Development of the forgiveness schema among young children and adolescents: A multinational comparison

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL International Journal of Behavioral Development Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1177/01650254241233531
Germano Vera Cruz, Lonzozou Kpanake, Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales-Martínez, Etienne Mullet
{"title":"Development of the forgiveness schema among young children and adolescents: A multinational comparison","authors":"Germano Vera Cruz, Lonzozou Kpanake, Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales-Martínez, Etienne Mullet","doi":"10.1177/01650254241233531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few studies on the development of forgiveness involved young children and adolescents, and very few involved samples from non-western countries. This study focused on the development of willingness to forgive a particular transgression in participants aged 4 to 12 years and from two different cultures: a South African culture (Mozambique) and a Western European culture (France). Overall, 153 pupils from Mozambique and 107 pupils from France were presented with eight vignettes depicting a situation where a young child, intentionally or accidentally, dropped a small radio that they borrowed from another young child. These vignettes were composed by applying an orthogonal Intent × Consequences × Apologies, 2 × 2 × 2, design. Participants expressed what their willingness to forgive would be in each case on a continuous response scale. Through cluster analysis, four main positions were identified. They were labeled: Almost never forgive (11% of participants), Depends mainly on consequences (22%), Depends mainly on intent and apologies (57%), and Almost always forgive (2%). The first two positions were typical of 4–7-year olds, and the third one was typical of 8–12-year olds. No significant differences in cluster composition were found between the Mozambican and French participants. Up to the age of four, most children probably do not have access to the notion of forgiveness. From the age of four to seven, this notion begins to appear, in particular through a gradual taking into account of circumstantial factors other than the severity of consequences of a transgression. This development is quite rapid—probably during the 7-year period, from 0 to 7 years. From the age of eight onwards, a forgiveness schema similar to that observed in adults is operational. This developmental trajectory is probably very general. It seems to depend little on the type of culture in which it develops.","PeriodicalId":13880,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254241233531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few studies on the development of forgiveness involved young children and adolescents, and very few involved samples from non-western countries. This study focused on the development of willingness to forgive a particular transgression in participants aged 4 to 12 years and from two different cultures: a South African culture (Mozambique) and a Western European culture (France). Overall, 153 pupils from Mozambique and 107 pupils from France were presented with eight vignettes depicting a situation where a young child, intentionally or accidentally, dropped a small radio that they borrowed from another young child. These vignettes were composed by applying an orthogonal Intent × Consequences × Apologies, 2 × 2 × 2, design. Participants expressed what their willingness to forgive would be in each case on a continuous response scale. Through cluster analysis, four main positions were identified. They were labeled: Almost never forgive (11% of participants), Depends mainly on consequences (22%), Depends mainly on intent and apologies (57%), and Almost always forgive (2%). The first two positions were typical of 4–7-year olds, and the third one was typical of 8–12-year olds. No significant differences in cluster composition were found between the Mozambican and French participants. Up to the age of four, most children probably do not have access to the notion of forgiveness. From the age of four to seven, this notion begins to appear, in particular through a gradual taking into account of circumstantial factors other than the severity of consequences of a transgression. This development is quite rapid—probably during the 7-year period, from 0 to 7 years. From the age of eight onwards, a forgiveness schema similar to that observed in adults is operational. This developmental trajectory is probably very general. It seems to depend little on the type of culture in which it develops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿和青少年宽恕模式的发展:多国比较
有关宽恕能力发展的研究很少涉及幼儿和青少年,也很少涉及非西方国家的样本。本研究的重点是对来自两种不同文化背景(南非文化(莫桑比克)和西欧文化(法国)、年龄在 4 至 12 岁之间的参与者原谅特定过失的意愿进行培养。总共有 153 名莫桑比克小学生和 107 名法国小学生参与了 8 个小故事的讨论,故事描述了一个幼儿有意或无意地把从另一个幼儿那里借来的小收音机掉在地上的情景。这些小故事采用了正交的 "意图 × 后果 × 道歉"(2 × 2 × 2)设计。受试者用连续反应量表表达了他们在每种情况下的原谅意愿。通过聚类分析,确定了四个主要立场。它们分别是几乎从不原谅(11% 的参与者)、主要取决于后果(22%)、主要取决于意图和道歉(57%)和几乎总是原谅(2%)。前两种立场是 4-7 岁儿童的典型立场,第三种立场是 8-12 岁儿童的典型立场。莫桑比克和法国的参与者在群组构成上没有发现明显的差异。大多数儿童在四岁之前可能还没有宽恕的概念。从四岁到七岁,这一概念开始出现,特别是通过逐渐考虑过失后果严重程度以外的环境因素。这种发展相当迅速,大概是在 0 到 7 岁的 7 年期间。从 8 岁起,一种与成人相似的宽恕模式开始运作。这种发展轨迹可能非常普遍。它似乎很少取决于其发展的文化类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Development is the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, which exists to promote the discovery, dissemination and application of knowledge about developmental processes at all stages of the life span - infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age. The Journal is already the leading international outlet devoted to reporting interdisciplinary research on behavioural development, and has now, in response to the rapidly developing fields of behavioural genetics, neuroscience and developmental psychopathology, expanded its scope to these and other related new domains of scholarship. In this way, it provides a truly world-wide platform for researchers which can facilitate a greater integrated lifespan perspective. In addition to original empirical research, the Journal also publishes theoretical and review papers, methodological papers, and other work of scientific interest that represents a significant advance in the understanding of any aspect of behavioural development. The Journal also publishes papers on behaviour development research within or across particular geographical regions. Papers are therefore considered from a wide range of disciplines, covering all aspects of the lifespan. Articles on topics of eminent current interest, such as research on the later life phases, biological processes in behaviour development, cross-national, and cross-cultural issues, and interdisciplinary research in general, are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Social support moderates the link between chronic peer victimization in school and later cortisol secretion Are narrative story stem methods valid in “non-Western” contexts? A systematic review Psychometric evaluation of a brief measure to capture general population-level variation in ADHD symptoms from childhood through the transition to adulthood A longitudinal study of parents’ home-safety practices to prevent injuries during infancy The current practice of latent growth curve modeling in the social and behavioral sciences: Observations and recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1