level estimates, while sampling 1 day per week yielded satisfactory classroom-level estimates. The proposed approach aids in effectively monitoring large-scale classroom OTL.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师教授哪些数学内容?优化课堂学习机会的衡量标准
衡量学习机会(OTL)对于评估教育质量和公平性至关重要,但在大规模范围内获取准确、全面的 OTL 数据仍具有挑战性。我们试图通过调查数据收集和抽样中的测量问题来解决这一问题。我们的主要目标是估算大量教室的组级 OTL,次要目标是估算教室级 OTL,因此我们建议组建一个教师小组,并使用在线日志型调查来收集整个学年中抽样日的内容和时间数据。我们利用 66 位四年级数学教师的真实每日日志数据,在模拟研究中比较了各种抽样方案。研究结果表明,每周抽样 1 天或每隔一周抽样 1 天可提供准确的组级估计数据,而每周抽样 1 天可提供令人满意的班级估计数据。建议的方法有助于有效监测大规模课堂 OTL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Issue Cover On the Cover: Gendered Trajectories of Digital Literacy Development: Insights from a Longitudinal Cohort Study Digital Module 36: Applying Intersectionality Theory to Educational Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1