Additive intercropping system or acaricides: which one is more efficient to prevent population buildup of two-spotted spider mite?

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Environmental Entomology Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1093/ee/nvae019
Vahab Rahimi, Hossein Madadi
{"title":"Additive intercropping system or acaricides: which one is more efficient to prevent population buildup of two-spotted spider mite?","authors":"Vahab Rahimi, Hossein Madadi","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Habitat manipulation such as intercropping can be used as a simple and common cultural practice in pest management. This method is based on the principle of reducing pest populations by increasing the diversity of an ecosystem. This study has been carried out to evaluate the influence of additive series intercropping common bean with some aromatic plants (AP), and 2 acaricides on the different life stages (egg, immature mobile stages, and adult) of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae), over 2 yr of experimentation (2020 and 2021). This experiment was conducted following a randomized complete block design with 7 treatments including common bean monoculture, common bean sprayed by spiromesifen or Dayabon, and common bean + companion plants (coriander, ajwain, basil, or dill). Each treatment was replicated 3 replicates. The lowest and highest number of eggs, immature mobile stages, and adults were observed in common bean + spiromesifen and the common bean monoculture, respectively. Additionally, the common bean + Dayabon supported significantly different T. urticae life stage densities compared to common bean monoculture. Also, among intercropped treatments, common bean + basil showed the lowest number of T. urticae (eggs, immature mobile stages, and adults). The highest yield and land equivalent ratio were recorded in common bean + basil and common bean + spiromesifen, respectively. Finally, it can be concluded that additive intercropping with these AP can effectively decrease the T. urticae population density, which is useful for the safe production of common bean.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Habitat manipulation such as intercropping can be used as a simple and common cultural practice in pest management. This method is based on the principle of reducing pest populations by increasing the diversity of an ecosystem. This study has been carried out to evaluate the influence of additive series intercropping common bean with some aromatic plants (AP), and 2 acaricides on the different life stages (egg, immature mobile stages, and adult) of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae), over 2 yr of experimentation (2020 and 2021). This experiment was conducted following a randomized complete block design with 7 treatments including common bean monoculture, common bean sprayed by spiromesifen or Dayabon, and common bean + companion plants (coriander, ajwain, basil, or dill). Each treatment was replicated 3 replicates. The lowest and highest number of eggs, immature mobile stages, and adults were observed in common bean + spiromesifen and the common bean monoculture, respectively. Additionally, the common bean + Dayabon supported significantly different T. urticae life stage densities compared to common bean monoculture. Also, among intercropped treatments, common bean + basil showed the lowest number of T. urticae (eggs, immature mobile stages, and adults). The highest yield and land equivalent ratio were recorded in common bean + basil and common bean + spiromesifen, respectively. Finally, it can be concluded that additive intercropping with these AP can effectively decrease the T. urticae population density, which is useful for the safe production of common bean.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加剂间作系统和杀螨剂:哪种方法更有效地防止二斑蜘蛛螨种群增长?
间作等生境操作可作为害虫管理中一种简单而常见的文化实践。这种方法的原理是通过增加生态系统的多样性来减少害虫数量。本研究旨在评估间作普通豆类与一些芳香植物(AP)以及两种杀螨剂的添加剂系列在两年(2020 年和 2021 年)的实验中对 Tetranychus urticae Koch(瘤蚜科:Tetranychidae)不同生命阶段(卵、未成熟移动阶段和成虫)的影响。该试验采用随机完全区组设计,共设 7 个处理,包括蚕豆单作、蚕豆喷洒螺旋霉素或达亚邦、蚕豆+伴生植物(芫荽、茜草、罗勒或莳萝)。每个处理重复 3 次。卵、未成熟移动阶段和成虫的数量在普通豆+螺旋霉素和普通豆单作中分别最低和最高。此外,与普通豆单作相比,普通豆 + 达雅本支持的褐飞虱生命阶段密度有显著差异。此外,在间作处理中,蚕豆+罗勒的褐飞虱数量(卵、未成熟移动阶段和成虫)最低。普通豆+罗勒和普通豆+螺旋霉素的产量和土地当量比分别最高。最后,可以得出结论:与这些 AP 相加进行间作可以有效降低褐飞虱的种群密度,有利于蚕豆的安全生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Influence of different diet categories on gut bacterial diversity in Frankliniella occidentalis. A review of non-microbial biological control strategies against the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Addition of ammonium acetate to torula yeast borax and its effect on captures of three species of economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Testing the efficacy of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as a inundative biological control agent in Western Nebraska. Sex-ratio distortion in a weed biological control agent, Ceratapion basicorne (Coleoptera: Brentidae), associated with a species of Rickettsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1