A national cross-sectional survey on time-trends for endovascular repair of genetically-triggered aortic disease and connective tissue disorders over two decades.

Mario D'Oria, Sandro Lepidi, Rocco Giudice, Jacob Budtz-Lilly, Ciro Ferrer
{"title":"A national cross-sectional survey on time-trends for endovascular repair of genetically-triggered aortic disease and connective tissue disorders over two decades.","authors":"Mario D'Oria, Sandro Lepidi, Rocco Giudice, Jacob Budtz-Lilly, Ciro Ferrer","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12941-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>By this survey, we aim to gain national-based information regarding trends in endovascular repair (ER) for the treatment of aortic disease in patients with genetically-triggered aortic disease (GTAD) and connective tissue disorder (CTD) over the last two decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Italian vascular surgery centers (N.=80) were invited to participate in an anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey on ER for GTAD/CTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 29 institutions completed the survey, thereby yielding a 36% response rate. The percentage of responding institutions rises to 64% if only regional hubs were considered (23/36). The median number of index procedures per center was 6.2, and a steady increase in the overall number of interventions over time was also noted. Most patients were males (73%) with a median age of 48 years. The most common endovascular procedure was TEVAR (N.=101), followed by F/BEVAR (N.=43) and EVAR (N.=37). The overall technical success rate was 83.4% while major adverse events and mortality at thirty days were reported at 18.2% and 9.9%, respectively. An additional 5.0% mortality rate was noted for an overall one-year mortality of 14.9%, while 3.7% of all treated patients were diagnosed with a type 1 endoleak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national cross-sectional survey, investigating trends in ER of GTADs and CTDs over two decades, highlights a consistent increase in the use of endovascular techniques for their treatment. Early mortality was acceptably low, yet influenced by the urgency of presentation. At one-year follow-up, a 5% additional death rate was noted, and the reintervention rate remained below one in ten.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12941-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: By this survey, we aim to gain national-based information regarding trends in endovascular repair (ER) for the treatment of aortic disease in patients with genetically-triggered aortic disease (GTAD) and connective tissue disorder (CTD) over the last two decades.

Methods: All Italian vascular surgery centers (N.=80) were invited to participate in an anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey on ER for GTAD/CTD.

Results: Overall, 29 institutions completed the survey, thereby yielding a 36% response rate. The percentage of responding institutions rises to 64% if only regional hubs were considered (23/36). The median number of index procedures per center was 6.2, and a steady increase in the overall number of interventions over time was also noted. Most patients were males (73%) with a median age of 48 years. The most common endovascular procedure was TEVAR (N.=101), followed by F/BEVAR (N.=43) and EVAR (N.=37). The overall technical success rate was 83.4% while major adverse events and mortality at thirty days were reported at 18.2% and 9.9%, respectively. An additional 5.0% mortality rate was noted for an overall one-year mortality of 14.9%, while 3.7% of all treated patients were diagnosed with a type 1 endoleak.

Conclusions: This national cross-sectional survey, investigating trends in ER of GTADs and CTDs over two decades, highlights a consistent increase in the use of endovascular techniques for their treatment. Early mortality was acceptably low, yet influenced by the urgency of presentation. At one-year follow-up, a 5% additional death rate was noted, and the reintervention rate remained below one in ten.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于二十年来遗传诱发的主动脉疾病和结缔组织疾病血管内修复的时间趋势的全国性横断面调查。
背景:通过这项调查,我们旨在获得有关过去二十年来血管内修复术(ER)治疗遗传诱发性主动脉疾病(GTAD)和结缔组织疾病(CTD)患者主动脉疾病趋势的全国性信息:方法:邀请意大利所有血管外科中心(人数=80)参加关于ER治疗GTAD/CTD的匿名电子横断面调查:共有 29 家机构完成了调查,回复率为 36%。如果只考虑地区中心,回复机构的比例将上升到 64%(23/36)。每个中心的索引程序中位数为 6.2 个,随着时间的推移,总干预次数也在稳步增加。大多数患者为男性(73%),中位年龄为 48 岁。最常见的血管内手术是 TEVAR(101 例),其次是 F/BEVAR(43 例)和 EVAR(37 例)。总体技术成功率为 83.4%,而重大不良事件和 30 天内死亡率分别为 18.2% 和 9.9%。一年内的总死亡率为 14.9%,另有 5.0% 的死亡率,而所有接受治疗的患者中有 3.7% 被诊断为 1 型内漏:这项全国性横断面调查对二十年来 GTAD 和 CTD 的急诊趋势进行了调查,结果表明,使用血管内技术治疗的人数持续增加。早期死亡率较低,但受发病急缓的影响。在一年的随访中,发现死亡率增加了5%,而再次介入率仍低于十分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tabular review of contemporary fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair experiences for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Efficacy of Sternum Guard vs. bone wax in post-cardiac surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial. Performance of a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Gore VBX) as bridging stent for B-EVAR. Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in ischemic heart disease: to operate or not? A meta-analysis. A national cross-sectional survey on time-trends for endovascular repair of genetically-triggered aortic disease and connective tissue disorders over two decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1