Effects of stress management interventions on heart rate variability in adults with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s10865-024-00468-4
Emily C. Gathright, Joel W. Hughes, Shufang Sun, Laurie E. Storlazzi, Julie DeCosta, Brittany L. Balletto, Michael P. Carey, Lori A. J. Scott-Sheldon, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher
{"title":"Effects of stress management interventions on heart rate variability in adults with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Emily C. Gathright, Joel W. Hughes, Shufang Sun, Laurie E. Storlazzi, Julie DeCosta, Brittany L. Balletto, Michael P. Carey, Lori A. J. Scott-Sheldon, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00468-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Meta-analysis was used to investigate the potential benefits of stress management interventions (SMIs) on vagally-mediated heart rate variability (HRV) in adults with cardiovascular disease. Electronic bibliographic databases were searched through August 2022. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing effects of SMIs on HRV were included. Methodological quality was assessed with a standardized checklist. A pooled effect size was calculated for vagally-mediated HRV indices (standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, root mean square of the successive differences, and high frequency power) using random effects models. Fourteen studies (1202 participants, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub>: 59 ± 6.25 years; 25% ± 16% women; 61% ± 22% White) were included. Ten studies (11 effects) reported short-term HRV assessment; a small between-group difference emerged for vagally-mediated HRV (<i>d</i>+ = .27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.52, <i>k</i> = 11). Most interventions examined biofeedback; these studies yielded a small between-group difference on vagally-mediated HRV (<i>d</i>+ = 0.31, 95% CI 0.09–0.53, <i>k</i> = 7, <i>Q</i> [6] = 3.82, <i>p</i> = .70, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 11%). This is the first systematic examination of the effect of SMIs on HRV in adults with CVD. Findings suggest a small effect of SMIs on vagally-mediated HRV, with biofeedback likely driving the effect. More research is required to fully understand whether this benefit on vagally-mediated HRV applies to other SMIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00468-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meta-analysis was used to investigate the potential benefits of stress management interventions (SMIs) on vagally-mediated heart rate variability (HRV) in adults with cardiovascular disease. Electronic bibliographic databases were searched through August 2022. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing effects of SMIs on HRV were included. Methodological quality was assessed with a standardized checklist. A pooled effect size was calculated for vagally-mediated HRV indices (standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, root mean square of the successive differences, and high frequency power) using random effects models. Fourteen studies (1202 participants, Mage: 59 ± 6.25 years; 25% ± 16% women; 61% ± 22% White) were included. Ten studies (11 effects) reported short-term HRV assessment; a small between-group difference emerged for vagally-mediated HRV (d+ = .27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.52, k = 11). Most interventions examined biofeedback; these studies yielded a small between-group difference on vagally-mediated HRV (d+ = 0.31, 95% CI 0.09–0.53, k = 7, Q [6] = 3.82, p = .70, I2 = 11%). This is the first systematic examination of the effect of SMIs on HRV in adults with CVD. Findings suggest a small effect of SMIs on vagally-mediated HRV, with biofeedback likely driving the effect. More research is required to fully understand whether this benefit on vagally-mediated HRV applies to other SMIs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力管理干预对成人心血管疾病患者心率变异性的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本研究采用 Meta 分析法研究压力管理干预(SMI)对患有心血管疾病的成人迷走神经介导的心率变异性(HRV)的潜在益处。电子文献数据库的检索截止到 2022 年 8 月。纳入了评估 SMI 对心率变异性影响的随机对照试验和准实验研究。研究方法的质量采用标准化检查表进行评估。使用随机效应模型计算了由迷走神经介导的心率变异指数(正常至正常间期的标准偏差、连续差值的均方根和高频功率)的汇总效应大小。共纳入 14 项研究(1202 名参与者,年龄:59 ± 6.25 岁;25% ± 16%为女性;61% ± 22%为白人)。十项研究(11 项效应)报告了短期心率变异评估;迷走神经介导的心率变异出现了较小的组间差异(d+ = 0.27,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.01-0.52,k = 11)。大多数干预措施都检查了生物反馈;这些研究在迷走神经介导的心率变异方面产生了较小的组间差异(d+ = 0.31,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.09-0.53,k = 7,Q [6] = 3.82,p = .70,I2 = 11%)。这是首次系统性研究 SMI 对心血管疾病成人患者心率变异的影响。研究结果表明,SMI 对迷走神经介导的心率变异的影响较小,生物反馈可能是产生这种影响的原因。要充分了解这种对迷走神经介导的心率变异的益处是否适用于其他 SMIs,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Predicting antiretroviral medication adherence among substance-using people with HIV: test and extension of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. The impact of experiential avoidance on anxiety and depressive disorders in hematological cancer patients. The mediating role of social support in behavioral changes and weight loss outcomes among overweight Appalachian adults. Cyclic sighing in the clinic waiting room may decrease pain: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Anxiety moderates the association between severity of food insecurity and sleep duration among young adults in food-insecure households.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1