Efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19: Insights from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5414/CP204497
Guoying Kao, Yunlin Chen, Jinqi Fan
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19: Insights from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Guoying Kao, Yunlin Chen, Jinqi Fan","doi":"10.5414/CP204497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 induces a pro-coagulant state with thrombotic events. This meta-analysis explores the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet-based therapy in COVID-19 patients through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search until March 10, 2023, identified 7 RCTs involving 23,415 inpatients. Of these, 11,891 received antiplatelet-based treatment, and 11,524 received placebo/other drugs. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included trials involved patients with a mean age ranging from 54.3 to 62.0 years and a prevalence of hypertension ranging from 10.9 to 65.0% and coronary artery disease ranging from 3.2 to 32.7%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality between groups (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.01, p = 0.76). However, antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced major thrombotic events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.99, p = 0.04). Conversely, it increased major bleeding risks (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24 - 2.12, p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation and respiratory death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antiplatelet therapy does not confer mortality benefit in COVID-19 patients but lowers major thrombotic events while increasing major bleeding risks. Ongoing large RCTs will provide more information on the therapeutic value of this therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 induces a pro-coagulant state with thrombotic events. This meta-analysis explores the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet-based therapy in COVID-19 patients through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search until March 10, 2023, identified 7 RCTs involving 23,415 inpatients. Of these, 11,891 received antiplatelet-based treatment, and 11,524 received placebo/other drugs. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results: The included trials involved patients with a mean age ranging from 54.3 to 62.0 years and a prevalence of hypertension ranging from 10.9 to 65.0% and coronary artery disease ranging from 3.2 to 32.7%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality between groups (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.01, p = 0.76). However, antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced major thrombotic events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.99, p = 0.04). Conversely, it increased major bleeding risks (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24 - 2.12, p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation and respiratory death.

Conclusion: Antiplatelet therapy does not confer mortality benefit in COVID-19 patients but lowers major thrombotic events while increasing major bleeding risks. Ongoing large RCTs will provide more information on the therapeutic value of this therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19中抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验荟萃分析的启示。
背景:COVID-19会诱发促凝血状态和血栓事件。本荟萃分析通过随机对照试验(RCT)探讨了COVID-19患者抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性:截至2023年3月10日的系统性文献检索共发现了7项随机对照试验,涉及23415名住院患者。其中 11,891 人接受了抗血小板治疗,11,524 人接受了安慰剂/其他药物治疗。使用Review Manager 5.4进行了统计分析:纳入试验的患者平均年龄为 54.3 岁至 62.0 岁,高血压患病率为 10.9% 至 65.0%,冠状动脉疾病患病率为 3.2% 至 32.7%。汇总分析显示,不同组间的总死亡率无明显差异(RR 1.0,95% CI 0.99 - 1.01,P = 0.76)。不过,抗血小板治疗可显著减少重大血栓事件(RR 0.86,95% CI 0.75 - 0.99,P = 0.04)。相反,它增加了大出血风险(RR 1.62,95% CI 1.24 - 2.12,p = 0.0005)。有创机械通气和呼吸死亡的发生率没有明显差异:结论:抗血小板治疗并不能降低COVID-19患者的死亡率,但能降低主要血栓事件的发生率,同时增加大出血风险。正在进行的大型 RCT 研究将为该疗法的治疗价值提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Skin adhesion of a newly developed, bioequivalent rotigotine patch formulation in comparison to the originator product: Results of a multi-center, randomized, crossover trial in patients with Parkinson's disease. Rational use of short-term anorectic drugs for one-year effective treatment of obesity: An analysis of four studies. Adequate IVIG dosing is associated with an improved long-term outcome in secondary immunodeficiency: A prospective, non-interventional study. Pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence, and safety assessments of two brands of 30-mg nifedipine controlled-release formulations in Chinese healthy subjects. Pulmonary fibrosis insights and therapy targets from disease models and administration of the lipophilic diterpene, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate: Review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1