Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) Pub Date : 2002-08-31
Sam Gibbs, Ian Harvey, Jane Sterling, Rosemary Stark
{"title":"Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review.","authors":"Sam Gibbs, Ian Harvey, Jane Sterling, Rosemary Stark","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the evidence for the efficacy of local treatments for cutaneous warts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Total clearance of warts and adverse effects such as irritation, pain, and blistering.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomised controlled trials of any local treatment for uncomplicated cutaneous warts. All published and unpublished material was considered, with no restriction on date or language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 included trials provided generally weak evidence because of poor methods and reporting. The best evidence was for topical treatments containing salicylic acid. Data pooled from six placebo controlled trials showed a cure rate of 75% (144 of 191) in cases compared with 48% (89 of 185) in controls (odds ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 2.40 to 6.36). Some evidence for the efficacy of contact immunotherapy was provided by two small trials comparing dinitrochlorobenzene with placebo. Evidence for the efficacy of cryotherapy was limited. No consistent evidence was found for the efficacy of intralesional bleomycin, and only limited evidence was found for the efficacy of topical fluorouracil, intralesional interferons, photodynamic therapy, and pulsed dye laser.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reviewed trials of local treatments for cutaneous warts were highly variable in methods and quality, and there was a paucity of evidence from randomised, placebo controlled trials on which to base the rational use of the treatments. There is good evidence that topical treatments containing salicylic acid have a therapeutic effect and some evidence for the efficacy of dinitrochlorobenzene. Less evidence was found for the efficacy of all the other treatments reviewed, including cryotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93911,"journal":{"name":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)","volume":"325 7362","pages":"461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC119440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the evidence for the efficacy of local treatments for cutaneous warts.

Methods: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Main outcomes measures: Total clearance of warts and adverse effects such as irritation, pain, and blistering.

Study selection: Randomised controlled trials of any local treatment for uncomplicated cutaneous warts. All published and unpublished material was considered, with no restriction on date or language.

Results: 50 included trials provided generally weak evidence because of poor methods and reporting. The best evidence was for topical treatments containing salicylic acid. Data pooled from six placebo controlled trials showed a cure rate of 75% (144 of 191) in cases compared with 48% (89 of 185) in controls (odds ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 2.40 to 6.36). Some evidence for the efficacy of contact immunotherapy was provided by two small trials comparing dinitrochlorobenzene with placebo. Evidence for the efficacy of cryotherapy was limited. No consistent evidence was found for the efficacy of intralesional bleomycin, and only limited evidence was found for the efficacy of topical fluorouracil, intralesional interferons, photodynamic therapy, and pulsed dye laser.

Conclusions: Reviewed trials of local treatments for cutaneous warts were highly variable in methods and quality, and there was a paucity of evidence from randomised, placebo controlled trials on which to base the rational use of the treatments. There is good evidence that topical treatments containing salicylic acid have a therapeutic effect and some evidence for the efficacy of dinitrochlorobenzene. Less evidence was found for the efficacy of all the other treatments reviewed, including cryotherapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤疣的局部治疗:系统综述。
目的:评估皮肤疣局部治疗效果的证据:评估皮肤疣局部治疗的疗效证据:方法:对随机对照试验进行系统回顾:研究选择:研究选择:针对无并发症皮肤疣的任何局部治疗的随机对照试验。所有已发表和未发表的材料均在考虑之列,日期和语言不限:结果:纳入的 50 项试验由于方法和报告不完善,提供的证据普遍较弱。最好的证据是含水杨酸的局部治疗。六项安慰剂对照试验的汇总数据显示,病例的治愈率为 75%(191 例中的 144 例),而对照组的治愈率为 48%(185 例中的 89 例)(几率比 3.91,95% 置信区间 2.40 至 6.36)。两项比较二硝基氯苯和安慰剂的小型试验为接触免疫疗法的疗效提供了一些证据。冷冻疗法疗效的证据有限。关于局部注射博莱霉素的疗效,没有发现一致的证据;关于局部氟尿嘧啶、局部注射干扰素、光动力疗法和脉冲染料激光的疗效,也只发现了有限的证据:经审查的皮肤疣局部治疗试验在方法和质量上存在很大差异,而且缺乏随机安慰剂对照试验的证据,因此无法作为合理使用治疗方法的依据。有充分证据表明,含水杨酸的局部治疗具有治疗效果,也有一些证据表明二硝基氯苯具有疗效。而包括冷冻疗法在内的所有其他疗法的疗效证据较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expression of concern about content of which Dr Paul McCrory is a single author. "Toxic debate" over treatment for gender dysphoria in UK leaves judges without expert medical witnesses. Antimicrobial resistance: UK's five year plan aims to reduce antibiotic use by 5% by 2029. Expression of concern about content of which Dr Paul McCrory is a single author. Gaza: Israel begins Rafah attack despite WHO warning of "bloodbath".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1