Stigma associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Sri Lanka: development of a conceptual framework.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Health Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1093/inthealth/ihae021
Hasara Nuwangi, Lisa Dikomitis, Kosala G Weerakoon, Chandani Liyanage, Thilini C Agampodi, Suneth B Agampodi
{"title":"Stigma associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Sri Lanka: development of a conceptual framework.","authors":"Hasara Nuwangi, Lisa Dikomitis, Kosala G Weerakoon, Chandani Liyanage, Thilini C Agampodi, Suneth B Agampodi","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited knowledge about the stigma associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Sri Lanka. To ensure that leishmaniasis researchers focus on CL-associated stigma, we provide an evidence-based framework that can be used in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review on CL-associated stigma using international evidence and carried out a multimethod qualitative study in the Anuradhapura district in Sri Lanka. Based on that, we identified manifestations of stigma, drivers and facilitators that we synthesised to develop a conceptual framework on CL-associated stigma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our framework consists of drivers, facilitators and self-stigma experienced by people with CL. Stigma drivers included fear, misbeliefs and misconceptions about CL; the belief that wounds are disfiguring; the treatment burden and implied blame. Facilitators that reduced stigma included knowledge of the curability of CL and awareness that CL is not contagious. The nature of social interactions in rural communities enhanced stigma formation. We identified various enacted, felt and internalised stigma experiences of people with CL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a conceptual framework of the stigma associated with CL that can be used to develop targeted interventions to increase CL awareness, address stigma and improve the quality of life for CL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihae021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited knowledge about the stigma associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Sri Lanka. To ensure that leishmaniasis researchers focus on CL-associated stigma, we provide an evidence-based framework that can be used in future research.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review on CL-associated stigma using international evidence and carried out a multimethod qualitative study in the Anuradhapura district in Sri Lanka. Based on that, we identified manifestations of stigma, drivers and facilitators that we synthesised to develop a conceptual framework on CL-associated stigma.

Results: Our framework consists of drivers, facilitators and self-stigma experienced by people with CL. Stigma drivers included fear, misbeliefs and misconceptions about CL; the belief that wounds are disfiguring; the treatment burden and implied blame. Facilitators that reduced stigma included knowledge of the curability of CL and awareness that CL is not contagious. The nature of social interactions in rural communities enhanced stigma formation. We identified various enacted, felt and internalised stigma experiences of people with CL.

Conclusions: We developed a conceptual framework of the stigma associated with CL that can be used to develop targeted interventions to increase CL awareness, address stigma and improve the quality of life for CL patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡农村地区与皮肤利什曼病相关的耻辱感:概念框架的发展。
背景:在斯里兰卡,人们对与皮肤利什曼病(CL)相关的耻辱感了解有限。为确保利什曼病研究人员关注与利什曼病相关的耻辱感,我们提供了一个基于证据的框架,可用于未来的研究:方法:我们利用国际证据对与利什曼病相关的成见进行了系统回顾,并在斯里兰卡阿努拉德普勒地区开展了一项多方法定性研究。在此基础上,我们确定了成见的表现形式、驱动因素和促进因素,并对其进行了综合,从而建立了一个与传播疾病相关的成见概念框架:结果:我们的框架由慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者所经历的成见驱动因素、成见促进因素和自我成见组成。污名化的驱动因素包括对 CL 的恐惧、误解和错误认识;认为伤口会毁容;治疗负担和隐含的指责。减少污名化的促进因素包括对巨细胞病毒可治愈性的了解以及对巨细胞病毒不会传染的认识。农村社区的社会交往性质加剧了成见的形成。我们确定了慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的各种形成、感受和内化成见的经历:我们建立了一个与传染性单核细胞增多症相关的成见概念框架,可用于制定有针对性的干预措施,以提高对传染性单核细胞增多症的认识、消除成见并改善传染性单核细胞增多症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life and associated factors among primary caregivers of children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders attending public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. COVID-19 vaccine wastage in private and public healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Community health workers to reduce unmet surgical needs in an urban slum in India: an implementation study. Persons 'never treated' in mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis: identifying programmatic and research needs from a series of research review meetings 2020-2021. Global knowledge and attitudes towards mpox (monkeypox) among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1