Nayereh Abdali, Mohammad Nadipour Borujeni, Sayedeh Azimeh Hosseini, Rahim Malekzadeh, Marzieh Abolhasani, Seyed Abbas Mirzaei, Fatemeh Elahian
{"title":"Paynantheine more effectively reverses multidrug resistance in malignant EPG85.257RDB and MCF7MX cells than morphine and speciociliatine","authors":"Nayereh Abdali, Mohammad Nadipour Borujeni, Sayedeh Azimeh Hosseini, Rahim Malekzadeh, Marzieh Abolhasani, Seyed Abbas Mirzaei, Fatemeh Elahian","doi":"10.1002/cbin.12152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The possible interactions of morphine, paynantheine and speciociliatine alkaloids with ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters was investigated. The compounds were docked against ABCG2 and ABCB1 to predict the binding mode of alkaloids in active binding sites. The cytotoxicity of morphine, paynantheine and speciociliatine for EPG85.257RDB and MCF7MX cells was determined and ABCB1 and ABCG2 gene and protein expression were determined. The binding score of paynantheine to ABCB1 was higher in the docking studies. Paynantheine and speciociliatine had similar binding scores to ABCB1, but higher binding scores to ABCG2 than did morphine. Paynantheine and speciociliatine were more effective against MCF7MX and EPG85.257RDB cells and showed greater cyctotoxicity in the MTT assay. The effect of morphine and paynantheine on the ABCB1 gene and protein expression suggests these compounds can reduce resistance in cancer patients, but that speciociliatine may not be a suitable candidate because of its increased ABCB1 expression while speciociliatine decreased the expression of ABCG2 in MCF7MX cells. This indicates that speciociliatine is a better candidate for reducing drug resistance in this cell line. Structural modification, drug-metabolizing enzymes and differences in the binding sites could cause functional differences between these compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":9806,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biology International","volume":"48 6","pages":"861-871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biology International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbin.12152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The possible interactions of morphine, paynantheine and speciociliatine alkaloids with ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters was investigated. The compounds were docked against ABCG2 and ABCB1 to predict the binding mode of alkaloids in active binding sites. The cytotoxicity of morphine, paynantheine and speciociliatine for EPG85.257RDB and MCF7MX cells was determined and ABCB1 and ABCG2 gene and protein expression were determined. The binding score of paynantheine to ABCB1 was higher in the docking studies. Paynantheine and speciociliatine had similar binding scores to ABCB1, but higher binding scores to ABCG2 than did morphine. Paynantheine and speciociliatine were more effective against MCF7MX and EPG85.257RDB cells and showed greater cyctotoxicity in the MTT assay. The effect of morphine and paynantheine on the ABCB1 gene and protein expression suggests these compounds can reduce resistance in cancer patients, but that speciociliatine may not be a suitable candidate because of its increased ABCB1 expression while speciociliatine decreased the expression of ABCG2 in MCF7MX cells. This indicates that speciociliatine is a better candidate for reducing drug resistance in this cell line. Structural modification, drug-metabolizing enzymes and differences in the binding sites could cause functional differences between these compounds.
期刊介绍:
Each month, the journal publishes easy-to-assimilate, up-to-the minute reports of experimental findings by researchers using a wide range of the latest techniques. Promoting the aims of cell biologists worldwide, papers reporting on structure and function - especially where they relate to the physiology of the whole cell - are strongly encouraged. Molecular biology is welcome, as long as articles report findings that are seen in the wider context of cell biology. In covering all areas of the cell, the journal is both appealing and accessible to a broad audience. Authors whose papers do not appeal to cell biologists in general because their topic is too specialized (e.g. infectious microbes, protozoology) are recommended to send them to more relevant journals. Papers reporting whole animal studies or work more suited to a medical journal, e.g. histopathological studies or clinical immunology, are unlikely to be accepted, unless they are fully focused on some important cellular aspect.
These last remarks extend particularly to papers on cancer. Unless firmly based on some deeper cellular or molecular biological principle, papers that are highly specialized in this field, with limited appeal to cell biologists at large, should be directed towards journals devoted to cancer, there being very many from which to choose.