Application of Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Uncertain MCDM Methodology for Ph.D Supervisor Selection Problem

Shubhendu Mandal , Kamal Hossain Gazi , Soheil Salahshour , Sankar Prasad Mondal , Paritosh Bhattacharya , Apu Kumar Saha
{"title":"Application of Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Uncertain MCDM Methodology for Ph.D Supervisor Selection Problem","authors":"Shubhendu Mandal ,&nbsp;Kamal Hossain Gazi ,&nbsp;Soheil Salahshour ,&nbsp;Sankar Prasad Mondal ,&nbsp;Paritosh Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Apu Kumar Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2024.100411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The selection of Ph.D (Doctor of Philosophy) supervisor is always a vital and interesting problem in academia and especially for students who want to carry out Ph.D. Nowadays, selecting a supervisor for Ph.D in a scientific manner becomes a challenge for any student because of the variety of options available to the scholar. In this context, the present study aims to formulate a model for Ph.D. supervisor selection from the offered alternatives in an academic institute. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework has been applied to select the suitable supervisor of the student’s preferred criteria under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) scenario. The IVIF Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been employed to prioritize the criteria, whereas IVIF Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) technique is engaged to rank the available supervisors based on criteria weight. A set of eight criteria and five alternatives have been considered for modeling the problem. Moreover, the potential criteria are weighted and ranked by the multiple decision makers in the present study. To examine the consistency and robustness of the proposed integrated approach, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis have been carried out. From all the analyses, it can be conferred that the suggested approach is quite useful to apply in different decision-making scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000419/pdfft?md5=3defa7a14e503f1dee51b0a46d9709f1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666720724000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of Ph.D (Doctor of Philosophy) supervisor is always a vital and interesting problem in academia and especially for students who want to carry out Ph.D. Nowadays, selecting a supervisor for Ph.D in a scientific manner becomes a challenge for any student because of the variety of options available to the scholar. In this context, the present study aims to formulate a model for Ph.D. supervisor selection from the offered alternatives in an academic institute. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework has been applied to select the suitable supervisor of the student’s preferred criteria under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) scenario. The IVIF Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been employed to prioritize the criteria, whereas IVIF Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) technique is engaged to rank the available supervisors based on criteria weight. A set of eight criteria and five alternatives have been considered for modeling the problem. Moreover, the potential criteria are weighted and ranked by the multiple decision makers in the present study. To examine the consistency and robustness of the proposed integrated approach, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis have been carried out. From all the analyses, it can be conferred that the suggested approach is quite useful to apply in different decision-making scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在博士生导师遴选问题中应用区间值直觉模糊不确定多因素强迫管理方法
在学术界,尤其是对于想要攻读博士学位的学生来说,选择博士生导师始终是一个重要而有趣的问题。如今,由于可供学者选择的导师种类繁多,以科学的方式选择博士生导师对任何学生来说都是一个挑战。在这种情况下,本研究旨在为学术机构从提供的备选方案中选择博士生导师制定一个模型。在区间值直观模糊(IVIF)的情况下,混合多标准决策(MCDM)框架被用于根据学生的首选标准选择合适的导师。采用 IVIF 层次分析法(AHP)对标准进行优先排序,同时采用 IVIF 理想解相似度排序技术(TOPSIS)根据标准权重对可用的主管进行排序。在建立问题模型时,考虑了八项标准和五个备选方案。此外,在本研究中,多个决策者对潜在标准进行了加权和排序。为了检验拟议综合方法的一致性和稳健性,还进行了敏感性分析和比较分析。从所有分析中可以得出,建议的方法在不同的决策场景中都非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
期刊最新文献
Optimal control analysis of a mathematical model for guava nutrients in an integrated farming with cost-effectiveness Observer-based fuzzy T–S control with an estimation error guarantee for MPPT of a photovoltaic battery charger in partial shade conditions Satellite imagery, big data, IoT and deep learning techniques for wheat yield prediction in Morocco Selective opposition based constrained barnacle mating optimization: Theory and applications Comparative exploration on EEG signal filtering using window control methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1