Government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: good practices and lessons for future preparedness.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Research and Policy Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y
Shu Chen, Lei Guo, Yewei Xie, Di Dong, Rana Saber, Mohammed Alluhidan, Adwa Alamri, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Nahar Alazemi, Yahya M Al-Farsi, Yazid A Al Ohaly, Yi Zhang, Severin Rakic, Mariam Hamza, Christopher H Herbst, Shenglan Tang
{"title":"Government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: good practices and lessons for future preparedness.","authors":"Shu Chen, Lei Guo, Yewei Xie, Di Dong, Rana Saber, Mohammed Alluhidan, Adwa Alamri, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Nahar Alazemi, Yahya M Al-Farsi, Yazid A Al Ohaly, Yi Zhang, Severin Rakic, Mariam Hamza, Christopher H Herbst, Shenglan Tang","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically threatened the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries which have a large proportion of foreign workers. The governments of GCC countries have proactively implemented a comprehensive set of policy measures, and up to our knowledge, a systematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative evidence on the government response is still lacking. We summarized the GCC countries' government response and quantitatively measured that response using four indexes-the Government Response Index, the Stringency Index, the Vaccine Index, and the Initial Response Index, to analyse their response for future pandemic preparedness. Overall, the government response of all the GCC countries to the COVID-19 pandemic has been comprehensive, stringent, and timely. Notably, the GCC countries have implemented comprehensive vaccine policies. In addition, they have worked actively to protect foreign workers to improve their access to health services and secure their essential living conditions, regardless of their immigrant status. All the GCC countries dynamically adjusted their response to the evolving COVID-19 epidemiological burden and started to relax the stringency of the control policies after the Omicron wave, though the governments had different response magnitudes as measured by the four indexes. These findings have provided several important lessons for future pandemic response and preparedness for countries with similar economic, demographic, and health contexts in (1) prompt actions of containment and closure policies with dynamic adjusting, (2) strengthening health system policies, (3) comprehensive vaccination policies with universal access, (4) equitable and free access to testing, diagnosis, and treatment for all, and (5) strengthening the resilience of health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10941437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00349-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically threatened the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries which have a large proportion of foreign workers. The governments of GCC countries have proactively implemented a comprehensive set of policy measures, and up to our knowledge, a systematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative evidence on the government response is still lacking. We summarized the GCC countries' government response and quantitatively measured that response using four indexes-the Government Response Index, the Stringency Index, the Vaccine Index, and the Initial Response Index, to analyse their response for future pandemic preparedness. Overall, the government response of all the GCC countries to the COVID-19 pandemic has been comprehensive, stringent, and timely. Notably, the GCC countries have implemented comprehensive vaccine policies. In addition, they have worked actively to protect foreign workers to improve their access to health services and secure their essential living conditions, regardless of their immigrant status. All the GCC countries dynamically adjusted their response to the evolving COVID-19 epidemiological burden and started to relax the stringency of the control policies after the Omicron wave, though the governments had different response magnitudes as measured by the four indexes. These findings have provided several important lessons for future pandemic response and preparedness for countries with similar economic, demographic, and health contexts in (1) prompt actions of containment and closure policies with dynamic adjusting, (2) strengthening health system policies, (3) comprehensive vaccination policies with universal access, (4) equitable and free access to testing, diagnosis, and treatment for all, and (5) strengthening the resilience of health systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海湾合作委员会国家政府应对 COVID-19 大流行的措施:良好做法和未来准备工作的经验教训。
COVID-19 大流行已严重威胁到拥有大量外籍工人的海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家。海湾合作委员会国家的政府积极实施了一整套政策措施,但据我们所知,目前仍缺乏对政府应对措施的定性和定量证据进行系统分析。我们总结了海合会国家政府的应对措施,并使用四个指数--政府应对指数、严格指数、疫苗指数和初始应对指数--对政府的应对措施进行了定量衡量,以分析其应对措施对未来大流行病的准备情况。总体而言,所有海合会国家政府对 COVID-19 大流行的应对措施都是全面、严格和及时的。值得注意的是,海合会国家实施了全面的疫苗政策。此外,它们还积极保护外籍工人,改善他们获得医疗服务的机会,并确保他们的基本生活条件,无论其移民身份如何。所有海合会国家都根据不断变化的 COVID-19 流行病学负担动态调整了应对措施,并在 Omicron 波后开始放宽控制政策的严格程度,尽管根据四项指数衡量,各国政府的应对措施幅度不同。这些发现为具有类似经济、人口和卫生背景的国家在未来应对和防备大流行病提供了几条重要经验:(1) 迅速采取行动,动态调整遏制和封锁政策;(2) 加强卫生系统政策;(3) 普及全面的疫苗接种政策;(4) 让所有人都能公平、免费地获得检测、诊断和治疗;(5) 加强卫生系统的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the implementation gap for Trastuzumab's journey from health insurance to patient access: a preliminary study in a hospital in China. How the U.S. presidential election impacts global health: governance, funding, and beyond. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare facility utilization by non-Ebola patients during the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Impact of access to coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention on in-hospital and five-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study in Thailand. Prevalence of potential drug‒drug interactions and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1