Effects of deep brain stimulation and verbal suggestions on pain in Parkinson's disease.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0126
Sophie Rosenkjær, Victor Schwartz Hvingelby, Erik Lisbjerg Johnsen, Mette Møller, Elisa Carlino, Troels Staehelin Jensen, Lene Vase
{"title":"Effects of deep brain stimulation and verbal suggestions on pain in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Sophie Rosenkjær, Victor Schwartz Hvingelby, Erik Lisbjerg Johnsen, Mette Møller, Elisa Carlino, Troels Staehelin Jensen, Lene Vase","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, verbal suggestions have been shown to modulate motor and clinical outcomes in treatment with subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). Furthermore, DBS may alleviate pain in PD. However, it is unknown if verbal suggestions influence DBS' effects on pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four people with PD and DBS had stimulation downregulated (80-60 to 20%) and upregulated (from 20-60 to 80%) in a blinded manner on randomized test days: (1) with negative and positive suggestions of pain for down- and upregulation, respectively, and (2) with no suggestions to effect (control). Effects of DBS and verbal suggestions were assessed on ongoing and evoked pain (hypertonic saline injections) via 0-10 numerical rating scales along with motor symptoms, expectations, and blinding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stimulation did not influence ongoing and evoked pain but influenced motor symptoms in the expected direction. Baseline and experimental pain measures showed no patterns in degree of pain. There was a trend toward negative suggestions increasing pain and positive suggestions decreasing pain. Results show significant differences in identical stimulation with negative vs positive suggestions (60% conditions AUC 38.75 vs 23.32, <i>t</i>(13) = 3.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Expectations to pain had small to moderate effects on evoked pain. Patients estimated stimulation level correctly within 10 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stimulation does not seem to influence ongoing and evoked pain, but verbal suggestions may influence pain levels. Patients appear to be unblinded to stimulation level which is an important consideration for future studies testing DBS in an attempted blind fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, verbal suggestions have been shown to modulate motor and clinical outcomes in treatment with subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). Furthermore, DBS may alleviate pain in PD. However, it is unknown if verbal suggestions influence DBS' effects on pain.

Methods: Twenty-four people with PD and DBS had stimulation downregulated (80-60 to 20%) and upregulated (from 20-60 to 80%) in a blinded manner on randomized test days: (1) with negative and positive suggestions of pain for down- and upregulation, respectively, and (2) with no suggestions to effect (control). Effects of DBS and verbal suggestions were assessed on ongoing and evoked pain (hypertonic saline injections) via 0-10 numerical rating scales along with motor symptoms, expectations, and blinding.

Results: Stimulation did not influence ongoing and evoked pain but influenced motor symptoms in the expected direction. Baseline and experimental pain measures showed no patterns in degree of pain. There was a trend toward negative suggestions increasing pain and positive suggestions decreasing pain. Results show significant differences in identical stimulation with negative vs positive suggestions (60% conditions AUC 38.75 vs 23.32, t(13) = 3.10, p < 0.001). Expectations to pain had small to moderate effects on evoked pain. Patients estimated stimulation level correctly within 10 points.

Conclusion: Stimulation does not seem to influence ongoing and evoked pain, but verbal suggestions may influence pain levels. Patients appear to be unblinded to stimulation level which is an important consideration for future studies testing DBS in an attempted blind fashion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑深部刺激和口头建议对帕金森病患者疼痛的影响。
背景和目的:在对帕金森病(PD)患者进行眼下丘脑下深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗时,口头建议已被证明可调节运动和临床疗效。此外,DBS 可减轻帕金森病患者的疼痛。然而,口头建议是否会影响 DBS 对疼痛的影响尚不得而知:24名患有帕金森病和DBS的患者在随机测试日以盲法对刺激进行了下调(80-60%至20%)和上调(从20-60%至80%):(1)下调和上调时分别有消极和积极的疼痛暗示,(2)没有暗示效果(对照组)。通过0-10数字评分量表以及运动症状、预期和盲法评估DBS和口头建议对持续疼痛和诱发疼痛(高渗盐水注射)的影响:结果:刺激对持续疼痛和诱发疼痛没有影响,但对运动症状有预期的影响。基线和实验性疼痛测量结果显示,疼痛程度没有规律可循。消极暗示会增加疼痛,而积极暗示会减少疼痛。结果显示,负面建议与正面建议对相同刺激的影响存在明显差异(60% 条件下 AUC 为 38.75 vs 23.32,t(13) = 3.10,p < 0.001)。对疼痛的预期对诱发疼痛有轻微到中等程度的影响。患者对刺激水平的正确估计在 10 分以内:刺激似乎不会影响持续疼痛和诱发疼痛,但口头建议可能会影响疼痛程度。患者似乎对刺激水平不设盲区,这对未来尝试盲法测试 DBS 的研究来说是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Neck and shoulder pain and inflammatory biomarkers in plasma among forklift truck operators - A case-control study. A positive scratch collapse test in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome indicates its neuropathic character. Real-world evidence evaluation on consumer experience and prescription journey of diclofenac gel in Sweden. Differences in risk factors for flare-ups in patients with lumbar radicular pain may depend on the definition of flare. The "future" pain clinician: Competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1