Family satisfaction with involvement in decision making in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.

Ntombifikile Klaas, Onalenna Baliki
{"title":"Family satisfaction with involvement in decision making in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.","authors":"Ntombifikile Klaas, Onalenna Baliki","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.11.24304110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Decision making in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often complex, involving frequent interactions between patients, families, and health care professionals. Family members play an important role as surrogate decision markers because patients admitted in ICU lack decision- making capacity due to their critical state. Lack of regular, timeous, up to date and honest information provided by the ICU healthcare professionals may negatively influence the family members’ decision making ability and overall satisfaction. Aim: To identify existing literature that describe family satisfaction with involvement in decision making in the intensive care unit. Methods: A scoping review of literature guided by Arksey and O ‘Malley’s framework was conducted. Literature search was completed using five databases. Primary studies published in English between 2010 and 2023 were retrieved and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Of the 152 studies identified during the search, 23 were eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies (n = 19; 83%) focused on family satisfaction with care and decision making and four (n=4; 17%) focused on strategies aimed at enhancing family involvement in decision making. These strategies included: testing the effects of using information booklets, structured attendance of interdisciplinary ward rounds, development and implementation of evidence-based communication algorithm and exploring the culture of interprofessional collaboration. The three themes that emerged from the scoping review were: satisfaction with involvement, communication, and support. Conclusion: The use of structured communication programs as well as regular, timeous and honest information about the patient’s diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis are vital measures to enhancing family involvement in decision making.","PeriodicalId":501260,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nursing","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.11.24304110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decision making in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often complex, involving frequent interactions between patients, families, and health care professionals. Family members play an important role as surrogate decision markers because patients admitted in ICU lack decision- making capacity due to their critical state. Lack of regular, timeous, up to date and honest information provided by the ICU healthcare professionals may negatively influence the family members’ decision making ability and overall satisfaction. Aim: To identify existing literature that describe family satisfaction with involvement in decision making in the intensive care unit. Methods: A scoping review of literature guided by Arksey and O ‘Malley’s framework was conducted. Literature search was completed using five databases. Primary studies published in English between 2010 and 2023 were retrieved and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Of the 152 studies identified during the search, 23 were eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies (n = 19; 83%) focused on family satisfaction with care and decision making and four (n=4; 17%) focused on strategies aimed at enhancing family involvement in decision making. These strategies included: testing the effects of using information booklets, structured attendance of interdisciplinary ward rounds, development and implementation of evidence-based communication algorithm and exploring the culture of interprofessional collaboration. The three themes that emerged from the scoping review were: satisfaction with involvement, communication, and support. Conclusion: The use of structured communication programs as well as regular, timeous and honest information about the patient’s diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis are vital measures to enhancing family involvement in decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房中家属对参与决策的满意度:范围综述。
背景:重症监护室(ICU)中的决策通常比较复杂,涉及患者、家属和医护人员之间的频繁互动。由于入住重症监护室的患者病情危重,缺乏决策能力,因此家属作为代理决策人发挥着重要作用。如果重症监护室的医护人员不能提供定期、及时、最新和真实的信息,可能会对家属的决策能力和整体满意度产生负面影响。目的:查找现有文献,了解重症监护病房中家属对参与决策的满意度。方法:对相关文献进行范围界定:以 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架为指导,对文献进行了范围界定。使用五个数据库完成文献检索。检索了 2010 年至 2023 年间用英语发表的主要研究,并使用主题分析法进行了分析。结果:在检索到的 152 项研究中,有 23 项符合纳入条件。大多数研究(n=19;83%)侧重于家属对护理和决策的满意度,4 项研究(n=4;17%)侧重于旨在加强家属参与决策的策略。这些策略包括:测试使用信息手册的效果、有组织地参加跨学科查房、开发和实施循证沟通算法以及探索跨专业合作文化。范围界定审查得出的三个主题是:参与满意度、沟通和支持。结论使用结构化沟通计划以及定期、及时和诚实地提供有关病人诊断、治疗计划和预后的信息,是加强家属参与决策的重要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SLEEP QUALITY AND CIRCADIAN RHYTHM DISRUPTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT Past and present of registered nurse in China--descriptive analysis of longitudinal national statistics of registered nurse Integrating Heart Rate Variability and Psychometric Assessments to Evaluate Stress and Burnout in ICU Nursing Staff: A Pilot Study Enhancing Nursing Education through Mobile Health Clinics: Aligning AACN Core Competencies with Pediatric Clinical Experiences in Rural and Indigenous Communities Self-actualization of families with a cerebrovascular disease patient by nurses, and of self-actualization of nurses themselves: An integrative review based on Family Care/Caring Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1