Sex Workers’ Experiences of Screening for Intimate Partner Violence

Jessica L. Zemlak, Kamila A. Alexander, Deborah Wilson, Randi Singer, Joni S. Williams, Susan G. Sherman
{"title":"Sex Workers’ Experiences of Screening for Intimate Partner Violence","authors":"Jessica L. Zemlak,&nbsp;Kamila A. Alexander,&nbsp;Deborah Wilson,&nbsp;Randi Singer,&nbsp;Joni S. Williams,&nbsp;Susan G. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening among women who sell sex.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Telephone interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic (June 2020 to October 2020).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Women aged 18 to 49 years who sold or traded sex for food, drugs, money, or shelter at least three times during the past 3 months before recruitment (<em>N</em> = 22).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used individual, semistructured telephone interviews to collect data about participants’ experiences with IPV and IPV screening during health care encounters. We used reflexive thematic analysis to examine these data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified two overarching themes related to IPV screening experiences: <em>Preferences for IPV Screening</em> and <em>Barriers to Disclosure of IPV Experiences</em>. Participants described a preference for IPV screening done face-to-face with providers who show a genuine interest in their responses. Stigma was a barrier of IPV disclosure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health care providers are a trusted safety net for disclosure of IPV experiences. Providing screening in a trauma-informed, nonstigmatizing manner may facilitate disclosure of IPV by women who sell sex. Future research among marginalized populations is needed to examine ways to address IPV in clinical settings with a harm reduction empowerment lens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 397-405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening among women who sell sex.

Design

A qualitative descriptive study.

Setting

Telephone interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic (June 2020 to October 2020).

Participants

Women aged 18 to 49 years who sold or traded sex for food, drugs, money, or shelter at least three times during the past 3 months before recruitment (N = 22).

Methods

We used individual, semistructured telephone interviews to collect data about participants’ experiences with IPV and IPV screening during health care encounters. We used reflexive thematic analysis to examine these data.

Results

We identified two overarching themes related to IPV screening experiences: Preferences for IPV Screening and Barriers to Disclosure of IPV Experiences. Participants described a preference for IPV screening done face-to-face with providers who show a genuine interest in their responses. Stigma was a barrier of IPV disclosure.

Conclusion

Health care providers are a trusted safety net for disclosure of IPV experiences. Providing screening in a trauma-informed, nonstigmatizing manner may facilitate disclosure of IPV by women who sell sex. Future research among marginalized populations is needed to examine ways to address IPV in clinical settings with a harm reduction empowerment lens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性工作者筛查亲密伴侣暴力的经历
研究卖春妇女的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)筛查经历。定性描述性研究。在 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 6 月至 2020 年 10 月)进行电话访谈。年龄在 18 至 49 岁之间,在招募前的过去 3 个月中至少有 3 次通过性交易换取食物、毒品、金钱或住所的女性(= 22)。我们采用个人半结构化电话访谈的方式,收集参与者在就医过程中遭遇 IPV 和 IPV 筛查的相关数据。我们使用反思性主题分析法来研究这些数据。我们确定了两个与 IPV 筛查经历相关的首要主题:和 。参与者表示,他们更倾向于与医疗服务提供者面对面地进行 IPV 筛查,因为医疗服务提供者会对他们的回答表现出真正的兴趣。耻辱感是披露 IPV 的障碍。医疗服务提供者是披露 IPV 经历的可信安全网。以创伤知情、无污名化的方式提供筛查可能会促进卖春妇女披露 IPV。未来需要在边缘化人群中开展研究,探讨如何在临床环境中以减低伤害、增强能力的视角来解决 IPV 问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Case Report of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications. Secondary Qualitative Analysis of Stigmatizing and Nonstigmatizing Language Used in Hospital Birth Settings. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Nurse Perceptions of Barriers to Infection Prevention and Control in Labor and Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1