Marco Metra, Crina-Ioana Radulescu, Angelica Cersosimo, Mauro Massussi, Andrea Laurito, Ovidiu Chioncel, Marianna Adamo
{"title":"Quality of life in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: tools and evidence.","authors":"Marco Metra, Crina-Ioana Radulescu, Angelica Cersosimo, Mauro Massussi, Andrea Laurito, Ovidiu Chioncel, Marianna Adamo","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic stenosis is the most prevalent valvular heart disease requiring intervention, especially in the elderly population. Surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are well established treatment options for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, as they provide a significant survival benefit. Aortic stenosis may have an important impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). However, advanced age, comorbidities and frailty may limit the beneficial effect of aortic stenosis interventions in terms of QoL. Current guidelines mention the importance of frailty and avoiding the futility of interventions, but lack specific indications about decision-making. Also, there are limited data on how to specifically assess QoL in aortic stenosis patients since the most used questionnaires are validated in different populations (i.e. heart failure). The aim of this review is to summarize all the available tools for QoL assessment in patients with aortic stenosis; to report current evidence on the impact of TAVI on QoL; and to discuss the role of frailty and comorbidities in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"259-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is the most prevalent valvular heart disease requiring intervention, especially in the elderly population. Surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are well established treatment options for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, as they provide a significant survival benefit. Aortic stenosis may have an important impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). However, advanced age, comorbidities and frailty may limit the beneficial effect of aortic stenosis interventions in terms of QoL. Current guidelines mention the importance of frailty and avoiding the futility of interventions, but lack specific indications about decision-making. Also, there are limited data on how to specifically assess QoL in aortic stenosis patients since the most used questionnaires are validated in different populations (i.e. heart failure). The aim of this review is to summarize all the available tools for QoL assessment in patients with aortic stenosis; to report current evidence on the impact of TAVI on QoL; and to discuss the role of frailty and comorbidities in this setting.
主动脉瓣狭窄是最常见的需要干预的瓣膜性心脏病,尤其是在老年人群中。手术主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是治疗有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成熟治疗方案,因为它们能显著提高患者的生存率。主动脉瓣狭窄可能会对患者的生活质量(QoL)产生重要影响。然而,高龄、合并症和体弱可能会限制主动脉瓣狭窄干预对生活质量的有益影响。目前的指南提到了体弱和避免干预无效的重要性,但缺乏关于决策的具体说明。此外,关于如何具体评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者 QoL 的数据也很有限,因为最常用的调查问卷已在不同人群(如心力衰竭)中得到验证。本综述旨在总结用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者 QoL 的所有可用工具;报告 TAVI 对 QoL 影响的现有证据;讨论虚弱和合并症在这种情况下的作用。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.