Exploring trainee perspectives on barriers and facilitators in serious mental illness doctoral training.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1037/ser0000853
Katrina S Rbeiz, Jessica C Badawi, Chyna J Parker, Emily Blanco, Calvary Fielden, Alex Curland, Halle Ross-Young, Morgan Hill, Madeline Ward, Allison Mafarjeh, Michael Vitro, Erica Lee, Charlie A Davidson, Samantha J Reznik
{"title":"Exploring trainee perspectives on barriers and facilitators in serious mental illness doctoral training.","authors":"Katrina S Rbeiz, Jessica C Badawi, Chyna J Parker, Emily Blanco, Calvary Fielden, Alex Curland, Halle Ross-Young, Morgan Hill, Madeline Ward, Allison Mafarjeh, Michael Vitro, Erica Lee, Charlie A Davidson, Samantha J Reznik","doi":"10.1037/ser0000853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there have been momentous and critical advancements in serious mental illness (SMI) psychology doctoral training models and competencies, there is still much systemic change needed to increase access to evidence-based SMI training for psychologists. In the last decade, there has been little to no growth or expansion of SMI training opportunities in clinical psychology doctoral programs in the United States, and psychologists are underrepresented in serving clients with SMI. As trainees and trainers committed to careers in SMI, the contributors aimed to identify barriers and facilitators throughout each stage of the SMI doctoral training pathway, including pregraduate school, graduate school, and internship to reflect critically on systemic issues that have impeded trainees from accessing the appropriate tools for SMI training. This conceptual article reviews the existing literature on barriers and facilitators to accessing SMI training. In centering trainee perspectives, the contributors also reflect on their own experiences through brief narratives illustrating the barriers and facilitators they have faced across training stages with existing empirical research. Recommendations made by the contributors include increasing access to financial support and mechanisms, diversifying departments and practicum sites to include SMI-focused training, and people in positions of power advocating for and centering trainee voices in departmental training decisions and development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"20-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there have been momentous and critical advancements in serious mental illness (SMI) psychology doctoral training models and competencies, there is still much systemic change needed to increase access to evidence-based SMI training for psychologists. In the last decade, there has been little to no growth or expansion of SMI training opportunities in clinical psychology doctoral programs in the United States, and psychologists are underrepresented in serving clients with SMI. As trainees and trainers committed to careers in SMI, the contributors aimed to identify barriers and facilitators throughout each stage of the SMI doctoral training pathway, including pregraduate school, graduate school, and internship to reflect critically on systemic issues that have impeded trainees from accessing the appropriate tools for SMI training. This conceptual article reviews the existing literature on barriers and facilitators to accessing SMI training. In centering trainee perspectives, the contributors also reflect on their own experiences through brief narratives illustrating the barriers and facilitators they have faced across training stages with existing empirical research. Recommendations made by the contributors include increasing access to financial support and mechanisms, diversifying departments and practicum sites to include SMI-focused training, and people in positions of power advocating for and centering trainee voices in departmental training decisions and development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从受训人员的角度探讨严重精神疾病博士培训中的障碍和促进因素。
尽管在重性精神疾病(SMI)心理学博士培训模式和能力方面已经取得了重大而关键的进步,但要让更多的心理学家接受以证据为基础的 SMI 培训,仍然需要进行大量的系统性变革。在过去的十年中,美国临床心理学博士项目中的重性精神疾病培训机会几乎没有增长或扩大,心理学家在为重性精神疾病患者提供服务方面的代表性不足。作为致力于从事 SMI 工作的受训者和培训者,撰稿人旨在确定 SMI 博士培训途径中每个阶段的障碍和促进因素,包括研究生预科、研究生院和实习,从而批判性地反思阻碍受训者获得适当的 SMI 培训工具的系统性问题。这篇概念性文章回顾了现有文献中关于获得 SMI 培训的障碍和促进因素的内容。在以受训者的视角为中心的同时,撰稿人还通过简短的叙述反思了自己的经历,并结合现有的实证研究,说明了他们在各个培训阶段所面临的障碍和促进因素。撰稿人提出的建议包括:增加获得财政支持的机会和机制;使部门和实习地点多样化,以包括以 SMI 为重点的培训;在部门培训决策和发展中,由有权力的人倡导并以受训者的声音为中心。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
The impact of patient barriers and organizational factors on treatment dropout in posttraumatic stress disorder specialty care. Equity-grounded implementation science: Comparative case analysis of three studies. Social media content and suicidality: Implications for practice. Patterns of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scale elevation across veterans seen in a Veterans Affairs (VA) assessment clinic: The impact of compensation status. What do primary care clinicians and patients think about internet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for depression? A qualitative study from the Veterans Health Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1