Tackling social inequalities in health: Assessing contexts for implementing integrated health access for people with severe mental illness

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1002/hpm.3798
Sofie Buch Mejsner, Mickael Bech, Michael Fehsenfeld, Luna Lundberg, Caroline Louise Westergaard, Kathrine Vixø, Viola Burau
{"title":"Tackling social inequalities in health: Assessing contexts for implementing integrated health access for people with severe mental illness","authors":"Sofie Buch Mejsner,&nbsp;Mickael Bech,&nbsp;Michael Fehsenfeld,&nbsp;Luna Lundberg,&nbsp;Caroline Louise Westergaard,&nbsp;Kathrine Vixø,&nbsp;Viola Burau","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social inequalities in health are a complex problem that often emerge at the interfaces between different sectors, such as health and social care, and the corresponding transitions between different provider organisations. Vulnerable people are typically in greater need of accessing different sectors of the health system and therefore often experience lack of coherence in their treatment pathway. We aimed to examine the contexts of health systems that influence initiatives concerned with integrated health access. We used the theory of Organizational Fields to study the contexts for implementing Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) in Central Denmark Region and three municipalities in the region. We collected 33 documents and conducted six qualitative interviews with professionals involved in FACT to understand the contexts of implementing integrated health access. We found that contexts for implementing FACT are highly complex, as they are divided between health and social care (horizontal complexity) and between national and the sub-national levels of the region and the municipalities (vertical complexity). This leads to conflicting demands on implementation. Local contexts of collaboration may offer a lever to handle these demands, but these are likely to vary. Analysis of how complex health system contexts influence implementation is important to understand how changes might become sustainable and help to tackle social inequalities in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3798","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social inequalities in health are a complex problem that often emerge at the interfaces between different sectors, such as health and social care, and the corresponding transitions between different provider organisations. Vulnerable people are typically in greater need of accessing different sectors of the health system and therefore often experience lack of coherence in their treatment pathway. We aimed to examine the contexts of health systems that influence initiatives concerned with integrated health access. We used the theory of Organizational Fields to study the contexts for implementing Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) in Central Denmark Region and three municipalities in the region. We collected 33 documents and conducted six qualitative interviews with professionals involved in FACT to understand the contexts of implementing integrated health access. We found that contexts for implementing FACT are highly complex, as they are divided between health and social care (horizontal complexity) and between national and the sub-national levels of the region and the municipalities (vertical complexity). This leads to conflicting demands on implementation. Local contexts of collaboration may offer a lever to handle these demands, but these are likely to vary. Analysis of how complex health system contexts influence implementation is important to understand how changes might become sustainable and help to tackle social inequalities in health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对健康方面的社会不平等:评估为重性精神病患者提供综合医疗服务的背景。
健康方面的社会不平等是一个复杂的问题,往往出现在不同部门(如医疗和社会护理)之间的交接点,以及不同提供机构之间的相应过渡。弱势群体通常更需要获得医疗系统不同部门的服务,因此他们的治疗路径往往缺乏连贯性。我们的目标是研究影响综合医疗服务相关举措的医疗系统背景。我们运用组织领域理论研究了丹麦中部大区和该大区三个城市实施灵活自主社区治疗(FACT)的背景。我们收集了 33 份文件,并对参与 FACT 的专业人员进行了六次定性访谈,以了解实施综合医疗服务的背景。我们发现,实施 FACT 的背景非常复杂,因为它们被划分为医疗和社会医疗(横向复杂性),以及国家和次国家层面的地区和市镇(纵向复杂性)。这导致对实施工作的要求相互冲突。当地的合作环境可能为处理这些需求提供了一个杠杆,但这些环境可能各不相同。分析复杂的卫生系统背景如何影响实施工作,对于了解如何使变革具有可持续性并帮助解决卫生领域的社会不平等问题非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary private health insurance and cancer screening utilisation in Europe. Issue Information Reassessing physician interactions with pharmaceutical companies: A response to Murayama et al. and analysis of survey discrepancies. The experiences of minority language users in health and social care research: A systematic review. Steering them softly with a quality label? A case study analysis of a patient channelling strategy without financial incentives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1