Timing percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiovascular events in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2024-02-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Rouhollah Hemmati, Mobina Fathi, Morteza Heidarian Moghadam, Bahram Mohebbi, Kambiz Keshavarz, Ahmad Mohebbi, Asghar Rahmani
{"title":"Timing percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiovascular events in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.","authors":"Rouhollah Hemmati, Mobina Fathi, Morteza Heidarian Moghadam, Bahram Mohebbi, Kambiz Keshavarz, Ahmad Mohebbi, Asghar Rahmani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) needs to be well defined. In this study, based on the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in NSTEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this longitudinal study, we included 156 NSTEMI patients who underwent a PCI at three time points, including <12 hr. (n = 53), 12-24 hr. (n = 54), and ≥24 hr. (n = 49) and followed them for one, three, and six months to monitor major cardiovascular events. The data analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Four patients (2.56%) were hospitalized during the one-month follow-up, and only one patient (0.06%) had NSTEMI. The incidence of complications, such as readmission, acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 4 patients [2.56%]), and unstable angina (UA; 3 patients [1.92%]) did not differ significantly among the three intervention times. The occurrence of NSTEMI, UA, and recurrent PCI was 2.56%, 3.20%, and 5.12% in four, five, and eight patients, respectively, and no significant differences were observed among the aforementioned times. In the follow-up after six months, the incidence of STEMI, stroke, TLR, and other all-course deaths was observed in one person (0.06%), which all occurred within 12-24 hours. The difference among the three intervention times was non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings revealed an insignificant difference between the incidence of complications and the three-intervention time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) needs to be well defined. In this study, based on the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in NSTEMI patients.

Methods: In this longitudinal study, we included 156 NSTEMI patients who underwent a PCI at three time points, including <12 hr. (n = 53), 12-24 hr. (n = 54), and ≥24 hr. (n = 49) and followed them for one, three, and six months to monitor major cardiovascular events. The data analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.

Result: Four patients (2.56%) were hospitalized during the one-month follow-up, and only one patient (0.06%) had NSTEMI. The incidence of complications, such as readmission, acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 4 patients [2.56%]), and unstable angina (UA; 3 patients [1.92%]) did not differ significantly among the three intervention times. The occurrence of NSTEMI, UA, and recurrent PCI was 2.56%, 3.20%, and 5.12% in four, five, and eight patients, respectively, and no significant differences were observed among the aforementioned times. In the follow-up after six months, the incidence of STEMI, stroke, TLR, and other all-course deaths was observed in one person (0.06%), which all occurred within 12-24 hours. The difference among the three intervention times was non-significant.

Conclusion: Our findings revealed an insignificant difference between the incidence of complications and the three-intervention time.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时机与心血管事件。
背景:非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行冠状动脉造影的时机需要明确界定。在这项研究中,我们根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的时机,评估了 NSTEMI 患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率:在这项纵向研究中,我们纳入了 156 名在三个时间点(包括结果)接受 PCI 的 NSTEMI 患者:在一个月的随访期间,有四名患者(2.56%)住院治疗,只有一名患者(0.06%)患有 NSTEMI。再入院、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS;4 名患者[2.56%])和不稳定型心绞痛(UA;3 名患者[1.92%])等并发症的发生率在三个干预时间点之间没有显著差异。4、5 和 8 名患者的 NSTEMI、UA 和复发性 PCI 发生率分别为 2.56%、3.20% 和 5.12%,在上述时间之间未观察到明显差异。在 6 个月后的随访中,STEMI、卒中、TLR 和其他全过程死亡的发生率为 1 人(0.06%),均发生在 12-24 小时内。三种干预时间的差异不显著:我们的研究结果表明,并发症发生率与三次干预时间之间的差异并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Disparities by sex, race, and region in acute myocardial infarction-related outcomes during the early COVID-19 pandemic: the national inpatient sample analysis. Evaluating antiarrhythmic drugs for managing infants with supraventricular tachycardia; a review. Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of frailty index on cardiovascular outcomes and readmissions of patent foramen ovale closure procedure: a propensity matched national analysis. Percutaneous coronary intervention involving coronary bifurcation is associated with higher mortality and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1