Severe skin and soft tissue infection in cohort patients admitted in a teaching hospital in Belgium: identification of risk factors for surgery.

Infectious diseases (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2327518
J C Yombi, A Munting, A Lentini, D Putineanu, D Castanares-Zapatero, H Yildiz
{"title":"Severe skin and soft tissue infection in cohort patients admitted in a teaching hospital in Belgium: identification of risk factors for surgery.","authors":"J C Yombi, A Munting, A Lentini, D Putineanu, D Castanares-Zapatero, H Yildiz","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2327518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are associated with significant mortality if not promptly diagnosed and surgically treated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare patients with severe skin and soft tissue infection treated with or without a surgical intervention and to identify risk factors that can predict the need for early surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, clinical, laboratory, Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and imaging results were retrospectively collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 91 non-NSTI (group 1), 26 NSTI who were operated (group 2) and eight suspected NSTI who were not operated (group 3). In the multivariate analysis, skin necrosis, tachycardia, CRP value and hyperglycemia were predictive for surgery. A performance analysis revealed AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.78) as to the LRINEC score for the use of surgery. The AUC for a predictive model associating four variables (heart rate, skin necrosis, CRP and glycemia at admission) was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59-0.84). In terms of outcome, the median length of stay (LOS) was statistically higher in group 2 vs. group 1 (seven days (5-15) vs. 34 days (20-42), <i>p</i> < .001) and in group 2 vs. group 3 (34 days (20-42) vs. 14 days (11-19), <i>p</i> = .005). The overall in-hospital mortality at 30 days was 3.2% and did not statistically differ between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the LRINEC score performed well in predicting surgery, the AUC of a model combining four predictive variables (glycemia, skin necrosis, CRP and heart rate) was superior. Further research is needed to validate this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"511-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2327518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are associated with significant mortality if not promptly diagnosed and surgically treated.

Aim: This study aims to compare patients with severe skin and soft tissue infection treated with or without a surgical intervention and to identify risk factors that can predict the need for early surgery.

Methods: Demographics, clinical, laboratory, Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and imaging results were retrospectively collected.

Results: There were 91 non-NSTI (group 1), 26 NSTI who were operated (group 2) and eight suspected NSTI who were not operated (group 3). In the multivariate analysis, skin necrosis, tachycardia, CRP value and hyperglycemia were predictive for surgery. A performance analysis revealed AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.78) as to the LRINEC score for the use of surgery. The AUC for a predictive model associating four variables (heart rate, skin necrosis, CRP and glycemia at admission) was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59-0.84). In terms of outcome, the median length of stay (LOS) was statistically higher in group 2 vs. group 1 (seven days (5-15) vs. 34 days (20-42), p < .001) and in group 2 vs. group 3 (34 days (20-42) vs. 14 days (11-19), p = .005). The overall in-hospital mortality at 30 days was 3.2% and did not statistically differ between the three groups.

Conclusions: Although the LRINEC score performed well in predicting surgery, the AUC of a model combining four predictive variables (glycemia, skin necrosis, CRP and heart rate) was superior. Further research is needed to validate this model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时一家教学医院收治的同组患者中的严重皮肤和软组织感染:确定手术风险因素。
背景:坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)如果得不到及时诊断和手术治疗,死亡率会很高。目的:本研究旨在比较严重皮肤和软组织感染患者接受或不接受手术治疗的情况,并找出可预测是否需要早期手术的风险因素:方法:回顾性收集人口统计学、临床、实验室、坏死性筋膜炎风险指标(LRINEC)和影像学结果:91例非坏死性筋膜炎患者(第1组),26例坏死性筋膜炎患者接受了手术(第2组),8例疑似坏死性筋膜炎患者未接受手术(第3组)。在多变量分析中,皮肤坏死、心动过速、CRP 值和高血糖对手术具有预测作用。性能分析显示,LRINEC 评分对手术使用的 AUC 为 0.65(95%CI:0.52-0.78)。与四个变量(入院时的心率、皮肤坏死、CRP和血糖)相关联的预测模型的AUC为0.71(95%CI:0.59-0.84)。就结果而言,第 2 组与第 1 组相比,中位住院时间(LOS)在统计学上更高(7 天(5-15)对 34 天(20-42),P = .005)。30 天的总体院内死亡率为 3.2%,三组之间无统计学差异:结论:尽管 LRINEC 评分在预测手术方面表现良好,但结合四个预测变量(血糖、皮肤坏死、CRP 和心率)的模型的 AUC 更优。需要进一步研究验证该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting persistent SARS-CoV-2 shedding in immunocompromised patients: a probability-based approach. National trends in pneumonia-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2019. Prevalence and risk factors for haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection during Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. HPV-16 E6 mutation and viral integration related host DNA methylation implicate the development and progression of cervical cancer. Interferon gene expression declines over time post-COVID infection and in long COVID patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1