[Laparoscopic excision versus open excision for the treatment of choledochal cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Q4 Medicine Khirurgiya Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17116/hirurgia202403154
G Plasencia, J C Alvarado, C Z Corvera, W P Angulo
{"title":"[Laparoscopic excision versus open excision for the treatment of choledochal cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis].","authors":"G Plasencia, J C Alvarado, C Z Corvera, W P Angulo","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202403154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in 3 databases measuring the efficacy of laparoscopic and open excision of choledochal cysts was performed. The authors considered international and national reports, whose results were analyzed in detail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean duration of laparoscopic excision was 51 min, open excision - 35.4 min. Length of hospital-stay after laparoscopic excision ranged between 5 and 74 days, after open excision - between 7 and 146 days. Bile leakage rate was 1-2% and 4%, respectively. Laparoscopic excision was followed by lower complication rate. Morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic excision was 20% and 0%, in open excision - 60% and 3.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 3","pages":"54-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202403154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.

Material and methods: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in 3 databases measuring the efficacy of laparoscopic and open excision of choledochal cysts was performed. The authors considered international and national reports, whose results were analyzed in detail.

Results: Mean duration of laparoscopic excision was 51 min, open excision - 35.4 min. Length of hospital-stay after laparoscopic excision ranged between 5 and 74 days, after open excision - between 7 and 146 days. Bile leakage rate was 1-2% and 4%, respectively. Laparoscopic excision was followed by lower complication rate. Morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic excision was 20% and 0%, in open excision - 60% and 3.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[腹腔镜切除术与开腹切除术治疗胆总管囊肿的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析]。
目的:确定腹腔镜切除术在治疗胆总管囊肿方面是否比开腹切除术更有效:确定在治疗胆总管囊肿时,腹腔镜切除术是否比开腹切除术更有效:对 3 个数据库中关于胆总管囊肿腹腔镜切除术和开腹切除术疗效的随机临床试验进行了系统回顾。作者考虑了国际和国内报告,并对其结果进行了详细分析:腹腔镜切除术的平均时间为 51 分钟,开腹切除术为 35.4 分钟。腹腔镜切除术后的住院时间为 5 至 74 天,开腹切除术后的住院时间为 7 至 146 天。胆汁渗漏率分别为1-2%和4%。腹腔镜切除术的并发症发生率较低。腹腔镜切除术的发病率和死亡率分别为20%和0%,而开腹切除术的发病率和死亡率分别为60%和3.3%:结论:在治疗胆总管囊肿方面,腹腔镜切除术比开腹切除术更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
期刊最新文献
[Endoscopic stenting for malignant pancreatobiliary strictures]. [Ankle replacement for severe post-traumatic deformation of the distal tibia: a case report]. [Comparative analysis of in-hospital and long-term results of patients with acute dysfunction of coronary bypass grafts depending on treatment tactics]. [Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of patients with pathological tortuosity of the internal carotid artery]. [Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1