Effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: A randomised double-blind comparative trial.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_852_23
Xiaoqian Yang, Hui Yang, Mengci Li, Kairun Zhu, Lulu Shen, Chenglan Xie
{"title":"Effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: A randomised double-blind comparative trial.","authors":"Xiaoqian Yang, Hui Yang, Mengci Li, Kairun Zhu, Lulu Shen, Chenglan Xie","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_852_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Recent studies have found that ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) and intravenous infusion of lidocaine (IVL) have the potential to improve the quality of postoperative recovery. This study aimed to investigate and compare their effects on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 135 patients were randomised to Group N: BSCPB with 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine on each side, Group L: intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg for 10 min, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h) and Group C: intravenous saline combined with BSCPB saline. The primary objective was quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40). Other parameters compared were numeric rating pain scale (NRS) score, haemodynamic data, opioid dosage and incidence of adverse effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Group C, both groups N and L had higher QoR-40 total scores as well as scores indicating physical comfort, emotional state and pain dimensions on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The QoR-40 total and pain dimension scores in Group N were higher on POD1 and POD2 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The NRS scores and the change in haemodynamics were lower in Group N compared to groups L and C (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The results of other parameters were lower in groups N and L than in Group C (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USG BSCPB and IVL are comparable in improving the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 3","pages":"238-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_852_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Recent studies have found that ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) and intravenous infusion of lidocaine (IVL) have the potential to improve the quality of postoperative recovery. This study aimed to investigate and compare their effects on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Methods: A total of 135 patients were randomised to Group N: BSCPB with 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine on each side, Group L: intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg for 10 min, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h) and Group C: intravenous saline combined with BSCPB saline. The primary objective was quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40). Other parameters compared were numeric rating pain scale (NRS) score, haemodynamic data, opioid dosage and incidence of adverse effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Chi-square test.

Results: Compared to Group C, both groups N and L had higher QoR-40 total scores as well as scores indicating physical comfort, emotional state and pain dimensions on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2 (P < 0.001). The QoR-40 total and pain dimension scores in Group N were higher on POD1 and POD2 (P < 0.05). The NRS scores and the change in haemodynamics were lower in Group N compared to groups L and C (P < 0.05). The results of other parameters were lower in groups N and L than in Group C (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: USG BSCPB and IVL are comparable in improving the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下双侧颈浅神经丛阻滞与围手术期静脉注射利多卡因对甲状腺切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响:随机双盲对比试验。
背景和目的:最近的研究发现,超声引导下(USG)双侧颈浅神经丛阻滞(BSCPB)和静脉输注利多卡因(IVL)有可能改善术后恢复质量。本研究旨在调查和比较这两种方法对甲状腺切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响:共有 135 名患者被随机分为 N 组:BSCPB,每侧 10 mL 0.75% 罗哌卡因;L 组:静脉注射利多卡因(1.5 mg/kg 10 分钟,然后 1.5 mg/kg/h);C 组:静脉注射生理盐水和 BSCPB 生理盐水。主要目标是恢复质量-40(QoR-40)。其他比较参数包括疼痛评分量表(NRS)评分、血液动力学数据、阿片类药物用量和不良反应发生率。统计分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和卡方检验:与 C 组相比,N 组和 L 组在术后第 1 天(POD)和第 2 天(P<0.001)的 QoR-40 总分以及身体舒适度、情绪状态和疼痛维度的评分均较高(P<0.001)。N 组在术后第 1 天和第 2 天的 QoR-40 总分和疼痛维度得分更高(P < 0.05)。与 L 组和 C 组相比,N 组的 NRS 评分和血液动力学变化较低(P < 0.05)。N 组和 L 组的其他参数结果低于 C 组(P < 0.05):结论:USG BSCPB 和 IVL 在改善甲状腺切除术患者术后恢复质量方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
ERAS- Challenges and Opportunities: IJA Infographics. Evaluating the predictive efficacy of the El-Ganzouri risk index for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation with King Vision video laryngoscope: A prospective cohort study. Challenges and opportunities in enhanced recovery after surgery programs: An overview. Comparison of Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) monitors with CONOX® monitor regarding sevoflurane consumption during routine general anaesthesia: A randomised clinical trial. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1