[The morbidity of the posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting could be an overestimated fact. Study in patients with open posterolateral lumbar fusion].

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2023-11-01
M Cristiani-Winer, P Nicolás-Ortiz, D Orosco-Falcone, J H Guimbard-Pérez, J C Carabajal
{"title":"[The morbidity of the posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting could be an overestimated fact. Study in patients with open posterolateral lumbar fusion].","authors":"M Cristiani-Winer, P Nicolás-Ortiz, D Orosco-Falcone, J H Guimbard-Pérez, J C Carabajal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>spinal fusion is used to treat, among other pathologies, the degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Autologous iliac crest bone grafting is the golden standard treatment for increasing the rate of fusion; however, it isn't free of complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to investigate whether patients who have posterior iliac crest graft harvesting and are blinded to the donor site, can identify from which side the graft was harvested, and whether the intensity of this pain is related to the amount of graft obtained.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>prospective, experimental, randomized and comparative, single-blind study. Adult patients who underwent primary instrumented open posterolateral lumbar fusion with autologous iliac crest bone graft between July 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two randomized groups. The amount of graft to be harvested was according to surgical needs. The patients were asked about pain according to the visual analogue scale in the first, third and sixth months after surgery, always requesting that the most painful side be identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 44 patients (n = 23 right crest, n = 21 left crest) were analyzed. Most patients were unable to identify the side from which the bone graft was harvested, with a statistically significant difference (p-value 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iliac crest bone graft harvesting is an effective and safe procedure that improves the rates of fusion without increasing the patient's morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"37 6","pages":"338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: spinal fusion is used to treat, among other pathologies, the degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Autologous iliac crest bone grafting is the golden standard treatment for increasing the rate of fusion; however, it isn't free of complications.

Objectives: to investigate whether patients who have posterior iliac crest graft harvesting and are blinded to the donor site, can identify from which side the graft was harvested, and whether the intensity of this pain is related to the amount of graft obtained.

Material and methods: prospective, experimental, randomized and comparative, single-blind study. Adult patients who underwent primary instrumented open posterolateral lumbar fusion with autologous iliac crest bone graft between July 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two randomized groups. The amount of graft to be harvested was according to surgical needs. The patients were asked about pain according to the visual analogue scale in the first, third and sixth months after surgery, always requesting that the most painful side be identified.

Results: a total of 44 patients (n = 23 right crest, n = 21 left crest) were analyzed. Most patients were unable to identify the side from which the bone graft was harvested, with a statistically significant difference (p-value 0.0001).

Conclusion: iliac crest bone graft harvesting is an effective and safe procedure that improves the rates of fusion without increasing the patient's morbidity.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[髂嵴后植骨的发病率可能被高估。对开放式腰椎后外侧融合术患者的研究]。
导言:脊柱融合术主要用于治疗椎间盘退行性病变。材料与方法:前瞻性、实验性、随机对比、单盲研究。纳入2019年7月至2020年4月期间接受初次器械开放后外侧腰椎融合术并行自体髂嵴植骨的成人患者。患者被随机分为两组。移植量根据手术需要而定。在术后第一、第三和第六个月,根据视觉模拟量表询问患者疼痛情况,并始终要求确定最疼痛的一侧。结果:共分析了 44 例患者(n = 23 右嵴,n = 21 左嵴)。结论:髂嵴植骨术是一种有效、安全的手术,可提高融合率,但不会增加患者的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[At 75 years of the birth of the Mexican Orthopedic Act]. [Autologous hamstring versus quadriceps graft in anterior cruciate ligament plasty. Comparative study with focus on Return-To-Sport]. [Complications in total hip arthroplasty with double mobility prosthesis: Experience in a third level hospital]. [Efficacy of single-dose preoperative tranexamic acid to prevent blood loss in total hip and knee joint replacement]. [Is early discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty a risk factor for the development of complications, readmissions and unscheduled consultations?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1