What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
Thomas K.F. Chiu , Zubair Ahmad , Murod Ismailov , Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi
{"title":"What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them","authors":"Thomas K.F. Chiu ,&nbsp;Zubair Ahmad ,&nbsp;Murod Ismailov ,&nbsp;Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) education in K–12 schools is a global initiative, yet planning and executing AI education is challenging. The major frameworks are focused on identifying content and technical knowledge (AI literacy). Most of the current definitions of AI literacy for a non-technical audience are developed from an engineering perspective and may not be appropriate for K–12 education. Teacher perspectives are essential to making sense of this initiative. Literacy is about knowing (knowledge, what skills); competency is about applying the knowledge in a beneficial way (confidence, how well). They are strongly related. This study goes beyond knowledge (AI literacy), and its two main goals are to (i) define AI literacy and competency by adding the aspects of confidence and self-reflective mindsets, and (ii) propose a more comprehensive framework for K–12 AI education. These definitions are needed for this emerging and disruptive technology (e.g., ChatGPT and Sora, generative AI). We used the definitions and the basic curriculum design approaches as the analytical framework and teacher perspectives. Participants included 30 experienced AI teachers from 15 middle schools. We employed an iterative co-design cycle to discuss and revise the framework throughout four cycles. The definition of AI competency has five abilities that take confidence into account, and the proposed framework comprises five key components: technology, impact, ethics, collaboration, and self-reflection. We also identify five effective learning experiences to foster abilities and confidences, and suggest five future research directions: prompt engineering, data literacy, algorithmic literacy, self-reflective mindset, and empirical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000120/pdfft?md5=93c7a04ec33c1105ed68603d377091e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000120-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) education in K–12 schools is a global initiative, yet planning and executing AI education is challenging. The major frameworks are focused on identifying content and technical knowledge (AI literacy). Most of the current definitions of AI literacy for a non-technical audience are developed from an engineering perspective and may not be appropriate for K–12 education. Teacher perspectives are essential to making sense of this initiative. Literacy is about knowing (knowledge, what skills); competency is about applying the knowledge in a beneficial way (confidence, how well). They are strongly related. This study goes beyond knowledge (AI literacy), and its two main goals are to (i) define AI literacy and competency by adding the aspects of confidence and self-reflective mindsets, and (ii) propose a more comprehensive framework for K–12 AI education. These definitions are needed for this emerging and disruptive technology (e.g., ChatGPT and Sora, generative AI). We used the definitions and the basic curriculum design approaches as the analytical framework and teacher perspectives. Participants included 30 experienced AI teachers from 15 middle schools. We employed an iterative co-design cycle to discuss and revise the framework throughout four cycles. The definition of AI competency has five abilities that take confidence into account, and the proposed framework comprises five key components: technology, impact, ethics, collaboration, and self-reflection. We also identify five effective learning experiences to foster abilities and confidences, and suggest five future research directions: prompt engineering, data literacy, algorithmic literacy, self-reflective mindset, and empirical research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是人工智能素养和能力?支持它们的综合框架
K-12 年级学校的人工智能(AI)教育是一项全球性倡议,但规划和实施人工智能教育却充满挑战。主要框架都侧重于确定内容和技术知识(人工智能素养)。目前大多数针对非技术受众的人工智能素养定义都是从工程学角度出发的,可能并不适合 K-12 教育。教师的观点对于理解这一倡议至关重要。素养是指知识(知识、什么技能);能力是指以有益的方式应用知识(信心、多好)。两者密切相关。本研究超越了知识(人工智能素养)的范畴,其两个主要目标是:(i) 通过增加自信和自我反思的思维方式来定义人工智能素养和能力;(ii) 为 K-12 人工智能教育提出一个更全面的框架。这种新兴的颠覆性技术(如 ChatGPT 和 Sora、生成式人工智能)需要这些定义。我们将这些定义和基本课程设计方法作为分析框架和教师视角。参与者包括来自 15 所中学的 30 名经验丰富的人工智能教师。我们采用迭代式共同设计周期,对框架进行了四次讨论和修订。人工智能能力的定义有五种能力,其中考虑到了自信,而建议的框架包括五个关键组成部分:技术、影响、道德、合作和自我反思。我们还确定了培养能力和信心的五种有效学习经验,并提出了五个未来研究方向:提示工程、数据素养、算法素养、自省心态和实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1