Combined Use of Alkaline Agents With Low-Flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Models Preserving Inspiratory Efforts.
{"title":"Combined Use of Alkaline Agents With Low-Flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Models Preserving Inspiratory Efforts.","authors":"Tomonori Yamashita, Akinori Uchiyama, Yusuke Enokidani, Takeshi Yoshida, Yuji Fujino","doi":"10.6705/j.jacme.202403_14(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-flow extracorporeal CO <sub>2</sub> removal (ECCO <sub>2</sub> R), managed using a renal replacement platform, is useful in achieving lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volume. However, its capacity for CO <sub>2</sub> elimination is limited. Whether this system is valuable in reducing strong inspiratory efforts in respiratory failure is unclear. The combined use of alkaline agents with low-flow ECCO <sub>2</sub> R might be useful in hypercapnic subjects preserving inspiratory efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the effects of low-flow ECCO <sub>2</sub> R on respiratory status and investigated the effects of NaHCO <sub>3</sub> , trometamol, and saline on respiratory status during low-flow ECCO <sub>2</sub> R in CO <sub>2</sub> inhalation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although low-flow ECCO <sub>2</sub> R did not significantly change the respiratory rate (92.2% ± 24.3% [mean ± standard deviation] of that before ECCO <sub>2</sub> R), it reduced minute ventilation (MV) (78.9% ± 13.5% of that before ECCO <sub>2</sub> R). The addition of NaHCO <sub>3</sub> improved acidemia but did not change MV compared with that of the saline group (0.451 ± 0.026 L/min/kg body weight [BW] vs. 0.556 ± 0.138 L/min/kg BW, respectively). The addition of trometamol improved acidemia and reduced MV compared with that of the saline group (0.381 ± 0.050 L/min/kg BW vs. 0.556 ± 0.138 L/min/kg BW, respectively). The total amounts of CO <sub>2</sub> removed during ECCO <sub>2</sub> R in the NaHCO <sub>3</sub> group were lower than those in the saline and trometamol groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low-flow ECCO <sub>2</sub> R reduced MV in subjects preserving spontaneous breathing efforts with CO <sub>2</sub> overload. The addition of NaHCO <sub>3</sub> improved acidemia but did not change MV, whereas the addition of trometamol improved acidemia and reduced MV.</p>","PeriodicalId":14846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acute medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"28-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10933589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acute medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202403_14(1).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Low-flow extracorporeal CO 2 removal (ECCO 2 R), managed using a renal replacement platform, is useful in achieving lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volume. However, its capacity for CO 2 elimination is limited. Whether this system is valuable in reducing strong inspiratory efforts in respiratory failure is unclear. The combined use of alkaline agents with low-flow ECCO 2 R might be useful in hypercapnic subjects preserving inspiratory efforts.
Methods: This study examined the effects of low-flow ECCO 2 R on respiratory status and investigated the effects of NaHCO 3 , trometamol, and saline on respiratory status during low-flow ECCO 2 R in CO 2 inhalation models.
Results: Although low-flow ECCO 2 R did not significantly change the respiratory rate (92.2% ± 24.3% [mean ± standard deviation] of that before ECCO 2 R), it reduced minute ventilation (MV) (78.9% ± 13.5% of that before ECCO 2 R). The addition of NaHCO 3 improved acidemia but did not change MV compared with that of the saline group (0.451 ± 0.026 L/min/kg body weight [BW] vs. 0.556 ± 0.138 L/min/kg BW, respectively). The addition of trometamol improved acidemia and reduced MV compared with that of the saline group (0.381 ± 0.050 L/min/kg BW vs. 0.556 ± 0.138 L/min/kg BW, respectively). The total amounts of CO 2 removed during ECCO 2 R in the NaHCO 3 group were lower than those in the saline and trometamol groups.
Conclusion: The low-flow ECCO 2 R reduced MV in subjects preserving spontaneous breathing efforts with CO 2 overload. The addition of NaHCO 3 improved acidemia but did not change MV, whereas the addition of trometamol improved acidemia and reduced MV.