Culture as response

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethos Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1111/etho.12427
Michael Schnegg
{"title":"Culture as response","authors":"Michael Schnegg","doi":"10.1111/etho.12427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To explain cultural diversity, many theories refer to the social construction of reality. In this telling, we frame the world to make it meaningful. In my analysis of what people in Namibia and Germany know about “SARS-Cov-2” and “climate change,” I propose an anti-constructivist alternative. Drawing on the work of the phenomenologist Bernhard Waldenfels, I argue that experience comes first and exceeds language and the conceptual and symbolic orders we use to describe it. Waldenfels refers to this excess as “the alien” (<i>das Fremde</i>). This alienness calls us and demands a response. Only by responding, do we make the world meaningful. Since the alien is the excess to a particular order it becomes important to explore how orders are applied in situations. To explain this, I draw on recent developments in “4E” cognition that describe the mind-world relation as fourfold intertwined: <i>embedded, embodied, extended</i>, and <i>enacted</i>. Combining Waldenfels’ responsive phenomenology and “4E” cognition thus allows it to be shown how knowledge emerges as an <i>enactive response</i> to the demands situations create. I conclude by showing how this opens up new possibilities for addressing the plurality and situatedness of knowledge in anthropology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51532,"journal":{"name":"Ethos","volume":"52 2","pages":"308-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12427","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explain cultural diversity, many theories refer to the social construction of reality. In this telling, we frame the world to make it meaningful. In my analysis of what people in Namibia and Germany know about “SARS-Cov-2” and “climate change,” I propose an anti-constructivist alternative. Drawing on the work of the phenomenologist Bernhard Waldenfels, I argue that experience comes first and exceeds language and the conceptual and symbolic orders we use to describe it. Waldenfels refers to this excess as “the alien” (das Fremde). This alienness calls us and demands a response. Only by responding, do we make the world meaningful. Since the alien is the excess to a particular order it becomes important to explore how orders are applied in situations. To explain this, I draw on recent developments in “4E” cognition that describe the mind-world relation as fourfold intertwined: embedded, embodied, extended, and enacted. Combining Waldenfels’ responsive phenomenology and “4E” cognition thus allows it to be shown how knowledge emerges as an enactive response to the demands situations create. I conclude by showing how this opens up new possibilities for addressing the plurality and situatedness of knowledge in anthropology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为回应的文化
为了解释文化多样性,许多理论都提到了现实的社会建构。在这种说法中,我们框定了世界,使其变得有意义。在分析纳米比亚和德国人对 "SARS-Cov-2 "和 "气候变化 "的认识时,我提出了一种反建构主义的替代方案。借鉴现象学家伯恩哈德-瓦尔登费尔斯(Bernhard Waldenfels)的研究成果,我认为经验是第一位的,它超越了语言以及我们用来描述它的概念和符号秩序。瓦尔登费尔斯将这种超越称为 "异己"(das Fremde)。这种异化召唤着我们,要求我们做出回应。只有通过回应,我们才能使世界变得有意义。既然 "异己 "是对特定秩序的超越,那么探索秩序如何在情境中应用就变得非常重要。为了解释这一点,我借鉴了 "4E "认知的最新发展,这种认知将心灵与世界的关系描述为四重相互交织的关系:嵌入、体现、扩展和颁布。因此,将瓦尔登费尔斯的反应现象学与 "4E "认知相结合,就能说明知识是如何作为对情境需求的积极反应而出现的。最后,我将说明这如何为人类学解决知识的多元性和情景性问题提供了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethos
Ethos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethos is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly journal devoted to scholarly articles dealing with the interrelationships between the individual and the sociocultural milieu, between the psychological disciplines and the social disciplines. The journal publishes work from a wide spectrum of research perspectives. Recent issues, for example, include papers on religion and ritual, medical practice, child development, family relationships, interactional dynamics, history and subjectivity, feminist approaches, emotion, cognitive modeling and cultural belief systems. Methodologies range from analyses of language and discourse, to ethnographic and historical interpretations, to experimental treatments and cross-cultural comparisons.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Gaming lounges in India afford socially productive gambling: The moral economy and foundations of play in Udaipur, Rajasthan Disclosure imperatives and women's subjectivities in an emergent culture of sexual trauma testimony Learning to walk in the forest Embodying the nuclear: The moral struggle of family care in postfallout Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1