Patient Perception on Osteoporosis in Korean Female Patients with Osteoporosis.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Bone Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.63
Kyung-Hag Lee, Guhyun Lee, Taehyun Lee, Dong-Won Byun, Yong-Chan Ha
{"title":"Patient Perception on Osteoporosis in Korean Female Patients with Osteoporosis.","authors":"Kyung-Hag Lee, Guhyun Lee, Taehyun Lee, Dong-Won Byun, Yong-Chan Ha","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient perception is a key element in improving compliance with medications for osteoporosis. This study evaluated the awareness, perception, sources of information, and knowledge of osteoporosis among Korean women with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire survey was conducted from July 22, 2021 to 13 August 2021. Patients who were followed up in endocrinology (Endo), orthopedic surgery (OS), and gynecology (GY) were recruited (N=40, 40, and 20 in each group). Patients were allocated according to their age, as follows: 15, 15, and 10 patients in their 60s, 70s, and 80s for Endo and OS, and 10 and 10 patients in their 60s and 70s for GY. The questionnaire was composed of the following topics: patient journey to the hospital, drug-related issues, communication with medical doctors, patient knowledge, and sources of information about osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of medical check-ups were the most common reason for patient visits to the hospital for an initial diagnosis of osteoporosis (61%). A knowledge gap regarding mortality, refracture, and drug-induced osteoporosis was observed. Doctors were the most preferred and trustful source of information, while health-related TV shows were the second most common source of information. Patients with OS reported lower perceived severity and higher drug discontinuation, along with a higher proportion of fractures, as the initial reasons for hospital visits for osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variations in perceptions according to the issue and group were identified. These should be considered during patient consultations to improve compliance with osteoporosis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"31 1","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2024.31.1.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient perception is a key element in improving compliance with medications for osteoporosis. This study evaluated the awareness, perception, sources of information, and knowledge of osteoporosis among Korean women with osteoporosis.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted from July 22, 2021 to 13 August 2021. Patients who were followed up in endocrinology (Endo), orthopedic surgery (OS), and gynecology (GY) were recruited (N=40, 40, and 20 in each group). Patients were allocated according to their age, as follows: 15, 15, and 10 patients in their 60s, 70s, and 80s for Endo and OS, and 10 and 10 patients in their 60s and 70s for GY. The questionnaire was composed of the following topics: patient journey to the hospital, drug-related issues, communication with medical doctors, patient knowledge, and sources of information about osteoporosis.

Results: The results of medical check-ups were the most common reason for patient visits to the hospital for an initial diagnosis of osteoporosis (61%). A knowledge gap regarding mortality, refracture, and drug-induced osteoporosis was observed. Doctors were the most preferred and trustful source of information, while health-related TV shows were the second most common source of information. Patients with OS reported lower perceived severity and higher drug discontinuation, along with a higher proportion of fractures, as the initial reasons for hospital visits for osteoporosis.

Conclusions: Variations in perceptions according to the issue and group were identified. These should be considered during patient consultations to improve compliance with osteoporosis treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国女性骨质疏松症患者对骨质疏松症的看法。
背景:患者的认知是提高骨质疏松症药物依从性的关键因素。本研究评估了韩国女性骨质疏松症患者对骨质疏松症的认识、感知、信息来源和知识:方法:2021 年 7 月 22 日至 2021 年 8 月 13 日进行了问卷调查。招募了在内分泌科(Endo)、骨外科(OS)和妇科(GY)接受随访的患者(每组分别为 40、40 和 20 人)。患者根据年龄分配如下:内科和外科分别有 15、15 和 10 名 60、70 和 80 岁的患者,妇科分别有 10 和 10 名 60 和 70 岁的患者。调查问卷由以下主题组成:患者到医院的旅程、与药物相关的问题、与医生的沟通、患者的知识以及骨质疏松症的信息来源:体检结果是患者因初步诊断为骨质疏松症而到医院就诊的最常见原因(61%)。在死亡率、骨折和药物引起的骨质疏松症方面存在知识差距。医生是最受欢迎和最值得信赖的信息来源,而与健康相关的电视节目则是第二常见的信息来源。OS患者认为骨质疏松症的严重程度较低、停药率较高、骨折比例较高是他们因骨质疏松症到医院就诊的最初原因:结论:根据问题和群体的不同,人们对骨质疏松症的认识也存在差异。结论:研究发现,不同问题和不同群体对骨质疏松症的认知存在差异,在为患者提供咨询时应考虑这些差异,以提高患者对骨质疏松症治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Journal of Bone Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Incretin-Based Therapies: A Promising Approach for Modulating Oxidative Stress and Insulin Resistance in Sarcopenia. Zoledronate Therapy in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Perspectives in Indonesia Tertiary Hospital. Age- and Sex-Related Volumetric Density Differences in Trabecular and Cortical Bone of the Proximal Femur in Healthy Population. Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1