Intuition and we-ness in Bion and post-Bionian field theory.

IF 1.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS International Journal of Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1080/00207578.2023.2247051
Giuseppe Civitarese
{"title":"Intuition and <i>we-ness</i> in Bion and post-Bionian field theory.","authors":"Giuseppe Civitarese","doi":"10.1080/00207578.2023.2247051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Intuition\" is probably the most frequently used term in all Bion's writings. However, in order to understand its role in his thought it is essential to give it the clearest possible definition. The thesis of this article is that by <i>intuition</i> Bion means a \"specific\" psychoanalytic concept. It is thus possible to extract intuition from the vague and mystifying reading of it by some authors, whic runs the risk of falling into an empty \"intuitionism\". For Bion, intuition is a psychoanalytic function of the analyst, the principal factors of which are the various expressions of dream-thought and insight. Furthermore, within the frame of the post-Bionian theory of the analytic field, the author suggests adding to these factors the use of the \"we\" vertex (or <i>we-ness</i>), i.e. to regard virtually every fact of analysis as co-created. The aim is to make the very concept of \"field\" more accessible. Compared with the metaphor of the analytic field, the concept of we-ness has both greater clinical versatility and greater pregnancy on the metapsychological plane. Indeed, it more directly reflects a radically social conception of human subjectivity: what is known in contemporary speculative thought - in J-L. Nancy, for example - as the \"ontology of we\".</p>","PeriodicalId":48022,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2023.2247051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Intuition" is probably the most frequently used term in all Bion's writings. However, in order to understand its role in his thought it is essential to give it the clearest possible definition. The thesis of this article is that by intuition Bion means a "specific" psychoanalytic concept. It is thus possible to extract intuition from the vague and mystifying reading of it by some authors, whic runs the risk of falling into an empty "intuitionism". For Bion, intuition is a psychoanalytic function of the analyst, the principal factors of which are the various expressions of dream-thought and insight. Furthermore, within the frame of the post-Bionian theory of the analytic field, the author suggests adding to these factors the use of the "we" vertex (or we-ness), i.e. to regard virtually every fact of analysis as co-created. The aim is to make the very concept of "field" more accessible. Compared with the metaphor of the analytic field, the concept of we-ness has both greater clinical versatility and greater pregnancy on the metapsychological plane. Indeed, it more directly reflects a radically social conception of human subjectivity: what is known in contemporary speculative thought - in J-L. Nancy, for example - as the "ontology of we".

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比昂和后比昂场论中的直觉和我们性。
在比昂的所有著作中,"直觉 "可能是使用频率最高的术语。然而,为了理解它在比昂思想中的作用,有必要给它一个尽可能清晰的定义。本文的论点是,比昂所说的 "直觉 "指的是一个 "特定的 "精神分析概念。因此,我们有可能从某些作者对直觉的模糊而神秘的解读中提炼出直觉,而这种解读有可能陷入空洞的 "直觉主义"。在比昂看来,直觉是分析家的一种精神分析功能,其主要因素是梦的思维和洞察力的各种表现形式。此外,在后比昂分析领域理论的框架内,作者建议在这些因素中加入 "我们 "顶点(或我们性)的使用,即把几乎所有的分析事实视为共同创造的。这样做的目的是使 "领域 "这一概念更易于理解。与 "分析领域 "的隐喻相比,"我们性 "的概念在临床上具有更大的通用性,在元心理学层面上也具有更大的包容性。事实上,它更直接地反映了人类主体性的一种根本性的社会概念:即当代推测性思想中的 "我们性"(we-ness)--例如在南希(J-L.南希(J-L. Nancy)等人所说的 "我们本体论"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychoanalysis
International Journal of Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: It is the only psychoanalytic journal regularly publishing extensive contributions by authors throughout the world - facilitated by a system of international editorial boards and the policy of allowing submission and review in all main European languages, followed by translation of accepted papers at the Journal"s expense. We publish contributions on Methodology, Psychoanalytic Theory & Technique, The History of Psychoanalysis, Clinical Contributions, Research and Life-Cycle Development, Education & Professional Issues, Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, and Interdisciplinary Studies. The Journal also publishes the main papers and panel reports from the International Psychoanalytical Association"s Congresses, book reviews, obituaries, and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Mourning, melancholia and machines: An applied psychoanalytic investigation of mourning in the age of griefbots. Differentiating between romantic and mature love: Revisiting the three caskets. Discussion of "The older analyst at work: The old man and the sea?" Discussion of "The older analyst at work: The old man and the sea?" Editorial: Remembering Dana Birksted-Breen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1