The Effects of Switching to Video Therapy on In-Session Processes in Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Susanne Edelbluth, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz
{"title":"The Effects of Switching to Video Therapy on In-Session Processes in Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Susanne Edelbluth,&nbsp;Brian Schwartz,&nbsp;Wolfgang Lutz","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01361-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective and Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of switching from face-to-face (f2f) psychotherapy to video therapy (VT) due to the COVID-19 pandemic on in-session processes, i.e., the therapeutic alliance, coping skills, and emotional involvement, as rated by both patients and therapists.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of <i>N</i> = 454 patients with mood or anxiety disorders were examined. The intervention group (IG) consisted of <i>n</i> = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who switched from f2f to VT, while the control group (CG) consisted of <i>n</i> = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who were treated f2f before the pandemic. To evaluate the effects of switching to VT on in-session processes, three longitudinal piecewise multilevel models, one per process variable, were fitted. Each process variable was regressed on the session number with a slope for the three sessions before switching to VT and a second slope for up to six VT sessions afterwards.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The therapeutic alliance significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups (IG and CG) and raters (patients and therapists) with no differences between IG and CG. On average, patients rated the therapeutic alliance better than therapists. Coping skills significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups and raters, but the CG rated coping skills higher than the IG after the switch. Overall, therapists rated coping skills higher than patients. Emotional involvement did not significantly increase after switching to VT across the two groups and raters and there was no significant difference between patient and therapist ratings.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>In conclusion, the switch to VT had no negative impact on the therapeutic alliance and emotional involvement. However, more coping skills were reported in the CG than in the IG after the switch to VT, which was mainly due to a stagnation in patient-rated coping skills in the IG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"51 4","pages":"428 - 438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01361-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective and Aim

This study aimed to assess the impact of switching from face-to-face (f2f) psychotherapy to video therapy (VT) due to the COVID-19 pandemic on in-session processes, i.e., the therapeutic alliance, coping skills, and emotional involvement, as rated by both patients and therapists.

Methods

A total of N = 454 patients with mood or anxiety disorders were examined. The intervention group (IG) consisted of n = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who switched from f2f to VT, while the control group (CG) consisted of n = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who were treated f2f before the pandemic. To evaluate the effects of switching to VT on in-session processes, three longitudinal piecewise multilevel models, one per process variable, were fitted. Each process variable was regressed on the session number with a slope for the three sessions before switching to VT and a second slope for up to six VT sessions afterwards.

Results

The therapeutic alliance significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups (IG and CG) and raters (patients and therapists) with no differences between IG and CG. On average, patients rated the therapeutic alliance better than therapists. Coping skills significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups and raters, but the CG rated coping skills higher than the IG after the switch. Overall, therapists rated coping skills higher than patients. Emotional involvement did not significantly increase after switching to VT across the two groups and raters and there was no significant difference between patient and therapist ratings.

Discussion

In conclusion, the switch to VT had no negative impact on the therapeutic alliance and emotional involvement. However, more coping skills were reported in the CG than in the IG after the switch to VT, which was mainly due to a stagnation in patient-rated coping skills in the IG.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间改用视频疗法对心理治疗过程的影响。
目的和宗旨:本研究旨在评估因COVID-19大流行而从面对面心理治疗(f2f)转为视频治疗(VT)对治疗过程(即治疗联盟、应对技能和情感投入)的影响,患者和治疗师均对此进行了评价:方法:共对 454 名情绪或焦虑症患者进行了研究。干预组(IG)由 n = 227 个患者-治疗师组合组成,他们从 f2f 转为 VT,而对照组(CG)由 n = 227 个患者-治疗师组合组成,他们在大流行前接受 f2f 治疗。为了评估转用 VT 对治疗过程的影响,我们建立了三个纵向分片多层次模型,每个过程变量一个。每个过程变量都与疗程次数相关,转用 VT 前的三次疗程为一个斜率,转用 VT 后的六次疗程为第二个斜率:从 f2f 转为 VT 后,两组(IG 和 CG)和评分者(患者和治疗师)之间的治疗联盟明显增加,IG 和 CG 之间没有差异。平均而言,患者对治疗联盟的评价优于治疗师。从 f2f 转为 VT 后,两组患者和评分者的应对技能都有明显提高,但 CG 在转为 VT 后对应对技能的评分高于 IG。总体而言,治疗师对应对技能的评价高于患者。在改用 VT 后,两组患者和评分者的情感投入并没有明显增加,患者和治疗师的评分也没有明显差异:总之,改用 VT 对治疗联盟和情感投入没有负面影响。然而,在改用 VT 后,CG 组比 IG 组报告了更多的应对技能,这主要是由于 IG 组患者评价的应对技能停滞不前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Treatment and Assessment for Youth (STAY): A Theoretically-Driven, Culturally-Tailored MBC Approach. A Model for Understanding Lived Expertise to Support Effective Recruitment of Peer Roles. Life After EBPs: Characterizing Subsequent Engagement in Evidence-Based Psychotherapy After Completion of an Initial Trauma-Focused EBP in a National Sample of VA Patients. Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation. Factors Influencing the Engagement with Electronic Mental Health Technologies: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1