Biomethane production using goat manure and cheese whey: statistical analysis of the effect of mixture composition

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s43153-024-00442-2
{"title":"Biomethane production using goat manure and cheese whey: statistical analysis of the effect of mixture composition","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s43153-024-00442-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Lignocellulosic biomass and agricultural residues rich in carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins are promising sources for renewable energy production, particularly in the field of biofuel. Goat manure (GM) is a suitable raw material for the anaerobic digestion process owing to its high total nitrogen content, besides providing stability to fermentation. However, its utilization results in a relatively low biogas production yield. This yield can be significantly increased by co-digesting animal manure with co-substrates such as cheese whey (CW). Therefore, this study applied the Simplex Lattice experimental design to verify the biomethane production through different mixture concentrations of goat manure and cheese whey using bench reactors in batch mode. The volumetric compositions (CW<sub>100</sub>/GM<sub>0</sub>, CW<sub>75</sub>/GM<sub>25</sub>, CW<sub>50</sub>/GM<sub>50</sub>, CW<sub>25</sub>/GM<sub>75</sub>, CW<sub>0</sub>/GM<sub>100</sub>) were evaluated by adjusting linear and quadratic models. The results presented COD removal efficiencies between 40.07 and 63.73% and total volatile solids removal between 22.87 and 58.99%. According to the statistical analysis of the Simplex Lattice design, co-digestion showed favorability for methane production compared to goat manure alone. Furthermore, the maximum methane production yield (MY<sub>COD</sub>) was 319.89 mL-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD, with a productivity rate (MYPR) of 3.39 mL-CH<sub>4</sub>/gCOD.d. These maximum values were observed in the CW<sub>75</sub>/GM<sub>25</sub> condition. The quadratic model exhibited the best fit for the design adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9194,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-024-00442-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass and agricultural residues rich in carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins are promising sources for renewable energy production, particularly in the field of biofuel. Goat manure (GM) is a suitable raw material for the anaerobic digestion process owing to its high total nitrogen content, besides providing stability to fermentation. However, its utilization results in a relatively low biogas production yield. This yield can be significantly increased by co-digesting animal manure with co-substrates such as cheese whey (CW). Therefore, this study applied the Simplex Lattice experimental design to verify the biomethane production through different mixture concentrations of goat manure and cheese whey using bench reactors in batch mode. The volumetric compositions (CW100/GM0, CW75/GM25, CW50/GM50, CW25/GM75, CW0/GM100) were evaluated by adjusting linear and quadratic models. The results presented COD removal efficiencies between 40.07 and 63.73% and total volatile solids removal between 22.87 and 58.99%. According to the statistical analysis of the Simplex Lattice design, co-digestion showed favorability for methane production compared to goat manure alone. Furthermore, the maximum methane production yield (MYCOD) was 319.89 mL-CH4/gCOD, with a productivity rate (MYPR) of 3.39 mL-CH4/gCOD.d. These maximum values were observed in the CW75/GM25 condition. The quadratic model exhibited the best fit for the design adopted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用羊粪和奶酪乳清生产生物甲烷:混合物成分影响的统计分析
摘要 富含碳水化合物、脂类和蛋白质的木质纤维素生物质和农业残留物是生产可再生能源,尤其是生物燃料领域前景广阔的来源。羊粪(GM)是一种适合厌氧消化工艺的原料,因为其总氮含量高,而且对发酵具有稳定性。然而,利用羊粪产生的沼气产量相对较低。通过将动物粪便与奶酪乳清(CW)等辅助基质共同消化,可以大大提高沼气产量。因此,本研究采用简单网格实验设计,以间歇模式使用台式反应器,通过山羊粪便和干酪乳清的不同混合浓度来验证生物甲烷的产量。通过调整线性和二次模型,对体积成分(CW100/GM0、CW75/GM25、CW50/GM50、CW25/GM75、CW0/GM100)进行了评估。结果表明,化学需氧量去除率在 40.07% 至 63.73% 之间,总挥发性固体去除率在 22.87% 至 58.99% 之间。根据简单网格设计的统计分析,与单独处理羊粪相比,联合消化有利于甲烷的产生。此外,最大甲烷产量(MYCOD)为 319.89 mL-CH4/gCOD,生产率(MYPR)为 3.39 mL-CH4/gCOD.d。二次模型显示出与所采用设计的最佳拟合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering is a quarterly publication of the Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering - ABEQ) aiming at publishing papers reporting on basic and applied research and innovation in the field of chemical engineering and related areas.
期刊最新文献
C4 hydrocarbons to value-added chemicals over Keggin-type heteropolyacids: structure-properties, reaction parameters, and mechanisms Utilization of blue light-emitting diodes in Ensifer meliloti cultivation for enhanced production of antioxidant biopolymers Correlation of the solubility of isoniazid in some aqueous cosolvent mixtures using different mathematical models Doehlert matrix-based optimization of degradation of Rhodamine B in a swirling flow photolytic reactor operated in recirculation mode Application of DieselB10 formulations with short-chain alcohols in diesel cycle engines: phase equilibrium, physicochemical and thermodynamic properties and power curves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1