Michael T Lawless, Matthew Tieu, Mandy M Archibald, Maria Alejandra Pinero De Plaza, Alison L Kitson
{"title":"From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration.","authors":"Michael T Lawless, Matthew Tieu, Mandy M Archibald, Maria Alejandra Pinero De Plaza, Alison L Kitson","doi":"10.1177/10497323241235882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an increasing emphasis on transdisciplinary research to address the complex challenges faced by health systems. However, research has not adequately explored how members of transdisciplinary research teams perceive, understand, and promote transdisciplinary collaboration. As such, there is a need to investigate collaborative behaviors, knowledge, and the impacts of transdisciplinary research. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal realist evaluation of transdisciplinary collaboration within a 5-year National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Center of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research. The current study aimed to explore researchers' perceptions and promotion of transdisciplinary research specifically within the context of frailty research using qualitative methods. Participants described transdisciplinary research as a collaborative and integrative approach that involves individuals from various disciplines working together to tackle complex research problems. However, participants often used terms like interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary interchangeably, indicating that a shared understanding of transdisciplinary research is needed. Barriers to transdisciplinary collaboration included time constraints, geographical distance, and entrenched collaboration patterns. To overcome these challenges, participants suggested implementing strategies such as creating a shared vision and goals, establishing appropriate collaboration systems and structures, and role modeling collaborative behaviors, values, and attitudes. Our findings underscore the need for practical knowledge in developing transdisciplinary collaboration and leadership skills across different career stages. In the absence of formal training, sustained and immersive programs that connect researchers with peers, educators, and role models from various disciplines and provide experiential learning opportunities, may be valuable in fostering successful transdisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"3-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241235882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is an increasing emphasis on transdisciplinary research to address the complex challenges faced by health systems. However, research has not adequately explored how members of transdisciplinary research teams perceive, understand, and promote transdisciplinary collaboration. As such, there is a need to investigate collaborative behaviors, knowledge, and the impacts of transdisciplinary research. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal realist evaluation of transdisciplinary collaboration within a 5-year National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Center of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research. The current study aimed to explore researchers' perceptions and promotion of transdisciplinary research specifically within the context of frailty research using qualitative methods. Participants described transdisciplinary research as a collaborative and integrative approach that involves individuals from various disciplines working together to tackle complex research problems. However, participants often used terms like interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary interchangeably, indicating that a shared understanding of transdisciplinary research is needed. Barriers to transdisciplinary collaboration included time constraints, geographical distance, and entrenched collaboration patterns. To overcome these challenges, participants suggested implementing strategies such as creating a shared vision and goals, establishing appropriate collaboration systems and structures, and role modeling collaborative behaviors, values, and attitudes. Our findings underscore the need for practical knowledge in developing transdisciplinary collaboration and leadership skills across different career stages. In the absence of formal training, sustained and immersive programs that connect researchers with peers, educators, and role models from various disciplines and provide experiential learning opportunities, may be valuable in fostering successful transdisciplinary collaboration.
跨学科研究越来越受到重视,以应对卫生系统面临的复杂挑战。然而,对于跨学科研究团队成员如何看待、理解和促进跨学科合作的研究还不够充分。因此,有必要调查跨学科研究的合作行为、知识和影响。为了填补这一空白,我们在国家健康与医学研究委员会资助的跨学科虚弱研究卓越中心(Center of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research)开展了一项为期 5 年的跨学科合作纵向现实主义评估。本研究旨在采用定性方法探讨研究人员对跨学科研究的看法和促进作用,特别是在虚弱研究的背景下。参与者将跨学科研究描述为一种合作和综合的方法,它涉及来自不同学科的个人共同解决复杂的研究问题。不过,与会者经常交替使用跨学科和多学科等术语,这表明需要对跨学科研究有一个共同的理解。跨学科合作的障碍包括时间限制、地理距离和根深蒂固的合作模式。为了克服这些挑战,与会者建议实施一些策略,如建立共同的愿景和目标,建立适当的合作体系和结构,以及树立合作行为、价值观和态度的榜样。我们的研究结果表明,在不同职业阶段培养跨学科合作和领导技能需要实用知识。在缺乏正规培训的情况下,将研究人员与来自不同学科的同行、教育者和榜样联系起来并提供体验式学习机会的持续性沉浸式计划,可能对培养成功的跨学科合作很有价值。
期刊介绍:
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.