Home-based exercise program for people with residual disability following hospitalization for COVID-19: Randomized control trial

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101815
Mara Paneroni , Simonetta Scalvini , Elisa Perger , Elisabetta Zampogna , Simone Govetto , Federico Mattia Oliva , Ambra Matrone , Palmira Bernocchi , Debora Rosa , Michele Vitacca
{"title":"Home-based exercise program for people with residual disability following hospitalization for COVID-19: Randomized control trial","authors":"Mara Paneroni ,&nbsp;Simonetta Scalvini ,&nbsp;Elisa Perger ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Zampogna ,&nbsp;Simone Govetto ,&nbsp;Federico Mattia Oliva ,&nbsp;Ambra Matrone ,&nbsp;Palmira Bernocchi ,&nbsp;Debora Rosa ,&nbsp;Michele Vitacca","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk &lt;70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (<em>n</em> = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (<em>p</em> = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results &lt; lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (<em>p</em> = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (<em>p</em> = 0.807).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Database registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 101815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown.

Objective

We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse.

Methods

This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk <70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises).

Results

We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (n = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results < lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807).

Conclusions

In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline.

Database registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对因 COVID-19 住院治疗后残留残疾者的家庭锻炼计划:随机对照试验
背景对于 COVID-19 治疗后在休息和/或运动时出现费力不耐受或缺氧的患者,如果他们已经接受了院内康复治疗,那么他们的最佳运动计划是什么仍不得而知。方法这是一项多中心随机对照试验,针对的是已确诊并接受 COVID-19 治疗的患者。尽管接受了住院康复治疗,但他们仍有耐力不足的问题;耐力不足的定义是:a)在六分钟步行测试(6MWT)中只能走完预测距离的 70%,和/或 b)全天/在耐力不足时出现血氧饱和度下降。6MWT 评估的主要结果是努力耐受性。次要结果是呼吸困难、疲劳、肺活量、呼吸肌评估和氧饱和度。干预组进行为期 4 周的自我指导锻炼计划,每两周与理疗师进行一次视频通话;对照组则按照自己的意愿参加体育锻炼。运动强度根据残疾程度和血氧饱和度分为 4 个等级。运动强度从低强度(步行、自由体操、坐立和平衡练习)逐渐增加到高强度(使用计步器速走、自行车测力计和强化练习):干预组 40 人,对照组 39 人。平均(标清)年龄为 67.1 (10.3)岁;72%(n = 57)为男性。在努力耐受力方面没有发现组间差异[干预组 77.6 (75.4)m vs 对照组 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]。6MWT距离结果为正常值下限的参与者在平均(标清)努力耐受性方面表现出最佳改善:干预组,120.1 (75.8)m vs 对照组,59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035)。2个月后,两组的平均(标清)6MWT距离相似:干预组,475.9 (82.4)m vs 对照组,469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807)。结论在COVID-19后和住院康复后有残余残疾的人中,带有远程咨询的家庭锻炼计划能显著改善用力耐受性,但仅限于基线时有严重用力不耐受的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review. “From pain to neglect behavior of peripheral origin” Diffusion tensor imaging reveals Papez circuit lesions in severe traumatic brain injury with memory disorder. Simulated breathing in virtual reality does not affect perceived effort during the physical rehabilitation of people with long COVID Intensive interdisciplinary specialized rehabilitation or regular physiotherapy for multiple sclerosis? A randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1