Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant-abutment complex.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of prosthodontic research Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253
Tobias Graf, Elisabeth Völler, Kurt Erdelt, Michael Stimmelmayr, Oliver Schubert, Jan-Frederik Güth
{"title":"Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant-abutment complex.","authors":"Tobias Graf, Elisabeth Völler, Kurt Erdelt, Michael Stimmelmayr, Oliver Schubert, Jan-Frederik Güth","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study investigated the influence of material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height on the biomechanical behavior of monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (HACs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety implants were embedded in accordance with ISO standard 14801; ninety HACs were mounted (N=90). Monolithic crowns with varying group-specific designs were luted using titanium bases. HACs were fabricated from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) or zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS). The crown morphology was either maxillary premolar (LD_PM, ZLS_PM) or molar (LD_MO). The three groups were further divided into three subgroups of ten specimens, each designed with a small (7.5 mm), middle (10.5 mm), and high (13.5 mm) configuration of crown heights (N=10). A load-to-failure test at 30° off-axis was conducted using a universal testing machine until failure. For statistical analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All LD_MO groups presented the highest failure values (808.7 to 947.9 N), followed by the LD_PM (525.8 to 722.8 N) and ZLS_PM groups (312.6 to 478.8N). A comparison between LD and ZLS materials (P < 0.001) as well as the crown morphology (P < 0.001) showed significant differences in failure values. The values in the subgroups of ZLS_PM (low, middle, high) decreased as the crown height increased. The fracture modes showed no consistent patterns across the test groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height appear to be important factors that may influence the clinical failure values and patterns of HACs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study investigated the influence of material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height on the biomechanical behavior of monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (HACs).

Methods: Ninety implants were embedded in accordance with ISO standard 14801; ninety HACs were mounted (N=90). Monolithic crowns with varying group-specific designs were luted using titanium bases. HACs were fabricated from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) or zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS). The crown morphology was either maxillary premolar (LD_PM, ZLS_PM) or molar (LD_MO). The three groups were further divided into three subgroups of ten specimens, each designed with a small (7.5 mm), middle (10.5 mm), and high (13.5 mm) configuration of crown heights (N=10). A load-to-failure test at 30° off-axis was conducted using a universal testing machine until failure. For statistical analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted (P < 0.05).

Results: All LD_MO groups presented the highest failure values (808.7 to 947.9 N), followed by the LD_PM (525.8 to 722.8 N) and ZLS_PM groups (312.6 to 478.8N). A comparison between LD and ZLS materials (P < 0.001) as well as the crown morphology (P < 0.001) showed significant differences in failure values. The values in the subgroups of ZLS_PM (low, middle, high) decreased as the crown height increased. The fracture modes showed no consistent patterns across the test groups.

Conclusions: Material selection, crown morphology, and vertical crown height appear to be important factors that may influence the clinical failure values and patterns of HACs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整体混合基台冠:牙冠高度、牙冠形态和材料对种植体-基台复合体的影响。
目的:这项体外研究调查了材料选择、冠形态和垂直冠高度对整体混合基台冠(HACs)生物力学行为的影响:根据 ISO 标准 14801 植入九十颗种植体;安装九十个 HAC(N=90)。使用钛基底安装了不同组别设计的整体牙冠。HAC由单片二硅酸锂陶瓷(LD)或氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷(ZLS)制成。牙冠形态为上颌前磨牙(LD_PM,ZLS_PM)或臼齿(LD_MO)。三组又分为三个子组,每个子组有十个试样,每个试样的牙冠高度分别为小冠(7.5 毫米)、中冠(10.5 毫米)和高冠(13.5 毫米)(N=10)。使用万能试验机在偏离轴线 30° 的情况下进行加载至失效试验,直至失效。统计分析采用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验(P < 0.05):所有 LD_MO 组的破坏值最高(808.7 至 947.9 牛顿),其次是 LD_PM(525.8 至 722.8 牛顿)和 ZLS_PM 组(312.6 至 478.8 牛顿)。LD 和 ZLS 材料(P < 0.001)以及牙冠形态(P < 0.001)之间的比较显示,失败值存在显著差异。随着牙冠高度的增加,ZLS_PM(低、中、高)亚组中的数值也随之降低。各测试组的断裂模式并不一致:材料选择、牙冠形态和垂直牙冠高度似乎是影响 HACs 临床失败值和模式的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of conventional versus additive cast-fabrication in implant prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies Efficacy of initial conservative treatment options for temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Effectiveness of keratinized mucosa augmentation procedures around dental implants based on risk assessment: A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Evaluation of hypermobile teeth deviation during impression taking in a partially edentulous dental arch: An in vitro study comparing digital and conventional impression techniques. Single-cell analysis of peri-implant gingival tissue to assess implant biocompatibility and immune response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1