[Health Promotion and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases by Public Health Departments in Baden-Württemberg during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an Online Survey].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2227-5481
Achim Siegel, Daniela Hesmert, Jasmin Mangold, Anika Klein, David Häske, Sofie Wössner, Monika A Rieger, Stefanie Joos, Cornelia Mahler
{"title":"[Health Promotion and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases by Public Health Departments in Baden-Württemberg during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an Online Survey].","authors":"Achim Siegel, Daniela Hesmert, Jasmin Mangold, Anika Klein, David Häske, Sofie Wössner, Monika A Rieger, Stefanie Joos, Cornelia Mahler","doi":"10.1055/a-2227-5481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disease prevention and health promotion are among the core tasks of German public health services (Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst - ÖGD), particularly local public health departments (Gesundheitsämter). Little is known about the extent to which the departments were able to continue activities in the field of health promotion and prevention of non-communicable diseases (HPP-NCDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the example of public health departments in Baden-Württemberg (BW), we therefore investigated how much staff was available to the departments for HPP-NCDs services, how much staff was actually dedicated to HPP-NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, which HPP-NCDs activities were carried out during the pandemic, which were cancelled, and which should be resumed as a priority, according to the public health departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a largely standardized online questionnaire for the survey of the 38 public health departments in BW. Per department one questionnaire was to be completed. The survey took place from 9/1/2022 to 11/4/2022. The data of this explorative cross-sectional study were analyzed in a descriptive-statistical manner using SPSS, version 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 38 departments, 34 participated in the survey (89%). Departments had a mean of 2.44 full HPP-NCDs staff as planned (median 2.00; SD 1.41; range 0.20-5.00). Under pandemic conditions, a mean of 1.23 full HPP-NCDs staff were deployed (median 0.95; SD 1.24; range 0.00-4.50). Respondents gave examples of 61 HPP-NCDs activities that were conducted under pandemic conditions, and they described 69 HPP-NCDs activities that had to be cancelled. Of the latter, respondents felt that 40 should be resumed as a matter of highest priority. Analysis of the priority activities to be resumed reveals characteristic differences: e. g., resumption of structural prevention activities was viewed more frequently as a matter of hightest priority than resumption of behavioral prevention activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the pandemic, local public health departments in BW deployed, on average, actually only half of their full staff allocated as planned to HPP-NCDs. Comparing different categories of HPP-NCDs activities (cancelled during the pandemic) in terms of the relative frequency with which their resumption is viewed as matter of highest priority, characteristic differences can be observed. It remains an open question which conclusions can be drawn from such differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11248641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2227-5481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Disease prevention and health promotion are among the core tasks of German public health services (Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst - ÖGD), particularly local public health departments (Gesundheitsämter). Little is known about the extent to which the departments were able to continue activities in the field of health promotion and prevention of non-communicable diseases (HPP-NCDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the example of public health departments in Baden-Württemberg (BW), we therefore investigated how much staff was available to the departments for HPP-NCDs services, how much staff was actually dedicated to HPP-NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, which HPP-NCDs activities were carried out during the pandemic, which were cancelled, and which should be resumed as a priority, according to the public health departments.

Methods: We developed a largely standardized online questionnaire for the survey of the 38 public health departments in BW. Per department one questionnaire was to be completed. The survey took place from 9/1/2022 to 11/4/2022. The data of this explorative cross-sectional study were analyzed in a descriptive-statistical manner using SPSS, version 28.

Results: Of the 38 departments, 34 participated in the survey (89%). Departments had a mean of 2.44 full HPP-NCDs staff as planned (median 2.00; SD 1.41; range 0.20-5.00). Under pandemic conditions, a mean of 1.23 full HPP-NCDs staff were deployed (median 0.95; SD 1.24; range 0.00-4.50). Respondents gave examples of 61 HPP-NCDs activities that were conducted under pandemic conditions, and they described 69 HPP-NCDs activities that had to be cancelled. Of the latter, respondents felt that 40 should be resumed as a matter of highest priority. Analysis of the priority activities to be resumed reveals characteristic differences: e. g., resumption of structural prevention activities was viewed more frequently as a matter of hightest priority than resumption of behavioral prevention activities.

Conclusions: During the pandemic, local public health departments in BW deployed, on average, actually only half of their full staff allocated as planned to HPP-NCDs. Comparing different categories of HPP-NCDs activities (cancelled during the pandemic) in terms of the relative frequency with which their resumption is viewed as matter of highest priority, characteristic differences can be observed. It remains an open question which conclusions can be drawn from such differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[巴登一符腾堡州公共卫生部门在 COVID-19 大流行期间促进健康和预防非传染性疾病:在线调查结果]。
目的:疾病预防和健康促进是德国公共卫生服务机构(Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst - ÖGD),尤其是地方公共卫生部门(Gesundheitsämter)的核心任务之一。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这些部门能够在多大程度上继续开展促进健康和预防非传染性疾病(HPP-NCDs)领域的活动,人们对此知之甚少。因此,我们以巴登-符腾堡州(BW)的公共卫生部门为例,调查了这些部门有多少人员可用于 HPP-NCDs 服务,在 COVID-19 大流行期间实际有多少人员专门从事 HPP-NCDs 工作,公共卫生部门认为在大流行期间开展了哪些 HPP-NCDs 活动,取消了哪些活动,以及应优先恢复哪些活动:我们制作了一份基本标准化的在线问卷,用于对波黑的 38 个公共卫生部门进行调查。每个部门只需填写一份问卷。调查时间为 2022 年 1 月 9 日至 2022 年 4 月 11 日。这项探索性横断面研究的数据采用 SPSS 28 版进行描述性统计分析:在 38 个部门中,有 34 个部门(89%)参与了调查。各部门按计划平均配备了 2.44 名全职 HPP-NCDs 人员(中位数为 2.00;标度为 1.41;范围为 0.20-5.00)。在大流行情况下,平均部署了 1.23 名 HPP-NCDs 全员(中位数 0.95;标 准差 1.24;范围 0.00-4.50)。受访者举例说明了 61 项在大流行条件下开展的 HPP-NCDs 活动,并描述了 69 项不得不取消的 HPP-NCDs 活动。在后者中,答复者认为有 40 项应作为最优先事项恢复。对优先恢复的活动进行分析后发现,这些活动之间存在差异:例如,恢复结构性预防活动比恢复行为预防活动更常被视为最优先事项:在大流行期间,波罗的海地区的地方公共卫生部门平均部署的 HPP-NCD 人员实际上仅占其按计划分配的全部人员的一半。通过比较不同类别的 HPP-NCDs 活动(在大流行期间被取消)在恢复这些活动时被视为最优先事项的相对频率,可以发现它们之间存在着明显的差异。从这些差异中可以得出什么结论,仍是一个未决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF]. [Rehabilitation Recommendations According to § 31 SGB XI: Empiricism, Discussion and Health Policy Implications]. [The Effect of Service Concentration on Outcome Quality in Obstetrics Departments - An Empirical Analysis of Newborn Mortality in German Hospitals]. [Development Of Long-Term Care Dependency And Utilisation Of Long-Term Care Services From 2017 To 2022 In Germany, Saxony-Anhalt: Analysis Of Health Insurance Data]. [Subjective Health Impairment And Associated Factors In The Heatwave Of Summer 2022: An Online Survey].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1