{"title":"Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Therapy for Asthma in Murine Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Kiana Ghafourian, Arda Kiani, Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi","doi":"10.1007/s12015-024-10704-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a common disease, and among the most predominant causes of the years lived with disability. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as a promising avenue for asthma management. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies investigating the therapeutic use of MSC-EVs in murine models of asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted on broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cells and cytokines, as well as airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values and histological staining scores to determine the efficacy of MSC-EVs-based therapy, comparing treated rodents with untreated ones. BALF IL-4, BALF total cells, and BALF eosinophils were chosen as the primary outcomes, while airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values, BALF cytokines excluding IL-4, and histological staining scores were chosen as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 eligible studies were included in the current systematic review, with 9 assessing BALF IL-4, 11 assessing BALF total cells, and 10 assessing BALF eosinophils. Pooled Hedges' g (p-value) for each outcome was - 4.407 (< 0.001), -4.976 (< 0.001), and - 4.071 (< 0.001), showing that MSC-EVs therapy inhibits asthma pathology. Changes in secondary outcomes also indicated a reduction in inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant disparities between the type of rodents and administration routes, and meta-regressions were only significant for MSC-EVs source and dose in the IL-4 meta-analysis, and for administration frequency and time from the last challenge to sacrifice in the BALF total cell meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the current pre-clinical evidence of MSC-EVs therapy for asthma and finds its application ameliorates multiple aspects of asthma's pathology. We further underline the importance of MSC-EVs source, dose, administration frequency, and timing on the therapeutic effect and warrant further investigation and clinical translation to assess the best treatment regimen and to gauge the efficacy of EV therapy in human asthma cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21955,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1162-1183"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-024-10704-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Asthma is a common disease, and among the most predominant causes of the years lived with disability. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as a promising avenue for asthma management. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies investigating the therapeutic use of MSC-EVs in murine models of asthma.
Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted on broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cells and cytokines, as well as airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values and histological staining scores to determine the efficacy of MSC-EVs-based therapy, comparing treated rodents with untreated ones. BALF IL-4, BALF total cells, and BALF eosinophils were chosen as the primary outcomes, while airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values, BALF cytokines excluding IL-4, and histological staining scores were chosen as secondary outcomes.
Results: A total of 19 eligible studies were included in the current systematic review, with 9 assessing BALF IL-4, 11 assessing BALF total cells, and 10 assessing BALF eosinophils. Pooled Hedges' g (p-value) for each outcome was - 4.407 (< 0.001), -4.976 (< 0.001), and - 4.071 (< 0.001), showing that MSC-EVs therapy inhibits asthma pathology. Changes in secondary outcomes also indicated a reduction in inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant disparities between the type of rodents and administration routes, and meta-regressions were only significant for MSC-EVs source and dose in the IL-4 meta-analysis, and for administration frequency and time from the last challenge to sacrifice in the BALF total cell meta-analysis.
Conclusion: This review highlights the current pre-clinical evidence of MSC-EVs therapy for asthma and finds its application ameliorates multiple aspects of asthma's pathology. We further underline the importance of MSC-EVs source, dose, administration frequency, and timing on the therapeutic effect and warrant further investigation and clinical translation to assess the best treatment regimen and to gauge the efficacy of EV therapy in human asthma cases.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Stem Cell Reviews and Reports is to cover contemporary and emerging areas in stem cell research and regenerative medicine. The journal will consider for publication:
i) solicited or unsolicited reviews of topical areas of stem cell biology that highlight, critique and synthesize recent important findings in the field.
ii) full length and short reports presenting original experimental work.
iii) translational stem cell studies describing results of clinical trials using stem cells as therapeutics.
iv) papers focused on diseases of stem cells.
v) hypothesis and commentary articles as opinion-based pieces in which authors can propose a new theory, interpretation of a controversial area in stem cell biology, or a stem cell biology question or paradigm. These articles contain more speculation than reviews, but they should be based on solid rationale.
vi) protocols as peer-reviewed procedures that provide step-by-step descriptions, outlined in sufficient detail, so that both experts and novices can apply them to their own research.
vii) letters to the editor and correspondence.
In order to facilitate this exchange of scientific information and exciting novel ideas, the journal has created five thematic sections, focusing on:
i) the role of adult stem cells in tissue regeneration;
ii) progress in research on induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and mechanism governing embryogenesis and tissue development;
iii) the role of microenvironment and extracellular microvesicles in directing the fate of stem cells;
iv) mechanisms of stem cell trafficking, stem cell mobilization and homing with special emphasis on hematopoiesis;
v) the role of stem cells in aging processes and cancerogenesis.