Comparative transcriptome analysis between rhesus macaques ( Macaca mulatta) and crab-eating macaques ( M. fascicularis).

IF 4 1区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Zoological Research Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.322
Yu-Xiang Mao, Yamei Li, Zikun Yang, Ning Xu, Shilong Zhang, Xuankai Wang, Xiangyu Yang, Qiang Sun, Yafei Mao
{"title":"Comparative transcriptome analysis between rhesus macaques ( <i>Macaca mulatta</i>) and crab-eating macaques ( <i>M. fascicularis</i>).","authors":"Yu-Xiang Mao, Yamei Li, Zikun Yang, Ning Xu, Shilong Zhang, Xuankai Wang, Xiangyu Yang, Qiang Sun, Yafei Mao","doi":"10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding gene expression variations between species is pivotal for deciphering the evolutionary diversity in phenotypes. Rhesus macaques ( <i>Macaca mulatta</i>, MMU) and crab-eating macaques ( <i>M. fascicularis</i>, MFA) serve as crucial nonhuman primate biomedical models with different phenotypes. To date, however, large-scale comparative transcriptome research between these two species has not yet been fully explored. Here, we conducted systematic comparisons utilizing newly sequenced RNA-seq data from 84 samples (41 MFA samples and 43 MMU samples) encompassing 14 common tissues. Our findings revealed a small fraction of genes (3.7%) with differential expression between the two species, as well as 36.5% of genes with tissue-specific expression in both macaques. Comparison of gene expression between macaques and humans indicated that 22.6% of orthologous genes displayed differential expression in at least two tissues. Moreover, 19.41% of genes that overlapped with macaque-specific structural variants showed differential expression between humans and macaques. Of these, the <i>FAM220A</i> gene exhibited elevated expression in humans compared to macaques due to lineage-specific duplication. In summary, this study presents a large-scale transcriptomic comparison between MMU and MFA and between macaques and humans. The discovery of gene expression variations not only enhances the biomedical utility of macaque models but also contributes to the wider field of primate genomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48636,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Research","volume":"45 2","pages":"299-310"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding gene expression variations between species is pivotal for deciphering the evolutionary diversity in phenotypes. Rhesus macaques ( Macaca mulatta, MMU) and crab-eating macaques ( M. fascicularis, MFA) serve as crucial nonhuman primate biomedical models with different phenotypes. To date, however, large-scale comparative transcriptome research between these two species has not yet been fully explored. Here, we conducted systematic comparisons utilizing newly sequenced RNA-seq data from 84 samples (41 MFA samples and 43 MMU samples) encompassing 14 common tissues. Our findings revealed a small fraction of genes (3.7%) with differential expression between the two species, as well as 36.5% of genes with tissue-specific expression in both macaques. Comparison of gene expression between macaques and humans indicated that 22.6% of orthologous genes displayed differential expression in at least two tissues. Moreover, 19.41% of genes that overlapped with macaque-specific structural variants showed differential expression between humans and macaques. Of these, the FAM220A gene exhibited elevated expression in humans compared to macaques due to lineage-specific duplication. In summary, this study presents a large-scale transcriptomic comparison between MMU and MFA and between macaques and humans. The discovery of gene expression variations not only enhances the biomedical utility of macaque models but also contributes to the wider field of primate genomics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猕猴(Macaca mulatta)与食蟹猕猴(M. fascicularis)的转录组比较分析。
了解物种间的基因表达变异对于解读表型的进化多样性至关重要。猕猴(Macaca mulatta,MMU)和食蟹猕猴(M. fascicularis,MFA)是具有不同表型的重要非人灵长类生物医学模型。然而,迄今为止,这两个物种之间的大规模转录组比较研究尚未得到充分探索。在这里,我们利用最新测序的 84 个样本(41 个 MFA 样本和 43 个 MMU 样本)的 RNA-seq 数据进行了系统比较,这些样本包括 14 种常见组织。我们的研究结果表明,有一小部分基因(3.7%)在两种猕猴中存在表达差异,还有 36.5% 的基因在两种猕猴中具有组织特异性表达。猕猴与人类基因表达的比较表明,22.6%的同源基因在至少两个组织中表现出差异表达。此外,19.41%与猕猴特异性结构变异重叠的基因在人类和猕猴之间表现出差异表达。其中,FAM220A 基因在人类中的表达高于猕猴,这是由于系特异性复制所致。总之,本研究对 MMU 和 MFA 以及猕猴和人类进行了大规模转录组学比较。基因表达变异的发现不仅提高了猕猴模型的生物医学实用性,也为灵长类动物基因组学这一更广阔的领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zoological Research
Zoological Research Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
1937
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1980, Zoological Research (ZR) is a bimonthly publication produced by Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the China Zoological Society. It publishes peer-reviewed original research article/review/report/note/letter to the editor/editorial in English on Primates and Animal Models, Conservation and Utilization of Animal Resources, and Animal Diversity and Evolution.
期刊最新文献
IDH2 and GLUD1 depletion arrests embryonic development through an H4K20me3 epigenetic barrier in porcine parthenogenetic embryos. Pancreatic agenesis and altered m6A methylation in the pancreas of PDX1-mutant cynomolgus macaques. Convergent evolution in high-altitude and marine mammals: Molecular adaptations to pulmonary fibrosis and hypoxia. Maternal sleep deprivation disrupts glutamate metabolism in offspring rats. Nature's disguise: Empirical demonstration of dead-leaf masquerade in Kallima butterflies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1