A Model Predicting the 6-Month Disability of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury to Assess the Quality of Care in Intensive Care Units: Results from the CREACTIVE Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0529
Giovanni Nattino, Stanley Lemeshow, Greta Carrara, Carlotta Rossi, Obou Brissy, Arturo Chieregato, Akos Csomos, Joanne M Fleming, Aimone Giugni, Primoz Gradisek, Rafael Kaps, Theodoros Kyprianou, Isaac Lazar, Malgorzata Mikaszewska-Sokolewicz, Giulia Paci, Nektaria Xirouchaki, Guido Bertolini
{"title":"A Model Predicting the 6-Month Disability of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury to Assess the Quality of Care in Intensive Care Units: Results from the CREACTIVE Study.","authors":"Giovanni Nattino, Stanley Lemeshow, Greta Carrara, Carlotta Rossi, Obou Brissy, Arturo Chieregato, Akos Csomos, Joanne M Fleming, Aimone Giugni, Primoz Gradisek, Rafael Kaps, Theodoros Kyprianou, Isaac Lazar, Malgorzata Mikaszewska-Sokolewicz, Giulia Paci, Nektaria Xirouchaki, Guido Bertolini","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing quality of care is essential for improving the management of patients experiencing traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed at devising a rigorous framework to evaluate the quality of TBI care provided by intensive care units (ICUs) and applying it to the Collaborative Research on Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CREACTIVE) consortium, which involved 83 ICUs from seven countries. The performance of the centers was assessed in terms of patients' outcomes, as measured by the 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). To account for the between-center differences in the characteristics of the admitted patients, we developed a multinomial logistic regression model estimating the probability of a four-level categorization of the GOS-E: good recovery (GR), moderate disability (MD), severe disability (SD), and death or vegetative state (D/VS). A total of 5928 patients admitted to the participating ICUs between March 2014 and March 2019 were analyzed. The model included 11 predictors and demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve in the validation set for GR: 0.836, MD: 0.802, SD: 0.706, D/VS: 0.890) and calibration, both overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow test <i>p</i> value: 0.87) and in several subgroups, defined by prognostically relevant variables. The model was used as a benchmark for assessing quality of care by comparing the observed number of patients experiencing GR, MD, SD, and D/VS to the corresponding numbers expected in each category by the model, computing observed/expected (O/E) ratios. The four center-specific ratios were assembled with polar representations and used to provide a multidimensional assessment of the ICUs, overcoming the loss of information consequent to the traditional dichotomizations of the outcome in TBI research. The proposed framework can help in identifying strengths and weaknesses of current TBI care, triggering the changes that are necessary to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"e1948-e1960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0529","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing quality of care is essential for improving the management of patients experiencing traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed at devising a rigorous framework to evaluate the quality of TBI care provided by intensive care units (ICUs) and applying it to the Collaborative Research on Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CREACTIVE) consortium, which involved 83 ICUs from seven countries. The performance of the centers was assessed in terms of patients' outcomes, as measured by the 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). To account for the between-center differences in the characteristics of the admitted patients, we developed a multinomial logistic regression model estimating the probability of a four-level categorization of the GOS-E: good recovery (GR), moderate disability (MD), severe disability (SD), and death or vegetative state (D/VS). A total of 5928 patients admitted to the participating ICUs between March 2014 and March 2019 were analyzed. The model included 11 predictors and demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve in the validation set for GR: 0.836, MD: 0.802, SD: 0.706, D/VS: 0.890) and calibration, both overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p value: 0.87) and in several subgroups, defined by prognostically relevant variables. The model was used as a benchmark for assessing quality of care by comparing the observed number of patients experiencing GR, MD, SD, and D/VS to the corresponding numbers expected in each category by the model, computing observed/expected (O/E) ratios. The four center-specific ratios were assembled with polar representations and used to provide a multidimensional assessment of the ICUs, overcoming the loss of information consequent to the traditional dichotomizations of the outcome in TBI research. The proposed framework can help in identifying strengths and weaknesses of current TBI care, triggering the changes that are necessary to improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脑损伤患者 6 个月残疾预测模型,用于评估重症监护病房的护理质量:CREACTIVE研究的结果。
评估护理质量对于改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的管理至关重要。本研究旨在设计一个严格的框架,用于评估重症监护室(ICU)提供的创伤性脑损伤护理质量,并将其应用于CREACTIVE联盟,该联盟包括来自7个国家的83个重症监护室。各中心的绩效是根据患者的治疗效果进行评估的,治疗效果是通过 6 个月的格拉斯哥治疗效果量表扩展版(GOS-E)来衡量的。为了考虑各中心之间入院患者特征的差异,我们建立了一个多二项逻辑回归模型,估算GOS-E四级分类的概率:良好恢复(GR)、中度残疾(MD)、重度残疾(SD)和死亡或植物人状态(D/VS)。研究分析了 2014 年 3 月至 2019 年 3 月期间参与研究的重症监护病房共收治的 5928 名患者。该模型包括 11 个预测因子,在整体上(Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 p 值:0.87)和几个由预后相关变量定义的亚组中都表现出良好的区分度(验证集中 GR 的 ROC 曲线下面积:0.836;MD:0.802;SD:0.706;D/VS:0.890)和校准性。通过比较观察到的 GR、MD、SD 和 D/VS 患者人数与模型预期的各类患者人数,计算观察/预期 (O/E) 比率,该模型被用作评估护理质量的基准。四个中心的特定比率用极性表示法组合起来,用于对重症监护室进行多维评估,克服了创伤性脑损伤研究中传统的结果二分法所造成的信息缺失。所提出的框架有助于确定当前创伤性脑损伤治疗的优缺点,从而引发必要的变革,改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Identification of a Therapeutic Window for Neurovascular Unit Repair after Experimental Spinal Cord Injury. Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury. Altered Dynamic Brain Functional Network Connectivity Related to Visual Network in Spinal Cord Injury. Genetic Differences Modify Anesthetic Preconditioning of Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila. Measuring Self-Efficacy for Concussion Recovery: Psychometric Characteristics of the Progressive Activities of Controlled Exertion-Self-Efficacy Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1