Predictors of outcomes 3 to 12 months after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0288
Younes Iderdar, Maryem Arraji, Nadia Al Wachami, Morad Guennouni, Karima Boumendil, Yassmine Mourajid, Noureddine Elkhoudri, Elmadani Saad, Mohamed Chahboune
{"title":"Predictors of outcomes 3 to 12 months after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Younes Iderdar, Maryem Arraji, Nadia Al Wachami, Morad Guennouni, Karima Boumendil, Yassmine Mourajid, Noureddine Elkhoudri, Elmadani Saad, Mohamed Chahboune","doi":"10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The exact factors predicting outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain elusive. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined factors influencing outcomes in adult patients with TBI, from 3 months to 1 year after injury. A search of four electronic databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect-yielded 29 studies for review and 16 for meta-analysis, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. In patients with TBI of any severity, mean differences were observed in age (8.72 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.77-12.66 years), lymphocyte count (-0.15 109/L; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.11), glucose levels (1.20 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.73-1.68), and haemoglobin levels (-0.91 g/dL; 95% CI, -1.49 to -0.33) between those with favourable and unfavourable outcomes. The prevalence rates of unfavourable outcomes were as follows: abnormal cisterns, 65.7%; intracranial pressure above 20 mmHg, 52.9%; midline shift of 5 mm or more, 63%; hypotension, 71%; hypoxia, 86.8%; blood transfusion, 70.3%; and mechanical ventilation, 90%. Several predictors were strongly associated with outcome. Specifically, age, lymphocyte count, glucose level, haemoglobin level, severity of TBI, pupillary reaction, and type of injury were identified as potential predictors of long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38949,"journal":{"name":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exact factors predicting outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain elusive. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined factors influencing outcomes in adult patients with TBI, from 3 months to 1 year after injury. A search of four electronic databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect-yielded 29 studies for review and 16 for meta-analysis, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. In patients with TBI of any severity, mean differences were observed in age (8.72 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.77-12.66 years), lymphocyte count (-0.15 109/L; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.11), glucose levels (1.20 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.73-1.68), and haemoglobin levels (-0.91 g/dL; 95% CI, -1.49 to -0.33) between those with favourable and unfavourable outcomes. The prevalence rates of unfavourable outcomes were as follows: abnormal cisterns, 65.7%; intracranial pressure above 20 mmHg, 52.9%; midline shift of 5 mm or more, 63%; hypotension, 71%; hypoxia, 86.8%; blood transfusion, 70.3%; and mechanical ventilation, 90%. Several predictors were strongly associated with outcome. Specifically, age, lymphocyte count, glucose level, haemoglobin level, severity of TBI, pupillary reaction, and type of injury were identified as potential predictors of long-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑外伤后 3 至 12 个月的预后因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
预测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后疗效的确切因素仍然难以捉摸。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们研究了影响创伤性脑损伤成年患者伤后 3 个月至 1 年的预后的因素。根据 "系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 "指南,我们检索了四个电子数据库--PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 ScienceDirect--共获得 29 项综述研究和 16 项荟萃分析研究。在任何严重程度的创伤性脑损伤患者中,观察到有利结果和不利结果的患者在年龄(8.72 岁;95% 置信区间 [CI],4.77-12.66 岁)、淋巴细胞计数(-0.15 109/L;95% CI,-0.18--0.11)、血糖水平(1.20 mmol/L;95% CI,0.73-1.68)和血红蛋白水平(-0.91 g/dL;95% CI,-1.49--0.33)方面存在平均差异。不利结果的发生率如下:蝶窦异常,65.7%;颅内压高于 20 mmHg,52.9%;中线移位 5 mm 或以上,63%;低血压,71%;缺氧,86.8%;输血,70.3%;机械通气,90%。有几项预测因素与预后密切相关。具体而言,年龄、淋巴细胞计数、血糖水平、血红蛋白水平、创伤性脑损伤的严重程度、瞳孔反应和损伤类型被确定为长期预后的潜在预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associations of type and intensity of social participation with depression, self-rated health, and life satisfaction among community-dwelling older adults in the Republic of Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Individual and contextual factors associated with measles infection in Malaysia: a multilevel analysis. Rural-urban differences in common mental disorders among Indonesian youth: a cross-sectional national survey. Methodology of comparative studies on the relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review. BCED-Net: Breast Cancer Ensemble Diagnosis Network using transfer learning and the XGBoost classifier with mammography images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1