Efficacy of an Intensive Exposure Intervention for Individuals With Persistent Concussion Symptoms Following Concussion: A Concurrent Multiple Baseline Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000942
Skye King, Sven Z Stapert, Ieke Winkens, Joukje van der Naalt, Caroline M van Heugten, Marleen M Rijkeboer
{"title":"Efficacy of an Intensive Exposure Intervention for Individuals With Persistent Concussion Symptoms Following Concussion: A Concurrent Multiple Baseline Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Study.","authors":"Skye King, Sven Z Stapert, Ieke Winkens, Joukje van der Naalt, Caroline M van Heugten, Marleen M Rijkeboer","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After a concussion, 1 in 3 patients report persistent symptoms and experience long-term consequences interfering with daily functioning, known as persistent concussion symptoms (PCS). Evidence suggests PCS is (partly) maintained by anxious thoughts about brain functioning, recovery, and experienced symptoms, leading to avoidance behaviors, which may prevent patients from meeting life demands. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a newly developed intensive exposure intervention for individuals with PCS after concussion aimed to tackle avoidance behavior.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants took part in the intervention at the Maastricht University faculty.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four participants who experienced PCS after concussion partook in the exploratory study. Participants' age ranged between 20 and 32 (mean = 26.5, SD = 5.9) years, with an average length of time after the concussion of 9.8 months.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A concurrent multiple-baseline single-case design was conducted. The baseline period (A phase) length was randomly determined across participants (3, 4, 5, or 6 weeks). The exposure intervention (B phase) was conducted by psychologists over a 4-week period and consisted of 3 stages: exploration (2 sessions), active exposure (12 sessions conducted over 1 week), and 2 booster sessions.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Participants answered daily questions on a visual analog scale related to symptom experience, satisfaction with daily functioning, and degree of avoidance of feared activities. Additional outcomes included symptom severity, catastrophizing, fear of mental activity, anxiety, depression, and societal participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tau-U yielded significant effects ( P < .05) for all participants on all measures when comparing baseline and intervention phases. The pooled standardized mean difference was high for all measures (symptom experience = 0.93, satisfaction of daily functioning = 1.86, and activity avoidance = -2.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results show efficacy of the newly developed intensive exposure treatment for PCS after concussion, which is based on the fear avoidance model. Replication in a larger heterogeneous sample is warranted and needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E419-E429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: After a concussion, 1 in 3 patients report persistent symptoms and experience long-term consequences interfering with daily functioning, known as persistent concussion symptoms (PCS). Evidence suggests PCS is (partly) maintained by anxious thoughts about brain functioning, recovery, and experienced symptoms, leading to avoidance behaviors, which may prevent patients from meeting life demands. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a newly developed intensive exposure intervention for individuals with PCS after concussion aimed to tackle avoidance behavior.

Setting: Participants took part in the intervention at the Maastricht University faculty.

Participants: Four participants who experienced PCS after concussion partook in the exploratory study. Participants' age ranged between 20 and 32 (mean = 26.5, SD = 5.9) years, with an average length of time after the concussion of 9.8 months.

Design: A concurrent multiple-baseline single-case design was conducted. The baseline period (A phase) length was randomly determined across participants (3, 4, 5, or 6 weeks). The exposure intervention (B phase) was conducted by psychologists over a 4-week period and consisted of 3 stages: exploration (2 sessions), active exposure (12 sessions conducted over 1 week), and 2 booster sessions.

Main measures: Participants answered daily questions on a visual analog scale related to symptom experience, satisfaction with daily functioning, and degree of avoidance of feared activities. Additional outcomes included symptom severity, catastrophizing, fear of mental activity, anxiety, depression, and societal participation.

Results: Tau-U yielded significant effects ( P < .05) for all participants on all measures when comparing baseline and intervention phases. The pooled standardized mean difference was high for all measures (symptom experience = 0.93, satisfaction of daily functioning = 1.86, and activity avoidance = -2.05).

Conclusions: The results show efficacy of the newly developed intensive exposure treatment for PCS after concussion, which is based on the fear avoidance model. Replication in a larger heterogeneous sample is warranted and needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对脑震荡后症状持续存在者的强化暴露干预的效果:同期多基线单病例实验设计 (SCED) 研究》。
目的:脑震荡后,每 3 名患者中就有 1 人报告有持续性症状,并经历影响日常功能的长期后果,即所谓的持续性脑震荡症状(PCS)。有证据表明,PCS(部分)是由对大脑功能、恢复和所经历的症状的焦虑想法所维持,从而导致回避行为,这可能会妨碍患者满足生活需求。我们的目的是研究一种新开发的针对脑震荡后 PCS 患者的强化暴露干预的效果,旨在解决回避行为:参与者在马斯特里赫特大学学院参加干预:四名脑震荡后出现 PCS 的参与者参加了这项探索性研究。参与者的年龄在 20 到 32 岁之间(平均 = 26.5,SD = 5.9),脑震荡后的平均时间为 9.8 个月:设计:采用同期多基线单病例设计。基线期(A 阶段)的长度由参与者随机决定(3、4、5 或 6 周)。暴露干预(B 阶段)由心理学家进行,为期 4 周,包括 3 个阶段:探索(2 次)、主动暴露(12 次,为期 1 周)和 2 次强化训练:主要测量方法:参加者每天用视觉模拟量表回答与症状体验、对日常功能的满意度以及对恐惧活动的回避程度有关的问题。其他结果包括症状严重程度、灾难化、对心理活动的恐惧、焦虑、抑郁和社会参与:在比较基线阶段和干预阶段时,Tau-U 对所有参与者的所有测量结果都有显著影响(P < .05)。所有测量指标的集合标准化均值差异都很高(症状体验 = 0.93、日常功能满意度 = 1.86 和活动回避 = -2.05):结果表明,新开发的基于恐惧回避模型的脑震荡后PCS强化暴露疗法具有疗效。有必要在更大的异质性样本中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Video Head Impulse Test in Survivors From Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: New Perspectives for Implementation of Assessment in Rehabilitation. Characterizing the Association Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Discontinuation of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in a Commercially Insured Adult Population. Decisional Needs of Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Initiating Treatment for Insomnia Disorder and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Research Letter: Characterizing Lifetime Mild TBI Exposure Among Female and Male Military Service Members and Veterans in the LIMBIC-CENC Study. Risk of Traumatic Brain Injury in Deployment and Nondeployment Settings Among Members of the Millennium Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1