House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice.

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-02-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1355324
Žana Tempels-Pavlica, Mark C J Aarts, Paco M J Welsing, Akke-Nynke van der Meer, Leonard P van der Zwan, Elena Uss, André C Knulst
{"title":"House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice.","authors":"Žana Tempels-Pavlica, Mark C J Aarts, Paco M J Welsing, Akke-Nynke van der Meer, Leonard P van der Zwan, Elena Uss, André C Knulst","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1355324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Half (49%) of clinically diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) patients are sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). If allergen avoidance and symptomatic medication fail, allergen immunotherapy may be indicated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated safety and tolerability of HDM-sublingual immunotherapy by HDM-SLIT tablets in Dutch daily clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Daily intake of 12 SQ-HDM SLIT-tablet was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (EUPAS43753). It comprised 4 consultations in 1 year. Data on safety, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, symptomatic medication, compliance, and clinical effectiveness (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CARAT) were collected. Descriptive and longitudinal regression data analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adult patients (<i>n</i> = 415), mean (SD) age 36.6 (12.2) years, 61.4% female and 36% asthmatic were included. The preponderance (65.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs). These, mostly mild (67%), AEs comprised: oral allergic reactions (58.6%), respiratory (12.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (9.4%). Sixty (14.5%) patients stopped due to AEs and 76 (18.3%) for non-AE reasons. CARAT scores improved clinically significant by 6 points and symptomatic medication use decreased from 96.1% to 77.4%. Most patients (74.5%) tolerated the treatment and were compliant (>86.5%). The majority of patients (62.4%) and investigators (69.4%) were satisfied with treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HDM SLIT-tablet is a safe and well-tolerated AR treatment. AEs occur often but are mostly mild and decreasing during the first year. CARAT scores improved and symptomatic medication use decreased suggesting better control of AR with treatment. Compliance, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction are good. However, patient follow-up and compliance remain important points of attention when initiating treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1355324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Half (49%) of clinically diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) patients are sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). If allergen avoidance and symptomatic medication fail, allergen immunotherapy may be indicated.

Objective: We investigated safety and tolerability of HDM-sublingual immunotherapy by HDM-SLIT tablets in Dutch daily clinical practice.

Methods: Daily intake of 12 SQ-HDM SLIT-tablet was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (EUPAS43753). It comprised 4 consultations in 1 year. Data on safety, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, symptomatic medication, compliance, and clinical effectiveness (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CARAT) were collected. Descriptive and longitudinal regression data analysis were performed.

Results: Adult patients (n = 415), mean (SD) age 36.6 (12.2) years, 61.4% female and 36% asthmatic were included. The preponderance (65.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs). These, mostly mild (67%), AEs comprised: oral allergic reactions (58.6%), respiratory (12.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (9.4%). Sixty (14.5%) patients stopped due to AEs and 76 (18.3%) for non-AE reasons. CARAT scores improved clinically significant by 6 points and symptomatic medication use decreased from 96.1% to 77.4%. Most patients (74.5%) tolerated the treatment and were compliant (>86.5%). The majority of patients (62.4%) and investigators (69.4%) were satisfied with treatment.

Conclusions: HDM SLIT-tablet is a safe and well-tolerated AR treatment. AEs occur often but are mostly mild and decreasing during the first year. CARAT scores improved and symptomatic medication use decreased suggesting better control of AR with treatment. Compliance, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction are good. However, patient follow-up and compliance remain important points of attention when initiating treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在荷兰的临床实践中,屋尘螨舌下过敏原免疫疗法片剂安全且耐受性良好。
背景:在临床诊断的过敏性鼻炎(AR)患者中,有一半(49%)对屋尘螨(HDM)过敏。如果避开过敏原和对症药物治疗无效,可能需要进行过敏原免疫治疗:我们调查了荷兰日常临床实践中使用 HDM-SLIT 片剂进行 HDM 舌下免疫疗法的安全性和耐受性:在一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究(EUPAS43753)中,对每天摄入 12 片 SQ-HDM SLIT 片剂进行了调查。该研究为期一年,共进行了 4 次问诊。研究收集了有关安全性、耐受性、治疗满意度、对症用药、依从性和临床效果(过敏性鼻炎和哮喘控制测试;CARAT)的数据。对数据进行了描述性分析和纵向回归分析:成年患者(n = 415),平均(标清)年龄为 36.6(12.2)岁,61.4% 为女性,36% 为哮喘患者。大多数患者(65.1%)出现了不良反应(AEs)。这些不良反应大多较轻(67%),包括:口腔过敏反应(58.6%)、呼吸道症状(12.4%)和胃肠道症状(9.4%)。有 60 名患者(14.5%)因过敏反应而停药,76 名患者(18.3%)因非过敏反应原因而停药。CARAT 评分在临床上显著提高了 6 分,无症状药物使用率从 96.1% 降至 77.4%。大多数患者(74.5%)都能耐受治疗,并遵从医嘱(>86.5%)。大多数患者(62.4%)和调查人员(69.4%)对治疗表示满意:结论:HDM SLIT片剂是一种安全且耐受性良好的AR治疗药物。结论:HDM SLIT 片剂是一种安全且耐受性良好的 AR 治疗药物,其不良反应经常发生,但大多较轻,且在第一年内逐渐减少。CARAT 评分有所提高,症状性用药减少,这表明通过治疗可以更好地控制 AR。依从性、耐受性和治疗满意度都很好。不过,在开始治疗时,患者的随访和依从性仍是重要的注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early life exposures of childhood asthma and allergies-an epidemiologic perspective. Editorial: The safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of allergen-specific oral immunotherapy. A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy in patients treated with Alternaria alternata and Dermatophagoides farinae immunotherapy. The effect of the housing crisis in the Alabama Black Belt on respiratory health. Changes in epinephrine dispensings and allergy hospitalisations in Sweden in the years following the removal of autoinjector co-payments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1