Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations between Forearm Bone Mineral Density and Anthropometry in Adult Japanese Men and Women.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Bone Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.21
Masahiro Ishizawa, Kazuya Fujihara, Junko Yachida, Izumi Ikeda, Takaaki Sato, Takaho Yamada, Ayako Kobayashi, Shiro Tanaka, Yoshimi Nakagawa, Takashi Matsuzaka, Hitoshi Shimano, Minoru Tashiro, Satoru Kodama, Kiminori Kato, Hirohito Sone
{"title":"Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations between Forearm Bone Mineral Density and Anthropometry in Adult Japanese Men and Women.","authors":"Masahiro Ishizawa, Kazuya Fujihara, Junko Yachida, Izumi Ikeda, Takaaki Sato, Takaho Yamada, Ayako Kobayashi, Shiro Tanaka, Yoshimi Nakagawa, Takashi Matsuzaka, Hitoshi Shimano, Minoru Tashiro, Satoru Kodama, Kiminori Kato, Hirohito Sone","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No consensus exists regarding which anthropometric measurements are related to bone mineral density (BMD), and this relationship may vary according to sex and age. A large Japanese cohort was analyzed to provide an understanding of the relationship between BMD and anthropometry while adjusting for known confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our cohort included 10,827 participants who underwent multiple medical checkups including distal forearm BMD scans. Participants were stratified into four groups according to age (≥50 years or <50 years) and sex. The BMD values were adjusted for confounding factors, after which single and partial correlation analyses were performed. The prevalence of osteopenia was plotted for each weight index (weight or body mass index [BMI]) class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-sectional studies revealed that weight was more favorably correlated than BMI in the older group (R=0.278 and 0.212 in men and R=0.304 and 0.220 in women, respectively), whereas weight and BMI were weakly correlated in the younger age groups. The prevalence of osteopenia exhibited a negative linear relationship with weight among older women ≥50 years of age, and an accelerated increase was observed with decreasing weight in older men weighing <50 kg and younger women weighing <60 kg. When weight was replaced with BMI, the prevalence was low in most subgroups classified by weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weight, rather than BMI, was the most important indicator of osteopenia but it might not be predictive of future bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"31 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No consensus exists regarding which anthropometric measurements are related to bone mineral density (BMD), and this relationship may vary according to sex and age. A large Japanese cohort was analyzed to provide an understanding of the relationship between BMD and anthropometry while adjusting for known confounding factors.

Methods: Our cohort included 10,827 participants who underwent multiple medical checkups including distal forearm BMD scans. Participants were stratified into four groups according to age (≥50 years or <50 years) and sex. The BMD values were adjusted for confounding factors, after which single and partial correlation analyses were performed. The prevalence of osteopenia was plotted for each weight index (weight or body mass index [BMI]) class.

Results: Cross-sectional studies revealed that weight was more favorably correlated than BMI in the older group (R=0.278 and 0.212 in men and R=0.304 and 0.220 in women, respectively), whereas weight and BMI were weakly correlated in the younger age groups. The prevalence of osteopenia exhibited a negative linear relationship with weight among older women ≥50 years of age, and an accelerated increase was observed with decreasing weight in older men weighing <50 kg and younger women weighing <60 kg. When weight was replaced with BMI, the prevalence was low in most subgroups classified by weight.

Conclusions: Weight, rather than BMI, was the most important indicator of osteopenia but it might not be predictive of future bone loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本成年男性和女性前臂骨矿物质密度与人体测量之间的横向和纵向关系
背景:关于哪些人体测量值与骨矿物质密度(BMD)相关,目前尚无共识,而且这种关系可能因性别和年龄而异。我们对一个大型日本队列进行了分析,以便在调整已知混杂因素的同时,了解骨密度与人体测量之间的关系:我们的队列包括 10,827 名参与者,他们接受了包括前臂远端 BMD 扫描在内的多项体检。根据年龄(≥50 岁或以上)将参与者分为四组:横断面研究显示,在老年组中,体重与 BMI 的相关性比 BMI 更好(男性分别为 R=0.278 和 0.212,女性分别为 R=0.304 和 0.220),而在年轻组中,体重与 BMI 的相关性较弱。在年龄≥50 岁的老年妇女中,骨质疏松症的发病率与体重呈负线性关系,而在老年男性中,随着体重的下降,骨质疏松症的发病率会加速上升:体重而非体重指数是骨质疏松最重要的指标,但它可能无法预测未来的骨质流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Journal of Bone Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Incretin-Based Therapies: A Promising Approach for Modulating Oxidative Stress and Insulin Resistance in Sarcopenia. Zoledronate Therapy in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Perspectives in Indonesia Tertiary Hospital. Age- and Sex-Related Volumetric Density Differences in Trabecular and Cortical Bone of the Proximal Femur in Healthy Population. Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1