Predictors of mortality one year after pelvic fractures in an older population: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01373-8
Sofie Desmet, Sigrid Janssens, Michiel Herteleer, Nathalie Noppe, Michaël R Laurent, Evelien Gielen, Marian Dejaeger
{"title":"Predictors of mortality one year after pelvic fractures in an older population: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sofie Desmet, Sigrid Janssens, Michiel Herteleer, Nathalie Noppe, Michaël R Laurent, Evelien Gielen, Marian Dejaeger","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01373-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal was to investigate if patient characteristics can be used to predict 1-year post-fracture mortality after pelvic fracture. Multivariate logistic regression identified male gender, comorbidities and presence of in-hospital complications as predictors of 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Osteoporotic pelvic fractures have significant mortality and morbidity in the older population. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors predicting one-year mortality of patients sustaining a low-impact pelvic fracture (pelvic ring and acetabulum).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 282 patients aged ≥ 65 years presenting with a low-energy pelvic ring (n =254) or acetabular (n =28) fracture to the emergency department at the University Hospitals Leuven were included. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected and predictors for mortality one year after pelvic ring fractures were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-year mortality after osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures and acetabular fractures was respectively 20.4% (95% CI 15.7-26.0) and 14% (95% CI 4.0-32.7). Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for confounders identified male gender (OR 3.18; 95% CI (1.06-9.49), p =0.038), a higher number of comorbidities (OR 1.5; 95% CI (1.16-1.95), p =0.002) and in-hospital complications (OR 5.00; 95% CI (1.39-17.97), p =0.014) as independent predictors of one-year mortality after pelvic ring fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The one-year mortality after low-energy pelvic is high and can be predicted by different patient characteristics. These findings can guide pelvis fracture treatment decisions in the older population.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01373-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal was to investigate if patient characteristics can be used to predict 1-year post-fracture mortality after pelvic fracture. Multivariate logistic regression identified male gender, comorbidities and presence of in-hospital complications as predictors of 1-year mortality.

Purpose: Osteoporotic pelvic fractures have significant mortality and morbidity in the older population. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors predicting one-year mortality of patients sustaining a low-impact pelvic fracture (pelvic ring and acetabulum).

Methods: A total of 282 patients aged ≥ 65 years presenting with a low-energy pelvic ring (n =254) or acetabular (n =28) fracture to the emergency department at the University Hospitals Leuven were included. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected and predictors for mortality one year after pelvic ring fractures were evaluated.

Results: The one-year mortality after osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures and acetabular fractures was respectively 20.4% (95% CI 15.7-26.0) and 14% (95% CI 4.0-32.7). Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for confounders identified male gender (OR 3.18; 95% CI (1.06-9.49), p =0.038), a higher number of comorbidities (OR 1.5; 95% CI (1.16-1.95), p =0.002) and in-hospital complications (OR 5.00; 95% CI (1.39-17.97), p =0.014) as independent predictors of one-year mortality after pelvic ring fractures.

Conclusion: The one-year mortality after low-energy pelvic is high and can be predicted by different patient characteristics. These findings can guide pelvis fracture treatment decisions in the older population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人骨盆骨折一年后的死亡率预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:骨盆骨质疏松性骨折具有显著的死亡率和发病率。多变量逻辑回归确定男性性别、合并症和是否存在院内并发症是预测1年死亡率的因素。目的:骨质疏松性骨盆骨折在老年人群中具有显著的死亡率和发病率。本研究旨在调查预测低冲击骨盆骨折(骨盆环和髋臼)患者一年死亡率的因素:研究共纳入了282名年龄≥65岁、在鲁汶大学医院急诊科就诊的低能量骨盆环(n =254)或髋臼(n =28)骨折患者。研究人员回顾性地收集了人口统计学和临床数据,并评估了骨盆环骨折一年后的死亡率预测因素:结果:骨质疏松性骨盆环骨折和髋臼骨折后一年的死亡率分别为 20.4% (95% CI 15.7-26.0) 和 14% (95% CI 4.0-32.7)。根据混杂因素调整后的多变量逻辑回归发现,男性(OR 3.18;95% CI (1.06-9.49),p =0.038)、合并症较多(OR 1.5;95% CI (1.16-1.95),p =0.002)和院内并发症(OR 5.00;95% CI (1.39-17.97),p =0.014)是骨盆环骨折后一年死亡率的独立预测因素:结论:低能量骨盆术后一年死亡率较高,不同的患者特征可预测其一年死亡率。这些发现可为老年人骨盆骨折治疗决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops. Cold shock treatment alleviates pitting in sweet cherry fruit by enhancing antioxidant enzymes activity and regulating membrane lipid metabolism. Removal of proteins and lipids affects structure, in vitro digestion and physicochemical properties of rice flour modified by heat-moisture treatment. Investigating the impact of climate variables on the organic honey yield in Turkey using XGBoost machine learning. Evaluation of the potential of achachairu peel (Garcinia humilis) for the fortification of cereal-based foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1