Jonathan Wehrend MD, David Gimarc MD, Zachary R Ashwell MD, Alexandria Jensen PhD, Nancy Major MD, Corey K Ho
{"title":"The effect of gadolinium-based intravenous contrast in the initial characterization of musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors","authors":"Jonathan Wehrend MD, David Gimarc MD, Zachary R Ashwell MD, Alexandria Jensen PhD, Nancy Major MD, Corey K Ho","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine if gadolinium-based contrast agents increase the sensitivity, specificity or reader confidence of malignant potential in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pre- and post-contrast MRI studies from 87 patients were read by three independent radiologists of different experience. Readers noted malignant potential and confidence in their diagnosis based on pre-contrast and post-contrast MRI studies. Statistical models assessed for agreement between MRI reader diagnosis and pathologic results as well as analyzing effects of contrast on reader confidence. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of malignant potential were also calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>87 patients (48 benign and 39 malignant; mean [± SD] age 51 ± 17.9 and 57.1 ± 17.1, respectively) were evaluated. For all readers, pre-contrast and post-contrast sensitivities were 68.1 % and 70.6 % while pre-contrast and post-contrast specificities were 84.6 % and 83.8 %, respectively without significant change (p=0.88). There was not a significant association with the use of contrast and prediction of malignant potential with or without the resident reader (p=0.65 and p=0.82). Use of contrast was significantly associated with higher levels of reader confidence (p=0.02) for all readers. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were in good agreement (W = 0.77 and 0.70).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The addition of a post-contrast sequence increased reader confidence in their diagnosis without a corresponding significant increase in accurate prediction of malignant potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 470-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine if gadolinium-based contrast agents increase the sensitivity, specificity or reader confidence of malignant potential in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.
Methods
Pre- and post-contrast MRI studies from 87 patients were read by three independent radiologists of different experience. Readers noted malignant potential and confidence in their diagnosis based on pre-contrast and post-contrast MRI studies. Statistical models assessed for agreement between MRI reader diagnosis and pathologic results as well as analyzing effects of contrast on reader confidence. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of malignant potential were also calculated.
Results
87 patients (48 benign and 39 malignant; mean [± SD] age 51 ± 17.9 and 57.1 ± 17.1, respectively) were evaluated. For all readers, pre-contrast and post-contrast sensitivities were 68.1 % and 70.6 % while pre-contrast and post-contrast specificities were 84.6 % and 83.8 %, respectively without significant change (p=0.88). There was not a significant association with the use of contrast and prediction of malignant potential with or without the resident reader (p=0.65 and p=0.82). Use of contrast was significantly associated with higher levels of reader confidence (p=0.02) for all readers. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were in good agreement (W = 0.77 and 0.70).
Conclusion
The addition of a post-contrast sequence increased reader confidence in their diagnosis without a corresponding significant increase in accurate prediction of malignant potential.
期刊介绍:
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.