The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy by Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams (review)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1353/abr.2023.a921774
Jessi Rae Morton
{"title":"The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy by Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams (review)","authors":"Jessi Rae Morton","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a921774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy</em> by Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jessi Rae Morton (bio) </li> </ul> <em><small>the story of nfts: artists, technology, and democracy</small></em> Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams<br/> Rizzoli Electa<br/> https://www.rizzoliusa.com/book/9780847899364<br/> 144 pages; Print, $32.50 <p>In <em>The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy</em>, Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams provide a thoughtful and well-designed overview of the role of NFTs (non-fungible tokens) in the art world as well as the relationships between NFTs and art history. The authors acknowledge often that NFTs are relatively new and that therefore the book can offer little in terms of future predictions or assertions about the long-term effects of NFTs on artists and art markets. Instead, Whitaker and Abrams seek to engage with numerous questions about blockchain technologies—including NFTs and DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations). To address such questions, some definitions are necessary; Whitaker and Abrams cover key concepts and terms early in the book, and they also provide an appendix that walks the reader through the process of minting an NFT. The appendix defines and explains platforms, protocols, wallets, keys, and smart contracts—all concepts that are mentioned earlier in the book, but with which some readers may prefer to spend additional time. <em>The Story of NFTs</em> is not exhaustively entry-level; readers who are already familiar with the basics of NFTs and block-chain technology will still find much to learn, and less familiar readers will get quick, direct definitions that allow them to move on to the more interesting, though less technical, aspects of the topic. <em>The Story of NFTs</em> is predominantly interested in the relationship between NFTs, blockchain technology, and visual arts, and so the technological elements—though important and duly attended to—do not take over the book.</p> <p>The book's introduction calls attention to two key moments in recent art history—the Association of Art Museum Directors COVID-19-related decision to loosen sales restrictions on museums for two years and the March 2021 sale of Beeple's NFT <em>Everydays: The First 5000 Days</em> for over $69 million. These two events serve to characterize recent disruption within the art world, <strong>[End Page 17]</strong> but they are not the source of the disruption. Whitaker and Abrams point to these moments to illustrate how NFTs moved to the forefront of art discussions in the past few years, then trace the history from which these moments grew. They set out to \"understand NFTs not as an alien landing but instead as part of the history of art.\" When considered in this light, NFTs appear as a development in the art world rather than an incursion by finance or technology outsiders.</p> <p>The authors' positioning of NFTs within the larger scope of art history is particularly effective when they connect older art practices and concepts with the capabilities of NFTs. For example, \"the Artist's Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement, a 1971 document created by Seth Siegelaub and Robert Projansky and commonly referred to as the Artist's Contract or the Siegelaub-Projansky Agreement,\" provides artists with resale royalties along with options for control of future exhibitions. Historically, though, most artists have not been able to secure such extensive control over their work. With smart contracts, on the other hand, NFTs can automate resale royalties for artists, and the intellectual property parameters associated with a particular platform or NFT may limit how a purchaser can use the artwork. Furthermore, artists could use DAOs to pool their resources, and \"it would be possible to create a retirement investment trust using fractional shares or resale royalties.\" Such innovations have the potential to \"automate processes that were previously too cumbersome bureaucratically.\" The possibilities certainly sound promising, but it seems we will have to wait and see whether they are effective in practice.</p> <p>Another particularly interesting example of a connection between NFTs and earlier art practice is the concept of a certificate of authenticity traced back to Sol LeWitt's wall drawings. Rather than prioritizing the paintings themselves, LeWitt's certificates supply instructions for the artwork, and the holder of the certificate is the owner of the artwork. This...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a921774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy by Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams
  • Jessi Rae Morton (bio)
the story of nfts: artists, technology, and democracy Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams
Rizzoli Electa
https://www.rizzoliusa.com/book/9780847899364
144 pages; Print, $32.50

In The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy, Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams provide a thoughtful and well-designed overview of the role of NFTs (non-fungible tokens) in the art world as well as the relationships between NFTs and art history. The authors acknowledge often that NFTs are relatively new and that therefore the book can offer little in terms of future predictions or assertions about the long-term effects of NFTs on artists and art markets. Instead, Whitaker and Abrams seek to engage with numerous questions about blockchain technologies—including NFTs and DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations). To address such questions, some definitions are necessary; Whitaker and Abrams cover key concepts and terms early in the book, and they also provide an appendix that walks the reader through the process of minting an NFT. The appendix defines and explains platforms, protocols, wallets, keys, and smart contracts—all concepts that are mentioned earlier in the book, but with which some readers may prefer to spend additional time. The Story of NFTs is not exhaustively entry-level; readers who are already familiar with the basics of NFTs and block-chain technology will still find much to learn, and less familiar readers will get quick, direct definitions that allow them to move on to the more interesting, though less technical, aspects of the topic. The Story of NFTs is predominantly interested in the relationship between NFTs, blockchain technology, and visual arts, and so the technological elements—though important and duly attended to—do not take over the book.

The book's introduction calls attention to two key moments in recent art history—the Association of Art Museum Directors COVID-19-related decision to loosen sales restrictions on museums for two years and the March 2021 sale of Beeple's NFT Everydays: The First 5000 Days for over $69 million. These two events serve to characterize recent disruption within the art world, [End Page 17] but they are not the source of the disruption. Whitaker and Abrams point to these moments to illustrate how NFTs moved to the forefront of art discussions in the past few years, then trace the history from which these moments grew. They set out to "understand NFTs not as an alien landing but instead as part of the history of art." When considered in this light, NFTs appear as a development in the art world rather than an incursion by finance or technology outsiders.

The authors' positioning of NFTs within the larger scope of art history is particularly effective when they connect older art practices and concepts with the capabilities of NFTs. For example, "the Artist's Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement, a 1971 document created by Seth Siegelaub and Robert Projansky and commonly referred to as the Artist's Contract or the Siegelaub-Projansky Agreement," provides artists with resale royalties along with options for control of future exhibitions. Historically, though, most artists have not been able to secure such extensive control over their work. With smart contracts, on the other hand, NFTs can automate resale royalties for artists, and the intellectual property parameters associated with a particular platform or NFT may limit how a purchaser can use the artwork. Furthermore, artists could use DAOs to pool their resources, and "it would be possible to create a retirement investment trust using fractional shares or resale royalties." Such innovations have the potential to "automate processes that were previously too cumbersome bureaucratically." The possibilities certainly sound promising, but it seems we will have to wait and see whether they are effective in practice.

Another particularly interesting example of a connection between NFTs and earlier art practice is the concept of a certificate of authenticity traced back to Sol LeWitt's wall drawings. Rather than prioritizing the paintings themselves, LeWitt's certificates supply instructions for the artwork, and the holder of the certificate is the owner of the artwork. This...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NFT 的故事:艾米-惠特克和诺拉-伯内特-艾布拉姆斯合著的《艺术家、技术与民主》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The Story of NFTs:艾米-惠特克和诺拉-伯内特-艾布拉姆斯著,艺术家、技术和民主 Jessi Rae Morton (bio) The story of NFTs: artists, technology, and democracy 艾米-惠特克和诺拉-伯内特-艾布拉姆斯著,Rizzoli Electa https://www.rizzoliusa.com/book/9780847899364 144 页;印刷版,32.50 美元 在《NFTs 的故事》中,艾米-惠特克和诺拉-伯内特-艾布拉姆斯概述了 NFTs:艺术家、技术和民主:艺术家、技术和民主》一书中,艾米-惠特克和诺拉-伯内特-艾布拉姆斯以深思熟虑、精心设计的方式概述了 NFT(非赝品代币)在艺术界的作用以及 NFT 与艺术史之间的关系。作者经常承认,NFTs是相对较新的事物,因此本书对NFTs对艺术家和艺术市场的长期影响几乎无法做出预测或断言。相反,惠特克和艾布拉姆斯试图探讨有关区块链技术的诸多问题,包括NFT和DAO(去中心化自治组织)。为了解决这些问题,一些定义是必要的;惠特克和艾布拉姆斯在书的开头就介绍了一些关键概念和术语,他们还提供了一个附录,指导读者完成一个NFT的铸造过程。附录对平台、协议、钱包、密钥和智能合约进行了定义和解释--所有这些概念在本书前面都有提到,但有些读者可能更愿意花更多时间来了解它们。NFTs 的故事》并非详尽无遗的入门级读物;已经熟悉 NFTs 和区块链技术基础知识的读者仍然会发现有很多东西需要学习,而不太了解的读者则会得到快速、直接的定义,从而能够继续阅读该主题中更有趣但技术性不强的方面。NFTs 的故事》主要关注的是 NFTs、区块链技术和视觉艺术之间的关系,因此技术元素虽然重要,也得到了应有的关注,但并没有占据全书。该书的导言呼吁人们关注近期艺术史上的两个关键时刻--与美术馆馆长协会(Association of Art Museum Directors COVID-19)有关的决定,即在两年内放宽对美术馆的销售限制,以及2021年3月Beeple的《NFT Everydays》的销售:前 5000 天》以超过 6900 万美元的价格售出。这两个事件是近期艺术界混乱的特征,但它们并不是混乱的根源。惠特克和艾布拉姆斯以这些事件为例,说明了在过去几年中,NFT如何成为艺术讨论的焦点,然后追溯了这些事件的发展历史。他们的目的是 "不是将NFT理解为外来登陆,而是将其理解为艺术史的一部分"。从这个角度来看,NFTs似乎是艺术世界的一种发展,而不是金融或技术外来者的入侵。当作者将旧的艺术实践和概念与 NFT 的能力联系起来时,他们将 NFT 定位在更广阔的艺术史范围内尤为有效。例如,"艺术家保留权利转让和销售协议 "是塞斯-西格劳布和罗伯特-普罗扬斯基于1971年制定的文件,通常被称为 "艺术家合同 "或 "西格劳布-普罗扬斯基协议",该协议为艺术家提供了转售版税以及控制未来展览的选择权。不过,从历史上看,大多数艺术家都无法获得对其作品如此广泛的控制权。另一方面,通过智能合约,NFT 可以自动为艺术家收取转售版税,与特定平台或 NFT 相关的知识产权参数可以限制购买者如何使用艺术品。此外,艺术家还可以利用DAOs来汇集资源,"有可能利用零碎股份或转售版税来创建退休投资信托"。这些创新有可能 "将以前过于繁琐的官僚流程自动化"。这些可能性听起来当然很有希望,但似乎我们还得拭目以待,看看它们在实践中是否有效。另一个特别有趣的例子是,NFT 与早期艺术实践之间的联系可以追溯到索尔-勒维特(Sol LeWitt)的壁画,即鉴定证书的概念。勒威特的证书并不优先考虑绘画本身,而是提供艺术品的说明,证书的持有者就是艺术品的所有者。这...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
It's the Algorithm, Stupid! Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19 by Clare Birchall and Peter Knight (review) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum (review) Conspiracy Theories and Latin American History: Lurking in the Shadows by Luis Roniger and Leonardo Senkman (review) Perennial Conspiracy Theory: Reflections on the History of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by Michael Hagemeister (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1