Guillain-Barré syndrome and checkpoint inhibitor therapy: insights from pharmacovigilance data

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2023-000544
Andre Abrahao, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Mariana Rodrigues, Monica Mello, Osvaldo José Moreira Nascimento
{"title":"Guillain-Barré syndrome and checkpoint inhibitor therapy: insights from pharmacovigilance data","authors":"Andre Abrahao, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Mariana Rodrigues, Monica Mello, Osvaldo José Moreira Nascimento","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2023-000544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There are increasing reports of cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), as an adverse event of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) but postmarket data on the incidence of this remains scarce. This study sought to conduct a comprehensive review of GBS events arising as a secondary outcome of ICI treatments in real-world patients, using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods Data covering the period from the third quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2023 were extracted from the FAERS database. GBS cases (associated with the usage of avelumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) were subjected to disproportionality analysis to detect potential signals. Results A total of 2208 reports of GBS were identified within the FAERS database, with 242 of these cases (10.9%) being associated with ICIs. All five drugs exhibited a disproportionality in the reporting of adverse events, with the highest observed for avelumab (reporting OR, ROR: 29.8), followed by atezolizumab (ROR: 17.0), ipilimumab (ROR: 16.0), pembrolizumab (ROR: 11.9) and nivolumab (ROR: 8.2). Conclusion These checkpoint inhibitors are associated with a statistically significant disproportionate number of reports of GBS as an adverse event, with avelumab being the ICI with the highest association. The present pharmacovigilance study serves as a valuable tool, offering a more comprehensive and nuanced perspective on GBS associated with ICIs. This study contributes to a deeper comprehension of this rare adverse drug effect.","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2023-000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are increasing reports of cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), as an adverse event of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) but postmarket data on the incidence of this remains scarce. This study sought to conduct a comprehensive review of GBS events arising as a secondary outcome of ICI treatments in real-world patients, using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods Data covering the period from the third quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2023 were extracted from the FAERS database. GBS cases (associated with the usage of avelumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) were subjected to disproportionality analysis to detect potential signals. Results A total of 2208 reports of GBS were identified within the FAERS database, with 242 of these cases (10.9%) being associated with ICIs. All five drugs exhibited a disproportionality in the reporting of adverse events, with the highest observed for avelumab (reporting OR, ROR: 29.8), followed by atezolizumab (ROR: 17.0), ipilimumab (ROR: 16.0), pembrolizumab (ROR: 11.9) and nivolumab (ROR: 8.2). Conclusion These checkpoint inhibitors are associated with a statistically significant disproportionate number of reports of GBS as an adverse event, with avelumab being the ICI with the highest association. The present pharmacovigilance study serves as a valuable tool, offering a more comprehensive and nuanced perspective on GBS associated with ICIs. This study contributes to a deeper comprehension of this rare adverse drug effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格林-巴利综合征与检查点抑制剂疗法:药物警戒数据的启示
背景 有越来越多的报道称吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的一种不良反应,但有关其上市后发生率的数据仍然很少。本研究试图利用食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),对作为 ICI 治疗次要结果的 GBS 事件进行全面回顾。方法 从 FAERS 数据库中提取 2003 年第三季度至 2023 年第二季度的数据。对GBS病例(与使用阿维列单抗、阿特珠单抗、伊匹单抗、尼维单抗和彭博罗珠单抗有关)进行了比例失调分析,以检测潜在信号。结果 在FAERS数据库中共发现2208例GBS报告,其中242例(10.9%)与ICIs有关。所有五种药物在不良事件报告中都表现出不相称性,其中阿维列单抗的报告比例最高(报告OR,ROR:29.8),其次是阿特珠单抗(ROR:17.0)、伊匹单抗(ROR:16.0)、pembrolizumab(ROR:11.9)和nivolumab(ROR:8.2)。结论 这些检查点抑制剂与不良事件 GBS 相关的报告数量在统计学上明显不成比例,其中阿维单抗是相关性最高的 ICI。本药物警戒研究是一项有价值的工具,它从更全面、更细微的角度揭示了与 ICIs 相关的 GBS。这项研究有助于更深入地了解这种罕见的药物不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Undiagnosed major risk factors in acute ischaemic stroke patients in Qatar: analysis from the Qatar stroke registry. Late-onset myopathy responsive to immunomodulatory treatment: sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy without nemaline rods? Catatonia in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a case series and approach to improve outcomes with electroconvulsive therapy. Analysis of door-to-needle time for thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke using statistical process control charts. Statins are rarely prescribed for incidentally discovered covert cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective cohort in a large electronic health record (EHR) identified using natural language processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1