Level of Awareness of Certified Non-critical Care Physicians in Diagnosing, Managing, and Disposing Anaphylactic Cases.

Dalal Almarri, Fatimah Badghaish, Dalal Albaiji, Areen Alamri, Rawan Alghamdi, Rehab Alghamdi, Faisal Alkhadra, Nisreen Maghraby
{"title":"Level of Awareness of Certified Non-critical Care Physicians in Diagnosing, Managing, and Disposing Anaphylactic Cases.","authors":"Dalal Almarri, Fatimah Badghaish, Dalal Albaiji, Areen Alamri, Rawan Alghamdi, Rehab Alghamdi, Faisal Alkhadra, Nisreen Maghraby","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2024.78.44-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anaphylaxis is known as an acute, severe hypersensitivity reaction that rapidly initiates after exposure to a triggering agent. It is a life-threatening condition, and early recognition and swift intervention are crucial to saving patients' lives. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the ability of certified non-critical care physicians to recognize, manage, and dispose cases of anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey consisting of 19 questions was developed by expert emergency consultants to evaluate physicians' knowledge regarding the recognition, management, and disposition of anaphylactic episodes. Responses were collected through in-person surveys conducted with physicians from various specialties and varying clinical experience levels at a tertiary care center in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a total of 173 physicians completed the survey, with 81.5% being consultants and 18.5% specialists. Only 5.2% correctly identified all three proposed anaphylaxis clinical scenarios, 16.8% identified two scenarios correctly, and 51.4% identified only one scenario. While 42.8% recognized the first-line management of anaphylaxis, only 24.3% and 24.9% knew the correct epinephrine dose and route, respectively. Regarding the disposition of patients experiencing an anaphylactic episode, 61.9% of responders opted to dispose the case to the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals a knowledge gap among non-critical care physicians practicing in a tertiary care center concerning the identification and management of anaphylaxis. Raising awareness of this life-threatening condition is imperative to address this serious issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"78 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2024.78.44-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is known as an acute, severe hypersensitivity reaction that rapidly initiates after exposure to a triggering agent. It is a life-threatening condition, and early recognition and swift intervention are crucial to saving patients' lives. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the ability of certified non-critical care physicians to recognize, manage, and dispose cases of anaphylaxis.

Methods: A survey consisting of 19 questions was developed by expert emergency consultants to evaluate physicians' knowledge regarding the recognition, management, and disposition of anaphylactic episodes. Responses were collected through in-person surveys conducted with physicians from various specialties and varying clinical experience levels at a tertiary care center in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Results: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 173 physicians completed the survey, with 81.5% being consultants and 18.5% specialists. Only 5.2% correctly identified all three proposed anaphylaxis clinical scenarios, 16.8% identified two scenarios correctly, and 51.4% identified only one scenario. While 42.8% recognized the first-line management of anaphylaxis, only 24.3% and 24.9% knew the correct epinephrine dose and route, respectively. Regarding the disposition of patients experiencing an anaphylactic episode, 61.9% of responders opted to dispose the case to the emergency department.

Conclusion: Our study reveals a knowledge gap among non-critical care physicians practicing in a tertiary care center concerning the identification and management of anaphylaxis. Raising awareness of this life-threatening condition is imperative to address this serious issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认证的非重症监护医生对过敏性病例的诊断、管理和处置的认识水平。
背景:众所周知,过敏性休克是一种急性、严重的超敏反应,在接触诱发剂后迅速启动。过敏性休克危及生命,早期识别和迅速干预是挽救患者生命的关键。研究目的本研究旨在评估认证的非重症监护医生识别、管理和处置过敏性休克病例的能力:方法:急诊专家顾问编制了一份包含 19 个问题的调查问卷,以评估医生对过敏性休克病例的识别、管理和处置知识。调查对象为沙特阿拉伯东部省一家三级医疗中心的不同专业和不同临床经验水平的医生:在这项横断面研究中,共有 173 名医生完成了调查,其中 81.5% 为顾问医生,18.5% 为专科医生。只有 5.2% 的医生能正确识别所有三种过敏性休克临床情景,16.8% 的医生能正确识别两种情景,51.4% 的医生只能识别一种情景。虽然 42.8% 的人知道过敏性休克的一线处理方法,但只有 24.3% 和 24.9% 的人分别知道正确的肾上腺素剂量和途径。关于过敏性休克患者的处置,61.9%的应答者选择将病例送往急诊科:我们的研究表明,在三级医疗中心执业的非重症监护医生对过敏性休克的识别和处理存在知识差距。要解决这一严重问题,当务之急是提高人们对这种危及生命的疾病的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
C-reactive Protein Levels in Prediction of the Development or the Progression of Agerelated Macular Degeneration in Patients Examined at Tuzla Canton. Serum Concentrations of IL-18, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, IL-27, and IL-31 in Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Their Correlation With Disease Severity. Sympathetic Ophthalmia After Complicated Cataract Surgery. Comparison and Relationship of Isometric Strength, Range of Motion, Ankle Mobility in Participants with Normal Medial Longitudinal Arch and Flat Foot. The Correlation Between Plasma Bilirubin Concentrations and Glomerular Filtration Rate and Creatinine in Type 2 Diabetes with Renal Damage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1